Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
If this is an example of successfull marketing, how stupid can american buyers be?
The h1 and the h2 are not intended for the same purpose. The h2 and h3 are nothing more than a crappy build up of an already crappy SUV (taho/yukon & colorado/canyon). Disregarding my subjective opinion of the quality of these vehicles you can't deny that the usage of the h2's and h3's are no different than any other SUV out there.
The commercial is based towards the American market, we are the only country stupid enough where a company claim that a vehicle with >16 mpg as the answer to climate change disasters.
i understand they are naturla disasters, and that they have been happening ever since there have been beach houses, trailor parks, and mountain side homes. The point is that global warming claims that these naturla disasters will happen with greater magnitude, and with greater frequencey.
the commercials are taking this threat of more disasterous disasters and spinning it as a reason to buy a hummer. As you've said natural disasters have been around for ages before global warming ever came to be an issue, however this has been the first time i've seen them used as a threat against the consumer.
do you honestly fail to see the point i'm making or do you need me to connect the dots for you?
