Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
Nikon 18-200mm or sigma18-200 os
Is it really worth spending the extra 200-300 for the nikon name and a little bit better quality lens. the both have the vibration reduction/optical stabilization. so if anyone has experience with either lens.....how to the work....shoot....feel....ext. is it worth going for the nikon???? thanks
Nikon lenses generally are better constructed than Sigma lenses, or so my experienced photography teacher in college says. I would trust her word with that. I have two Nikkor (Nikon brand) lenses for my D80 and they definitely operate to my expectations.
Remember me as Leckett.
NS Skateboard, NS MH
"The thing about metal is it never gets old. If you get bored of it, crank the volume up and it's fuckin brand new again" - me
I wash myself with a rag on a stick.
The nikkor has better glass.
Spit your game
Talk your shit
Grab your gat
Call your clicks
Message me to be in the Big boulder,PA cult.
if you have a kit lens wich is surely something around 18-55 or 70 I'd go for 70-210, classic lens for portraits and good zoom. anyway. just my 2 cents.
All times are Eastern (-5)