Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Which ones???

profile picture
2planking
Posts: 1180 - Karma: 17
Click for larger image

Click for larger image

which ones should i get i'm 5'10, 150lbs, geteing as a allmoutain/powder ski

the seth is probably better but i really like the look of the bacon
Aug 2 2007 7:28PM
0 0
profile picture
Shadows
Posts: 8068 - Karma: 42
i vote line
Aug 2 2007 7:30PM
0 0
profile picture
lyndon
Posts: 7266 - Karma: 127
Seth for sure.
Aug 2 2007 7:31PM
0 0
profile picture
GUZ
Posts: 1371 - Karma: 255
for all mountain i vote seth.
Aug 2 2007 7:32PM
0 0
profile picture
dave44
Posts: 11052 - Karma: 113
K2 Seths....
Aug 2 2007 7:32PM
0 0
profile picture
japanada
Posts: 13784 - Karma: 1,957
your looking at the lines cause you like em???? the lines are fatter and softer, i personally like them over the seths.
Aug 2 2007 7:33PM
0 0
profile picture
dave44
Posts: 11052 - Karma: 113
I vote K2 Seths
Aug 2 2007 7:35PM
0 0
profile picture
-NY-STeeZE-
Posts: 2114 - Karma: 23
i like the SFB's
Aug 2 2007 7:38PM
0 0
profile picture
dave44
Posts: 11052 - Karma: 113
I vote K2 Seths again.
Aug 2 2007 7:38PM
0 0
profile picture
2planking
Posts: 1180 - Karma: 17
they're both about the same fex line is softer but no too much. the seths have more side cut. the bacon's look way better.
Aug 2 2007 7:41PM
0 0
profile picture
ski_DC
Posts: 1347 - Karma: 53
the seths have a small rocker in the tips and tails which would be sweet for pow
Aug 2 2007 7:47PM
0 0
profile picture
kepler.
Posts: 8761 - Karma: 139
i see these as two completely different skis. i don't know how you are deciding between the two
Aug 2 2007 7:49PM
0 0
profile picture
2planking
Posts: 1180 - Karma: 17
explain
Aug 2 2007 7:59PM
0 0
profile picture
kepler.
Posts: 8761 - Karma: 139
i see the seth as a much more bomb proof ski than the bacons. the seths are for more of everything, fast ripping lines or soft floaty pow. buttering with them wouldn't be hard but wouldn't be so easy with the SFB's. the bacons though are that super buttery wide ski for only the fluffy stuff. unless you plan on skiing switch and buttering in and out of your turns, go seths. i personally would think teh bacons would be so much more fun
Aug 2 2007 8:09PM
0 0
profile picture
dave44
Posts: 11052 - Karma: 113
 I vote K2 Seths .. again. Just do it. Mini rocker is good for everything too
Aug 2 2007 8:11PM
0 0
profile picture
2planking
Posts: 1180 - Karma: 17
well i don't think i would use it when its bullet proof snow but any other time i would. i guess the seths are the better ski for me but the sfb's look so nice, i'm not saying looks really matter but i want something that i like the look of.
Aug 2 2007 9:56PM
0 0
profile picture
invader7
Posts: 5756 - Karma: 49
lines
Aug 2 2007 11:11PM
0 0
profile picture
CBROOKS
Posts: 4979 - Karma: 10,708
SETH
Aug 2 2007 11:13PM
0 0
profile picture
Swan_Solo
Posts: 2374 - Karma: 14
seth's
Aug 2 2007 11:17PM
0 0
profile picture
ski_DC
Posts: 1347 - Karma: 53
the seths are much more versatile than the SFBs because their waist is 98. they would do more justice on groomers and be easier to ski park with, since they have a lower swing weight.
Aug 3 2007 1:36AM
0 0
profile picture
2planking
Posts: 1180 - Karma: 17
yeah i understand that. i wont use it the park though. it’s mostly because the seths graphics are so loud that i'm on the fence with this.
Aug 3 2007 4:22AM
0 0
profile picture
kepler.
Posts: 8761 - Karma: 139
please please please don't care about graphics. if its a good ski thats all that matters. i fucking hate the arv graphics next year but that isn't stopping me from getttin them cuz they are perfect for what i want to do
Aug 3 2007 12:43PM
0 0
profile picture
wils.
Posts: 2012 - Karma: 48
id say sethh
Aug 3 2007 12:44PM
0 0
profile picture
ski_DC
Posts: 1347 - Karma: 53
amen. it doesnt matter what your skis look like if they perform the way you want them to
Aug 3 2007 4:10PM
0 0
profile picture
2planking
Posts: 1180 - Karma: 17
the SFB's are 100$ cheaper too
Aug 3 2007 7:16PM
0 0
profile picture
ski_DC
Posts: 1347 - Karma: 53
true, but do you actually need 115 under foot? and if you do decide to get the SFBs you should check out last years model. the green with the frog and giraffe and shit is so tight looking
Aug 3 2007 7:21PM
0 0
profile picture
2planking
Posts: 1180 - Karma: 17
true, i getting the seths allmost for sure they look alot better in person
Aug 3 2007 7:24PM
0 0
profile picture
ski_DC
Posts: 1347 - Karma: 53
last years seths were nice, and these should be even better. and the graphics are so sick.
Aug 3 2007 7:26PM
0 0
profile picture
2planking
Posts: 1180 - Karma: 17
should i get 169 or 179 i was thinking 169 easier to spin but i'm not going to use in the park hardly at all
Aug 5 2007 2:50AM
0 0
profile picture
RtC.
Posts: 1156 - Karma: 28
179 man, they're gonna be a lot floatyer in the pow, and gonna make going everywhere a lot more fun. The actual difference in swing weight won't be too bad. They're a nice ski with a dope little rocker.
Aug 5 2007 6:02AM
0 0
profile picture
steezyjibber
Posts: 15967 - Karma: 11,016
bacon
Aug 5 2007 7:47AM
0 0
profile picture
JGP.
Posts: 2785 - Karma: 474
dude the 08 bacons are way sick. i skied on em last season and they are the most fun ive ever on a ski. 115 isnt even that fat, i was skiing trees and riping groomers in no time. and in the pow they are unreal. graphic looks even better in person
Aug 5 2007 8:10AM
0 0
profile picture
xcjamie
Posts: 416 - Karma: 20
seths
but the bacons are sweet
Aug 5 2007 10:07AM
0 0
profile picture
Tom
Posts: 101 - Karma: 10
seths
Aug 5 2007 11:03AM
0 0
profile picture
CFSGabe
Posts: 354 - Karma: 11
both
Aug 5 2007 12:01PM
0 0
profile picture
Bo_bot9
Posts: 1437 - Karma: 275
lines for what your saying but if your going to venture into the park 30%-40% then seth.
Aug 5 2007 1:20PM
0 0
profile picture
dave44
Posts: 11052 - Karma: 113
K2 Seths....
Aug 5 2007 1:28PM
0 0
profile picture
caylorswift
Posts: 10695 - Karma: 312
Seths
Aug 5 2007 3:00PM
0 0
profile picture
2planking
Posts: 1180 - Karma: 17
i've got anothere ski that i will use on really shitty days and COP(small hill thats half park). depending on what mountain i'm at or who i'm with i'll end up taking a run or two throught the park. when i'm at the mountain i don't go to go in the park very much cuz i got COP at home.
so it would be like 15%-25% park
Aug 5 2007 8:31PM
0 0
profile picture
poofartpee
Posts: 7436 - Karma: 1,537
if ur talkin graphic seth
Aug 5 2007 10:47PM
0 0
profile picture
wils.
Posts: 2012 - Karma: 48
^ and if your talking quality seth also
Aug 5 2007 10:50PM
0 0
profile picture
dave44
Posts: 11052 - Karma: 113
K2 Seths
Aug 5 2007 10:55PM
0 0
profile picture
Twinjibber77
Posts: 6239 - Karma: 2,356
none.....cauee ur a faget!!!!!!!!!!
Aug 5 2007 11:20PM
0 0
profile picture
Twinjibber77
Posts: 6239 - Karma: 2,356
ahhh..srry dude...get seths...ur cool..i thopught this was someone elses thread
Aug 5 2007 11:21PM
0 0
profile picture
dave44
Posts: 11052 - Karma: 113
As I said 5 times before, K2 Seths.
Aug 6 2007 1:44AM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)