Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Is 176 too much

profile picture
JCon
Posts: 399 - Karma: 9
I'm 5' 11 and weight around 150 and i'm lookin for some new skis. Is 176 cm too much?
Feb 25 2007 3:01PM
0 0
profile picture
SkierX
Posts: 16253 - Karma: 538
No way. Sounds about right.

You should be at 176-182cm
Feb 25 2007 3:05PM
0 0
profile picture
zylstra
Posts: 3613 - Karma: 125
hes right
Feb 25 2007 3:08PM
0 0
profile picture
nothanks
Posts: 13551 - Karma: 31
Don't go any smaller.
Feb 25 2007 3:13PM
0 0
profile picture
JCon
Posts: 399 - Karma: 9
thanks.. also would you centermount a ski like 'the dumont'
Feb 25 2007 3:26PM
0 0
profile picture
aaron.ebner
Posts: 2868 - Karma: 61
those are made to be mounted forward
Feb 25 2007 3:30PM
0 0
profile picture
Skipig25
Posts: 10729 - Karma: 256
yea, if you ski 50% or more park, I would centermount the dumonts. and don't buy marker bindings
Feb 25 2007 3:46PM
0 0
profile picture
JCon
Posts: 399 - Karma: 9
i'm gonna use some look p12 (i think) that i have
Feb 25 2007 3:53PM
0 0
profile picture
JayDope
Posts: 6842 - Karma: 408
soudns good, im 5'10, and have 176 t-halls with lookpx12 ti jibs the bindings are better than my last pair, but i should have got the pivots
Feb 25 2007 3:55PM
0 0
profile picture
Skipig25
Posts: 10729 - Karma: 256
176 centermounted with p12 will be a sick setup
Feb 25 2007 3:56PM
0 0
profile picture
Triple11
Posts: 698 - Karma: 10
176 was too much for your mom last night!
Feb 25 2007 3:57PM
0 0
profile picture
Sholte
Posts: 2929 - Karma: 12
that sounds about right. you might even want to go longer
Feb 25 2007 4:02PM
0 0
profile picture
Caleb_F
Posts: 197 - Karma: 156
No, it isn't too much. Yes, centermount it.
Feb 26 2007 10:47AM
0 0
profile picture
michiganjibber
Posts: 587 - Karma: 61
that's crazy that people ride such small skis. i'm 5'8"/165 lbs and i ride 182's.. and i think i'd do fine up to 187 or even 190, especially if i rode pow more. i took my friend's 180cm 4frnt msps out for urban jibbing to see how they'd work and i had no problem.
Feb 26 2007 10:51AM
0 0
profile picture
nitsua
Posts: 4631 - Karma: 726
sounds perfect
Feb 26 2007 11:23AM
0 0
profile picture
SkierX
Posts: 16253 - Karma: 538
He'll be skiing park in Pennsylvania...

No need for a mid 180-190cm ski.

If I lived out west and slashed powder often, I'd have much larger skis, but no need for that size for groomers/park
Feb 28 2007 10:23AM
0 0
profile picture
S2daJ
Posts: 919 - Karma: 10
im shorter than you, weigh less than you and i ski 176.
Feb 28 2007 10:24AM
0 0
profile picture
vermontsteez
Posts: 924 - Karma: 19
i was thinking about either getting ar6's or invaders? im 5'8, for the ar6's i was thinking like 166's and the invaders the 171's? does that sound right
Feb 28 2007 10:42AM
0 0
profile picture
vermontsteez
Posts: 924 - Karma: 19
what is easier to ride smaller or bigger skis?
Feb 28 2007 10:45AM
0 0
profile picture
SkierX
Posts: 16253 - Karma: 538
All depends on what type of terrain you are skiing.

Shorter will be easier to throw around in the park, but less stable at speed, and big landings.

In powder, a longer ski will float more and just be more stable, but also will be harder to make the tight turns in the trees.
Feb 28 2007 10:47AM
0 0
profile picture
K-Thomas
Posts: 2700 - Karma: 604
don't get the 166 armadas...get the 176 or w/e that size is. armadas feel like there's no ski under you. and a 166 would be way short
Feb 28 2007 10:48AM
0 0
profile picture
vermontsteez
Posts: 924 - Karma: 19
aight thnx
Feb 28 2007 11:04AM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)