Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
Public enemy 159 too small?
Posts: 10
-
Karma: 10
Is this size ski too small for a 5'10'' guy who weights 70kg? my alternative is 1080 foil 174. I'm an intermediate skiier but only just getting into freestyle. cheers
Posts: 239
-
Karma: 40
The 159 PE is definitely too small!!! It's so small for you, that it's not even funny!
Definitely go for the 174 Foil!
Posts: 10
-
Karma: 10
thanks, thing is the foils are last season and they seem really wide at the front. is that because of their powder ability? cheers
Posts: 239
-
Karma: 40
Exactly! But they still carve pretty well due to their small radius (for a twin) which is 17.4m. The foils are best to be used by lighter people, 75 kg max.
I tried my 174 last year in powder and they rock! But then again, they rock pretty much everywhere, except on icy groomers, of course.
Posts: 9366
-
Karma: 445
definitely too small, im 5'3 and 130 lbs and use 159 pe's
Posts: 4418
-
Karma: 1,937
get the foils, they aren't even that wide
Posts: 1677
-
Karma: 26
Waaaay too small. Go with the foils. Definately. Hell, you could go with a bigger size than a 174. I ride well great on 168s and I'm 5'5. But I prefer riding my friends 176 triplets.
Posts: 88
-
Karma: 10
im 5,7'and i use the 159 pe's its up to my eye brows.
Posts: 897
-
Karma: 10
unless you have a fu€cked up head thats impossible...159 to eyebrow and you 5'7 ? you on drugs buddy/
Posts: 88
-
Karma: 10
dud your pritty fucked you down even know what your saying the skis are 5,3' 5,4' ish when there standing stright up and down and im 5,7'
Posts: 7436
-
Karma: 1,537
159 way to small deff get the 174 foils instead...even thoe those might be a bit small, but ur new to jumps and shit so they should be fine...better than a 159 PE fo sure
Posts: 1754
-
Karma: 110
lol 159 would look extremely stupid. you should defenatly go for the foils
Posts: 88
-
Karma: 10
dud if thats the case you are definatly not 5,5 you would be like 5,9'
Posts: 10471
-
Karma: 2,184
Posts: 9366
-
Karma: 445
no, im 5'3 and theyre like half a centimeter shorter than my height which is probably at the top of my forehead, a person 2 inches taller and a ski 1 cm longer would be around the top of the nose
Posts: 1677
-
Karma: 26
I'm 5'5 and my 168 scratches are Head high
Posts: 7266
-
Karma: 127
gross, you like like your 40 in your profile.
Posts: 239
-
Karma: 40
That's only cause you still got milk dripping out of your mouth!!!
Posts: 88
-
Karma: 10
haha, thats pritty funny man
Posts: 9086
-
Karma: 1,349
skis should be as tall as you
Posts: 10471
-
Karma: 2,184
^that goes against me, being 5'7, and my 188 jp's
Posts: 88
-
Karma: 10
isent it hard to spin in the air with longer skis??
Posts: 10471
-
Karma: 2,184
not when shits big eniuf. its obviously harder but landings r stomped
Posts: 4221
-
Karma: 13
if you want some 159 PE's i got 07's used once didnt take them to the park even shoot me an offer on those
All times are Eastern (-4)
