Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

The FATest ski ever!

profile picture
kpudgar
Posts: 239 - Karma: 40
http://www.skipass.com/guide-matos/ski/2007/duret/legende-series.html

This PHATtie is 170 underfoot!

It's a monster in anyone's closet!
Aug 20 2006 6:40PM
0 0
profile picture
eheath
Posts: 61090 - Karma: 118,083
Those are seriously like two old school snowboards, jesus.
Aug 20 2006 6:41PM
0 0
profile picture
Calb3rt
Posts: 6005 - Karma: 2,202
meh i've seen fatter. my bed acctually splits in 2 and double as skeeze. outragious!
Aug 20 2006 7:06PM
0 0
profile picture
mavw
Posts: 130 - Karma: 10
i dont think anyone needs skis that fat
Aug 20 2006 7:12PM
0 0
profile picture
SIX
Posts: 4595 - Karma: 506
omg those skis are HUGE and they are worth 989 Euros
Aug 20 2006 7:13PM
0 0
profile picture
Aenigma
Posts: 11256 - Karma: 424
I think the only person that could ski those without banging them together all the time would be Tanner Hall. They're pretty cool skis, just totally useless unless you're a total fatass.
Aug 20 2006 7:46PM
0 0
profile picture
invaderskier36
Posts: 6192 - Karma: 41
pollard?
Aug 20 2006 7:54PM
0 0
profile picture
buckweet
Posts: 1133 - Karma: 9
those skis are dope
Aug 20 2006 8:24PM
0 0
profile picture
philipc
Posts: 6651 - Karma: 1,286
gayy
Aug 20 2006 8:36PM
0 0
profile picture
Charley.
Posts: 1754 - Karma: 110
that not even cool anymore
Aug 20 2006 8:46PM
0 0
profile picture
invaderskier36
Posts: 6192 - Karma: 41
pollards 150 cm waist =cool


those=gay
Aug 20 2006 8:59PM
0 0
profile picture
skimasterflex
Posts: 2064 - Karma: 16
hahaha word.
Aug 20 2006 9:21PM
0 0
profile picture
skimasterflex
Posts: 2064 - Karma: 16
Wait a minute I thought I recognized those. Get this, those used to be sold individually as Monoskis. Now they are jumping on the Fat ski thing to try to break even on the mold they made since nobody buys Monos. No joke, those were not originally built as pairs.
Aug 20 2006 9:24PM
0 0
profile picture
MLB
Posts: 4462 - Karma: 298
you don't really need anything bigger then the prophet, and even that is HUGE. Tons of people still ski the BC old school style with 200 cm racers man.
Aug 20 2006 10:08PM
0 0
profile picture
poofartpee
Posts: 7436 - Karma: 1,537
my home made ones are 220 waiste
Aug 20 2006 10:30PM
0 0
profile picture
Aenigma
Posts: 11256 - Karma: 424
There's no point to having a waist bigger than 125mm. I've skied plenty of neck-deep days and I have never seen the need for something that fat. The only reason companies can sell skis that wide is that people will buy them just to brag about how fat their skis are. And if you try to argue that a ski that huge is revolutionary in any sort of way, it isn't. It's exactly the same as any other ski except they made it wider. There is nothing special about the prophet 130. The only powder skis that deserve recognition for being innovative are the ones McConkey designed.
Aug 20 2006 10:46PM
0 0
profile picture
MALONE
Posts: 3819 - Karma: 73
those are about as wide as Heaths ankles
Aug 20 2006 10:55PM
0 0
profile picture
Ryno
Posts: 31125 - Karma: 336
bahahahahaahaha!


I havent laughed in here for a while.

That was good
Aug 20 2006 11:09PM
0 0
profile picture
dtn13
Posts: 1543 - Karma: 143
haha
Aug 20 2006 11:14PM
0 0
profile picture
iggyskier
Posts: 10433 - Karma: 9,727
What you should notice is they made a snowboard that is 3mm wider throughout....so the literally just made a pair of skis with 2 snowboards.
Aug 20 2006 11:47PM
0 0
profile picture
iggyskier
Posts: 10433 - Karma: 9,727
Lotus 138?  That ski crushes the spats and it is 138 in the waist.

but I tend to agree....anything over 120 isnt really needed althought it can be pretty fun.
Aug 20 2006 11:49PM
0 0
profile picture
Aenigma
Posts: 11256 - Karma: 424
Touche.

There are a few skis that are the same basic concept as the spatula, somehow I totally forgot about those. But yeah, if you're not going with a reverse sidecut ski there isn't much of a need to go over 125 at the waist.
Aug 21 2006 12:01AM
0 0
profile picture
iggyskier
Posts: 10433 - Karma: 9,727
you said what I actually wanted to add: In a traditional shape, going super fat is kind of stupid.  You need to have some type of rocker tip, crazy sidecut, etc, to make them fun
Aug 21 2006 12:06AM
0 0
profile picture
iggyskier
Posts: 10433 - Karma: 9,727
or could be a monoski, not a snowboard.

whatever it is, they are retardedly fat
Aug 21 2006 12:09AM
0 0
profile picture
cofreeskier
Posts: 3189 - Karma: 15
fuck these are so fat
Aug 21 2006 12:10AM
0 0
profile picture
nothanks
Posts: 13551 - Karma: 31
The Prophet 130?

Oh wait, nevermind....Line made that, and then the following two years creating/producing/riding the fattest ski has just become a dick swinging contest. Anything post 130 in a mass production(i.e. excluding iggy, dp, etc...don't kill me guys) has just become GET IT FATTER CLAIM THE FATTEST....
Aug 21 2006 12:26AM
0 0
profile picture
Jake...
Posts: 11976 - Karma: 296
thats just retarded.
Aug 21 2006 12:42AM
0 0
profile picture
RainbowRipper
Posts: 23 - Karma: 10
wish i could read the reviews underneath... anyone know french/foreign? ha
Aug 21 2006 1:47AM
0 0
profile picture
kpudgar
Posts: 239 - Karma: 40
Those would make a good everyday east ski :)))
Aug 21 2006 2:43AM
0 0
profile picture
SeymourGrease
Posts: 1723 - Karma: 23
damn those as fat as yo mama bitch!!!
Aug 21 2006 2:53AM
0 0
profile picture
nothanks
Posts: 13551 - Karma: 31
Might I add any 150mm underfoot proto of Pollard's to my "accepted" list.
Aug 21 2006 2:38PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)