Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

169 or 174??

profile picture
k2sparticus
Posts: 43 - Karma: 10
Should i get the 169 or 174 public enemy (new model)? Im 5 foot 10 and weigh 135 lbs. Also is how would the rossi axial 110 binding be for me on those skis? and are those skis good? i don't do a whole lot of park, but i'm gonna start going more, i mainly need a good all mountain ski,
Oct 3 2005 9:47PM
0 0
profile picture
k2sparticus
Posts: 43 - Karma: 10
ok thanks for the recomendation, is the 174 gonna be too long for the bumps? (cause living in CO i do a lot of those) and is it gonna be too long or too heavy to try stuff in the BC or park? The guy at my shop said he wanted to put me on 163's but those are really freaking short so i wasn't gonna go lower than 169 but u really think i should consider the 174?
Oct 3 2005 9:54PM
0 0
profile picture
k2sparticus
Posts: 43 - Karma: 10
anyone??
Oct 3 2005 10:09PM
0 0
profile picture
Aenigma
Posts: 11256 - Karma: 424
I'd go for the 174's for sure, they're a bit short if anything. For skiing around the mountain you'll want a bit longer ski than for the park so that's the main decision to make as far as length goes. You'll be fine in the bumps with that size of ski, too, I'm 6' and my 180cm mogul skis are just a bit short for my preference.
Oct 3 2005 10:13PM
0 0
profile picture
johanblaze
Posts: 4987 - Karma: 343
179 man.
Oct 3 2005 10:14PM
0 0
profile picture
hoodskiier
Posts: 288 - Karma: 12
Definately go with the 174s if not longer. The guy at the shop wanted to put someone whos 5'10 on 163? that's worthless
Oct 3 2005 10:17PM
0 0
profile picture
k2sparticus
Posts: 43 - Karma: 10
ya i have no idea wtf he was thinking when he tried to sell me the 163's cause they are freaking small, but ok i guess i'll turn my sights more towards the 174
And how is the new PE? is it a good all mountain? have anyone skiied it?
Oct 3 2005 10:20PM
0 0
profile picture
johanblaze
Posts: 4987 - Karma: 343
it's amazing.
Oct 3 2005 10:31PM
0 0
profile picture
Pklink04
Posts: 5608 - Karma: 392
ever since the PE came out it has been the best all mountain ski out there, you won't be upset
Oct 3 2005 10:36PM
0 0
profile picture
k2sparticus
Posts: 43 - Karma: 10
alright thanks for the help, so it sounds like the general consensus is that i should look at the 174? for my height and weight and for what i do?
Oct 3 2005 10:49PM
0 0
profile picture
Kev
Posts: 7411 - Karma: 35
yes, don;t go any shorter then the 174.
Oct 3 2005 10:55PM
0 0
profile picture
k2sparticus
Posts: 43 - Karma: 10
Aight thanks for all the help
Oct 3 2005 11:01PM
0 0
profile picture
troublemakerCO
Posts: 458 - Karma: 10
174's....no. 179's....for sure.
Oct 4 2005 12:01AM
0 0
profile picture
k2sparticus
Posts: 43 - Karma: 10
i think 179 is pushing it, but hell ya no pain, no jane... thats a fun mountain
Oct 4 2005 12:25AM
0 0
profile picture
troublemakerCO
Posts: 458 - Karma: 10
this guys 2 in. taller and 15 pds heavier than me and i ski 175 and could easily go higher (even in the bumps). i say go with the 179 unless ur a total beginner.
Oct 4 2005 12:30AM
0 0
profile picture
k2sparticus
Posts: 43 - Karma: 10
no i'm pretty advanced, ok so i'll look at the 179's- they have the sickest graphic out of the rest anyway
Oct 4 2005 12:34AM
0 0
profile picture
ARski28
Posts: 1069 - Karma: 129
im 5'10" as well and got the 79s, just mount em up further
Oct 4 2005 12:54AM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)