Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Puffy pants or links

profile picture
rrjames
Posts: 298 - Karma: 15
im looking to buy a new pair of ski pants and i cant decide on the puffys or links from oakley which would be warmer

High North Session 1&2

Gropen Frau Lmao!

I ate a lava lamp it wasn't lava
Sep 23 2005 9:14AM
0 0
profile picture
dandoy
Posts: 5522 - Karma: 13
puffys=warmer but probably not as waterproof/unwet

"He can pull mistys, switch backs, various 360's, 540's and 720's and is currently working on Lincoln Loops."

-Bthere TV on Tanner Hall
Sep 23 2005 9:18AM
0 0
profile picture
Triple_Strum
Posts: 6382 - Karma: 946
warmer? puffys I suppose. But you get what you pay for. and if they are some of the cheapest pants in Oakley's line, they are made cheaply. Check out Burton pants, for the same price you can get 20,000 mm sick pants

I dream of winter.
Sep 23 2005 2:35PM
0 0
profile picture
norsk_jibber
Posts: 318 - Karma: 18
i cant deside either what panties to buy.. gonna buy one of the tomorrow, and i think i
Nov 14 2005 1:33AM
0 0
profile picture
norsk_jibber
Posts: 318 - Karma: 18
i cant deside either what panties to buy.. gonna buy one of the tomorrow, and i think ill go for the links
Nov 14 2005 1:33AM
0 0
profile picture
S.Harkins
Posts: 645 - Karma: 373
yeah - well the puffys are warm and not warter proof - links are fleeced lined and water proof - so...its up to you
Nov 14 2005 1:48AM
0 0
profile picture
pie
Posts: 205 - Karma: 10
anyone know where to get the puffys in antifreeze large? i cant find htem anywhere
Nov 14 2005 2:12AM
0 0
profile picture
Lineskier-101
Posts: 7863 - Karma: 22
The puffy pants have 4,000 waterproofing, that's not terrible. Siver had that last year, and I've never heard anyone talk bad about them.
Nov 14 2005 9:21AM
0 0
profile picture
n0gga
Posts: 1053 - Karma: 103
i got the black link pant in xl and it seems to be pretty warm. its not as thin as you would expect it to be.
Nov 14 2005 10:25AM
0 0
profile picture
freezed
Posts: 12973 - Karma: 500
actually, 4,000 IS pretty bad.

don't go for under 10,000
Nov 14 2005 11:15AM
0 0
profile picture
Ryno
Posts: 31125 - Karma: 336
my oakley lab2.0 pants are 4000 or 5000 i think and they are both warm as hell and waterproof...i never got wet in them.
Nov 14 2005 1:07PM
0 0
profile picture
J.D.
Posts: 21362 - Karma: 5,141
http://www.backcountry.com/store/NIK0006/c3/s5/Nikwax-Down-Proof-Solution.html?id=stHnTdFr
Nov 14 2005 1:07PM
0 0
profile picture
Triple_Strum
Posts: 6382 - Karma: 946
Freezed and AnotherPE are right. If it is a sunny, dry day, 4 or 5K won't be that bad. But, if you ski a longer day where snow is constantly touching your pants (powder much?) you need 10K or better
Nov 14 2005 1:45PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)