Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Concept of reactors

profile picture
bigsoxfan
Posts: 734 - Karma: 10
i kno there have been a lot of posts about reactors, but i have a question that i dont think has been talked about. is anyone sure that line is going to continue the concept of the reactors? i mean cuz they released them prolly thinking there was nothing wrong with them and then a ton of problems crop up. will they try to fix them or will the idea simply be scrapped b/c they dont know how to fix the problems?

Snow Me Blazer

Go Redsox

LINE-"Because skiing needs a future."
May 25 2005 8:48PM
0 0
profile picture
*Peterson*
Posts: 3 - Karma: 10
good question

Enom Headwear.. If your gonna ride twins, cover your head
May 25 2005 8:53PM
0 0
profile picture
joshbryant
Posts: 2133 - Karma: 228
They are definetly improving it.


Jibij Pro Shop
2714 28th St.
Boulder, CO 80301
303-440-1244
www.jibij.com
May 25 2005 9:07PM
0 0
profile picture
bigsoxfan
Posts: 734 - Karma: 10
thats great to hear

Snow Me Blazer

Go Redsox

LINE-"Because skiing needs a future."
May 25 2005 9:08PM
0 0
profile picture
D-40
Posts: 6050 - Karma: 100
i dont think that they could get off the concept because its such a great idea. its only the second time the have made a binding so they are still getting the hang of it.

May 25 2005 9:25PM
0 0
profile picture
papasteeze
Posts: 12055 - Karma: 911
at 43 and too many reconstructions.... I really hope they hang in there and lighten them up (too heavy)
Line Darksides with R10's

May 25 2005 9:58PM
0 0
profile picture
mk2
Posts: 1330 - Karma: 13
the core idea for teh reactors is great but they do need to do fine tuning. i think they needed more testing before they released the binding. also does line have any plans on licensing the mounting tech to other companies?

_______________________

and saint paul did approch the rail and the lord did say "hit it you pussy". and saint paul did hit the rail and the lord was pleased
May 26 2005 12:27PM
0 0
profile picture
Mex_LineJib^a
Posts: 3928 - Karma: 65
i got reactors a few weeks ago but never ridden on them... they do seem heavy but then again my chronics are lite. anybody rides reactors with chronics that can tell how they handle??

"... french girls say oui... spanish girls say aaay papi"
- pandinho trovatta

dont listen to what I say...there's no snow where I live!
May 26 2005 12:33PM
0 0
profile picture
mnjib
Posts: 5592 - Karma: 357
you people and heavy bindings. its doesnt really matter its under your foot. i dont see how it will effect you. i have rossi demo's probably the heavest binding out there and i have had no problem with them.


snap crackle pop
May 26 2005 1:18PM
0 0
profile picture
skifiend
Posts: 2063 - Karma: 13
^I don't know your weight/height, but the weight of the reactors would def. come into play if your some little 100lb, 5 foot grom....if you're 6'2'' and 180lbs like me, the extra weight of the binding isn't as big an issue.


Smuggs kicks ass

Fat skis, Tight trees
May 26 2005 2:26PM
0 0
profile picture
guddgulf17
Posts: 3037 - Karma: 10
skifiend is right

Offical NS Pastor, Rabbi, Ayatolla, and Revelator
May 26 2005 2:37PM
0 0
profile picture
skimasterflex
Posts: 2064 - Karma: 16
weight matters exponentially more in the extremities of the ski and much less in the center. I just really hope they use better plastic next year.

'Skiing is 90% outfit, 5% equipment, and 5% ability' -Lief Storer
May 26 2005 2:41PM
0 0
profile picture
BillyGoteMan
Posts: 1983 - Karma: 12
good concept but they overdid it on the "safeness" making the binding shitty

May 26 2005 6:17PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)