members online
President Obama says very strange things, especially for a guy who presumably wants very badly to be re-elected. As if it wasn’t enough that he last week went off on small business owners for having pride in their accomplishments, this week he actually told a rally audience in reference to the economy – with a straight face – “We tried our plan, and it worked.”
It almost seems gratuitous to start citing all the numbers that obliterate this claim – the 8.2 percent unemployment, the anemic 1.5 percent GDP growth this past quarter, the soaring federal deficit that will top $1 trillion yet again this year. It’s like when the head coach of a 1-15 NFL team tries to make the case that his team is really good. Why sit there and debate him? You just nod your head and think to yourself, “Whatever you say, Coach.”
Yet I think Obama demonstrates something important about himself, and about many politicians like him, when he makes such a claim. For certain people who are so deeply steeped in their ideology, their plan cannot conceivably have failed because their ideas are correct by definition. If they tried their plan and the economy is still awful, it must be because someone else came along and messed up their unassailable brilliance.
The stimulus didn’t produce enough economic growth? Republicans wouldn’t let them spend even more!
The deficit is still out of control? Republicans won’t let them raise taxes on the rich!
Unemployment is still way too high? Greedy businesses are hording cash and not hiring people!
Regulation is crushing business growth? Those horrible CEOs need to stop resisting the government’s wise rules and do what they’re told.
When you’re convinced from the start that your ideas are foolproof, and that any failure must be the result of sabotage, then you’re relieved of the burden of ever re-assessing your ideas. They can’t possibly be the problem! They’re right!
Of course, in spite of the fact that Obama makes all of the above excuses, he does not acknowledge that overall failure has occurred. Remember, “It worked.” That’s what he said.
And this is the other side of the pathological equation. You and I look at the horrible numbers and say, “That sure doesn’t look like success to me.” All Obama has to do is claim the numbers would have been even worse without his policies. It’s absurd but you can’t prove it’s untrue, so it’s good enough for him. He can point to the collapse of the mortgage market, the sharp decline in GDP that occurred during the fourth quarter of 2008 and the rapid collapse that was occurring when he took office – and then he can claim to have stemmed the tide.
When you point out that this is the weakest economic recovery in a century, he and his supporters claim that the so-called “Great Recession” was a unique and special event and that the usual rapid recovery we see after recessions should have not been expected in this case.
Of course, the Obama Administration’s own predictions belie that claim. They said in 2009 that they needed to pass the stimulus to keep unemployment from topping 8 percent. After the stimulus passed, it soared above 10 percent and still hasn’t fallen below 8 percent. Oops! They predicted that economic growth this year would be 3 percent. Halfway through the year, it’s less than 2 percent and it’s just about statistically impossible it will get anywhere near 3 percent. Never mind!
This is failure no matter how you cut it. But you can’t tell that to Obama and his economic team. They decided long ago that their ideas never fail and cannot fail. You picture Obama like the mad professor standing alone in his lab and looking befuddled because his latest concoction didn’t perform whatever magic function he was expecting: “No! It can’t be wrong! It has to work!”
That mad professor is going to try the same concoction again and again, convinced that he will get the result he wants – no matter how brutally the facts smack him in the face. And if re-elected, Obama will do the same. Even now, when he desperately needs to come up with something that will sell the voters on re-electing him, all he can come up with is more spending proposals and more class warfare. It’s the same stuff he’s been doing since he took office, and the rest of us can see that it hasn’t worked – but don’t tell that to the mad professor.
He is always right. The problem is the rest of you – you ungrateful business owners, you rascally Republicans, you dumb people who don’t really know how much worse it would have been without Obama’s steady hand at the wheel.
The rest of us sit there with jaws on the floor, thinking, “Did he really say that?” But it makes perfect sense to the pathological mad professor who is sadly alone in recognizing his own brilliance.
;)
;)
;)
;)
Turd Sandwhich or Giant douche?
Thank God I live in Canada.
^Yeah because our choices are way better. People in Quebec voted in MP's who are still in university because they didn't know any better.
OP, did you write that? If not, nice cut and paste hack job, try coming up with your own opinions.
True but we're also not neccesarily stuck with the same guy for even blocks of four years and a deadlocked bi-partisan legislature. We have more functional mechanisms for keeping our politicians honest. These are a constitutional parliament with 3-4 major political parties representing various ends of the political spectrum, a dedicated shadow cabinet whose purpose is to critique and hold those in power accountable and at the very extreme, majority votes of non-confidence to oust poor leadership. We are far from perfect, granted. Especially considering the in-effectiveness of minority governments which we're prone to forming. Still its not like that shitmess south of the border.
That and our national media actually benefits from constructive input from intelligent commentators without relying too-greatly on commercial entertainment and fear mongering. I'd say as a Canadian its easier to find informed debate than it is in the US.
Well I appreciate yourl-out: I answered too simply. I'm Canadian so correct- its '39-'45. Major American involvement and economic upturn didnt take place until 41, though. The lend-lease program signed on March '41 began a comprehensive liquid and mateiral loan program between the States and Britain. You are not correct though in assuming it was never paid back as beginning in 1951 repayment was to be stretched out over 50 annual payments, starting with five years of deferred payments, at 2% interest.The final payment of $83.3 million due on 31 December 2006 (repayment having been deferred in the allowed five years), was made on 29 December 2006. After this final payment Britain's Economic Secretary formally thanked the U.S. for its wartime support.
There is the tricky issue of the post-war Marshall Plan, much of which wasnt re-paid but by that time as you correctly stated, Europe was a wholesome market for US indistrial goods.
Im not trying to compare WW2 to 'Murca world police. I will say however that local and state economies do benefit from the mass-production of wartime goods (military indistrial complex) I'm not however making any informed judgement on the ethics of that as this is not the appropriate thread.
Bumper Sticker Decal Anti Obama Bumper Sticker – Broke No More Change Decal $1.75 Anti Obama Bumper Sticker Decal – Hope Is Fading $1.75 EPISCOPAL CHURCH Flag car bumper sticker decal 5″ x 3″ $3.00 Anti Obama Bumper Sticker Decal – So Far He Sucks $1.75 Anti Obama Bumper Sticker Decal – ObamaCare Health Care $1.75 Anti Obama Bumper Sticker Decal – Obama Douche $1.75 Patriotic bumper [...]
I spent 2 days driving in the presidential motorcade and discussing guerrilla marketing with president Obama.
In late April, President Obama gave a speech at the University of Colorado at Boulder. While he was there, he met up with David Lesh, a skier and the ...
And loves him some Glenn Beck.[IMG]http://media.nscdn.com/uploads/images/1/00/00/50/63/5063.jpeg[/IMG]
