Newschoolers
Newschoolers
Twitter Facebook Fan
   
  1. Home
    • Hot (New!)
    • Latest (New!)
    • Top Rated (New!)
    • Video of the Day
    • Video of the Week
    • Video of the Month
  2. News
    • Features
    • Top Rated (New!)
    • Interviews
    • Events
    • Opinions
    • Industry News
    • Site
    • Product Info
    • Press Releases
  3. Forums
    • Site Discussion
    • Ski Gabber
    • Non-Ski Gabber
    • Media & Arts
    • Regionals
    • Cults
    • Gear Talk
    • Sell/Trade
    • WTB
  4. Pictures
    • Big Mountain
    • Halfpipe
    • Trending
    • Top Rated
    • Latest
    • Jumps
    • Rails
    • Sequences
    • Crash
    • Ski Equipment
  5. Videos
    • Summer
    • Jumps
    • Edits
    • Trending
    • Latest
    • Top Rated
    • Rails
    • Halfpipe
    • Big Mountain
    • Crash
    • Trailers
  6. Community
    • Reviews
    • Events
    • Polls
    • Games
    • Donate!
    • Top Rated Members
    • Cults
  7. NSTV
    • Chug Life
    • 4bi9
    • Traveling Circus
    • Salomon FSTV
    • The Weak
    • Westward
    • COC TV
    • K2 TV
    • 4FRNT TV
    • Inspired TV
  8. Contests
  9. Gear
    • Sell and Trade
    • Gear Talk
    • Reviews
    • Subscribe to Powder
  10. Store
Home News Forums Pictures Videos
Login to NS   |   Lost your password?   |   Register for NS
Lost your password? | Register for NS
Online

members online

GH2 molesting the 5dIII - Media And Arts - Forums

preload preload preload
Score: 0
 
 
<< First < Prev  1   2   3  Next > Last >>
<< Back to thread listing
Subject: GH2 molesting the 5dIII
  • 0
DowntofilmUltimate Bling!
Karma : 767328
6517 Posts
No Life
icon
Jun 12 2012
1:00:31AM
http://www.eoshd.com/content/7722/5d-mark-iii-vs-gh2-vs-nex-7

5D Mark III vs GH2 and NEX 7 from Andrew Reid on Vimeo.



Thats also without any firmware hacks.

Word.
Facebook Fan Page:
www.facebook.com/down2film

Downtofilm's vimeo:
www.vimeo.com/downtofilm

-----------------------------

Sandy Boville edit = multiple orgasms. So thank you for that. Not even girls can do that to me. - I.B
  • 0
1337Ultimate Bling!
Karma: 1288007
28000 Posts
@th1337
icon
Jun 13 2012
1:22:47PM
Quoting VT_scratch$ from Jun 13 2012 1:07:12:
ay ay I film skiing with the gh1 !!! but yoh, for a really wide lens what would you suggest? I currently have whatever came with the cam, a 14-42 lumix lens with auto focus and shit, and then a nikon adapter to 4/3 with a standard nikon 50mm on it. yes the 14mm is nice n wide, but id love to try something even wider when I have some money. http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/833415-REG/Bower_SLY75B43_7_5mm_f_3_5_FISHEYE_LENS.html is this the best way to go? or would it be worth it trying to get a nikon lens to use with my adapter? i don't know too much about glass quality, but i do know the same factory builds that 7.5mm lens for VARIOUS photo companies. thoughts? suggestions?
I've seen a lot on SP that the 7.5 (rokinon brand) is the best fisheye for it by a mile!

http://forums.skateperception.com/index.php?/topic/296513-gh1-fisheye-question/
-- Jamie
§ http://surfaceskis.com § http://el33tskier.tumblr.com §
--EASTERN SAMPLE----B.M.I.T.R.--
if i wanna see dudes and chicks doing drugs and each other, while tearing their lives apart from the inside, ill watch antiques roadshow
sammyj
It's the "ON3P is the best" attitude that most ON3P skiers have...
chaitea
☭
  • 0
1337Ultimate Bling!
Karma: 1288007
28000 Posts
@th1337
icon
Jun 13 2012
1:53:31PM
Also, for a gh2, it's rather "budget friendly" for a nice setup:

GH2 body - $700 (used)
Samyang 7.5 fisheye - $300 (new)
Nikon 80-200 2.8 two touch - $900 (used in great condition, can be had cheaper)
Tokina 11-16 2.8 nikon mount - $600 (used)
Panasonic 25 1.4 - $650 (used)
Tamron 17-50 2.8 nikon mount - $330 (used)

700
300
900
600
650
300
-----
3450

all said and done thats a really good deal...
-- Jamie
§ http://surfaceskis.com § http://el33tskier.tumblr.com §
--EASTERN SAMPLE----B.M.I.T.R.--
if i wanna see dudes and chicks doing drugs and each other, while tearing their lives apart from the inside, ill watch antiques roadshow
sammyj
It's the "ON3P is the best" attitude that most ON3P skiers have...
chaitea
☭
  • 0
Plorr$
Karma: 55070
2835 Posts
Addict
icon
Jun 13 2012
2:15:21PM
Quoting VT_scratch$ from Jun 13 2012 1:07:12:
ay ay I film skiing with the gh1 !!! but yoh, for a really wide lens what would you suggest? I currently have whatever came with the cam, a 14-42 lumix lens with auto focus and shit, and then a nikon adapter to 4/3 with a standard nikon 50mm on it. yes the 14mm is nice n wide, but id love to try something even wider when I have some money. http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/833415-REG/Bower_SLY75B43_7_5mm_f_3_5_FISHEYE_LENS.html is this the best way to go? or would it be worth it trying to get a nikon lens to use with my adapter? i don't know too much about glass quality, but i do know the same factory builds that 7.5mm lens for VARIOUS photo companies. thoughts? suggestions?
I decided to bite the bullet on the Lumix 7-14 f4 and I've gotten great results with it. By far the best build quality and image quality of any native m43 lens I've used. Only issues are it doesn't accept filters and is relatively slow. Other than that the Nikon version of the Tokina 11-16 2.8 would be a good slightly cheaper choice.
moving pictures: http://vimeo.com/plorr
still pictures: http://www.flickr.com/photos/plorr/

Keep skiing weird.
  • 0
Pandysloo
Karma: 204336
20312 Posts
@th1337
icon
Jun 13 2012
2:39:50PM
I'll upload some skiing/lens samples when I get back from the dentist. Tooth decay is no laughing matter.
Surface Skis
www.surfaceskis.com
Causwell
www.causwell.com
  • 0
Pandysloo
Karma: 204336
20312 Posts
@th1337
icon
Jun 13 2012
2:41:38PM
Quoting VT_scratch$ from Jun 13 2012 1:07:12:
thoughts? suggestions?
The two best UWA for m4/3 are the Olympus 12mm f2 and the Tokina 11-16 2.8. The Olympus has really good autofocus from what I hear (could be useful if you're shooting a glidecam), and it has full compatibility with the GH2. On the other hand, I went with the Tokina because it's simply the closest you can get to cinema glass in a wide angle.
Surface Skis
www.surfaceskis.com
Causwell
www.causwell.com
  • 0
ThunderousFilms
Karma: 47925
663 Posts
Ridiculous
icon
Jun 13 2012
2:52:30PM
Quoting BikeMlatt42069$ from Jun 13 2012 12:09:31:
Someone should post some ski edits shots by a gh2
https://vimeo.com/37002436


https://vimeo.com/32371578


https://vimeo.com/39314067


https://vimeo.com/33894300


My buddy makes some amazing edits with the GH2, that being said the files type that the GH2 uses are a bitch compared to my 7d files in post before you convert them.
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Thunderous-Films/199589764186 - Thunderous Films

http://firstdropouterwear.com/ - First Drop Outerwear
  • 0
Plorr$
Karma: 55070
2835 Posts
Addict
icon
Jun 13 2012
3:30:33PM
Quoting ThunderousFilms from Jun 13 2012 2:52:30:
the files type that the GH2 uses are a bitch compared to my 7d files in post before you convert them.
I think the workflow is actually easier than a canon DSLR. No need to use mpegstreamclip or anything like that. I just log and transfer to prores right from the SD card in FCP7.
moving pictures: http://vimeo.com/plorr
still pictures: http://www.flickr.com/photos/plorr/

Keep skiing weird.
  • 0
photodouche69
Karma: 169358
6170 Posts
No Life
icon
Jun 13 2012
3:38:45PM
Quoting 1337Ultimate Bling! from Jun 13 2012 1:22:47:
I've seen a lot on SP that the 7.5 (rokinon brand) is the best fisheye for it by a mile! http://forums.skateperception.com/index.php?/topic/296513-gh1-fisheye-question/
Yeah, I posted a link to it earlier. So many skate filmers' use a gh2 these days.
http://zbphoto.ca/
http://blog.zbphoto.ca/
Instagram: @zb_photo
  • 0
WillStart$
Karma: 256030
4004 Posts
No Life
icon
Jun 13 2012
4:04:35PM
Quoting Plorr$ from Jun 13 2012 3:30:33:
I think the workflow is actually easier than a canon DSLR. No need to use mpegstreamclip or anything like that. I just log and transfer to prores right from the SD card in FCP7.
you can do that in FCP with a canon DSLR too, right? you just need a plug-in i think
Will Start
Soul Crew.
Sports Creel.
Windells.
-Check out Soul Crew on Facebook:
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Soul-Crew/160969890616254?ref=ts
-Vimeo:
http://vimeo.com/willstart
-Youtube:
http://www.youtube.com/user/deschdogg?feature=mhee
  • 0
DowntofilmUltimate Bling!
Karma: 767328
6517 Posts
No Life
icon
Jun 13 2012
4:16:56PM
Quoting WillStart$ from Jun 13 2012 4:04:35:
you can do that in FCP with a canon DSLR too, right? you just need a plug-in i think
this is what I do
Facebook Fan Page:
www.facebook.com/down2film

Downtofilm's vimeo:
www.vimeo.com/downtofilm

-----------------------------

Sandy Boville edit = multiple orgasms. So thank you for that. Not even girls can do that to me. - I.B
  • 0
DowntofilmUltimate Bling!
Karma: 767328
6517 Posts
No Life
icon
Jun 13 2012
4:35:11PM
Quoting 1337Ultimate Bling! from Jun 13 2012 1:53:31:
Also, for a gh2, it's rather "budget friendly" for a nice setup: GH2 body - $700 (used) Samyang 7.5 fisheye - $300 (new) Nikon 80-200 2.8 two touch - $900 (used in great condition, can be had cheaper) Tokina 11-16 2.8 nikon mount - $600 (used) Panasonic 25 1.4 - $650 (used) Tamron 17-50 2.8 nikon mount - $330 (used) 700 300 900 600 650 300 ----- 3450 all said and done thats a really good deal...
Thinking of making the Nikon switch.

GH3 or Fs-700
Nikon 80-200 2.8
Nikon 24-70 2.8
Tokina 11-16 Nikon mount (does it have an aperture ring?)

Facebook Fan Page:
www.facebook.com/down2film

Downtofilm's vimeo:
www.vimeo.com/downtofilm

-----------------------------

Sandy Boville edit = multiple orgasms. So thank you for that. Not even girls can do that to me. - I.B
  • 0
Tgar1024
Karma: 19768
705 Posts
Ridiculous
icon
Jun 13 2012
4:45:48PM
Alright so I am no expert on photo/video (not even close) and I'm not trying to be a troll, but I have been in the game for long enough that I have realized now that what you shoot on (your body not lens) really does not make all that difference (until you get above the $5,000 bar).

The difference between a d3200, a Gh2, a t2i, 5d or a 7d or any other dslr is honestly not going to make any difference that will be visible to a viewer. The main importance of shooting is your flow, angles, and vital settings (exposure, Frame rate, etc) with that in mind I really don't think one of the listed above cameras would be able to "outdo" another one of them based on the tiny spec differences. the only way one of these cameras could outdo another one of these cameras is by the shooter himself.

With all of this in mind my point is to say that why is there all this talk of one camera crushing another one or why does everyone want to hop onto the crowd of one camera because it has a small spec different from their current camera, When in all reality any one of the above listed cameras could create a video that would be "professional".


Like us on FB
http://www.facebook.com/BolderProductions
Check out my videos
https://vimeo.com/user10361105
Check out our blog
http://bolderproductions.blogspot.com/
  • 0
NPFilm
Karma: 138809
2544 Posts
Addict
icon
Jun 13 2012
5:17:40PM
wow thats a crazy difference!
RIP Sarah Burke, CRJ and Shane McConkey
  • 0
erikK$
Karma: 27470
2122 Posts
Addict
icon
Jun 13 2012
5:22:19PM
Quoting DowntofilmUltimate Bling! from Jun 13 2012 4:35:11:
Tokina 11-16 Nikon mount (does it have an aperture ring?)
nope :(
Call Me Maybe is actually one of the best songs I've ever heard in my life on this planet. -*simba*


http://vimeo.com/user2810712/videos
http://www.flickr.com/photos/48583718@N06/
  • 0
[J_Gasper]$
Karma: 76225
2796 Posts
Addict
icon
Jun 13 2012
5:24:27PM
Quoting erikK$ from Jun 13 2012 5:22:19:
nope :(
so im confused how the fuck you would change your aperture then
Because I'm from the suburbs, not Compton. And you look like an idiot when you are all thugged out in the parking lot waiting for Mom to pick you up in her Lexus crossover.


http://vimeo.com/user8219966/videos
  • 0
photodouche69
Karma: 169358
6170 Posts
No Life
icon
Jun 13 2012
5:26:26PM
Quoting erikK$ from Jun 13 2012 5:22:19:
nope :(
But there's an adapter than can control it. Ask landis.
http://zbphoto.ca/
http://blog.zbphoto.ca/
Instagram: @zb_photo
  • 0
1337Ultimate Bling!
Karma: 1288007
28000 Posts
@th1337
icon
Jun 13 2012
5:31:13PM
Quoting DowntofilmUltimate Bling! from Jun 13 2012 4:35:11:
Thinking of making the Nikon switch. GH3 or Fs-700 Nikon 80-200 2.8 Nikon 24-70 2.8 Tokina 11-16 Nikon mount (does it have an aperture ring?)
nikon controls its aperture mechanically, not electronically like canon does. So you just need an adapter that has a lever to push the aperture lever
-- Jamie
§ http://surfaceskis.com § http://el33tskier.tumblr.com §
--EASTERN SAMPLE----B.M.I.T.R.--
if i wanna see dudes and chicks doing drugs and each other, while tearing their lives apart from the inside, ill watch antiques roadshow
sammyj
It's the "ON3P is the best" attitude that most ON3P skiers have...
chaitea
☭
  • 0
Mkvackay$
Karma: 209644
1485 Posts
Insane
icon
Jun 13 2012
6:18:29PM
Quoting ThunderousFilms from Jun 13 2012 2:52:30:
https://vimeo.com/37002436 https://vimeo.com/32371578 https://vimeo.com/39314067 https://vimeo.com/33894300 My buddy makes some amazing edits with the GH2, that being said the files type that the GH2 uses are a bitch compared to my 7d files in post before you convert them.
yea durand kills it. still don't know what the hell his v-pod looks like but it seems to work well
http://vimeo.com/28514795 -- winter 2011 ski reel

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yqkibhktodA -- Urban blind 4 to hang
  • 0
Pandysloo
Karma: 204336
20312 Posts
@th1337
icon
Jun 13 2012
6:34:28PM
Quoting Tgar1024 from Jun 13 2012 4:45:48:
The difference between a d3200, a Gh2, a t2i, 5d or a 7d or any other dslr is honestly not going to make any difference that will be visible to a viewer.
I hear this argument time and time again, and it's nonsense. I don't make videos to please others, and I don't justify mediocrity just because I know I can technically get away with it. You have to take into account how we as artists wish to evolve our craft for personal satisfaction, not just whether or not people will accept us.

That said, if you can't make pleasing images with a t2i, a GH2 isn't going to change anything. However if you're constantly find yourself restricted by certain aspects of your camera, then there's nothing wrong with switching to a tool that suits the job.

Surface Skis
www.surfaceskis.com
Causwell
www.causwell.com
  • 0
photodouche69
Karma: 169358
6170 Posts
No Life
icon
Jun 13 2012
6:41:07PM
^this so much!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
http://zbphoto.ca/
http://blog.zbphoto.ca/
Instagram: @zb_photo
  • 0
1337Ultimate Bling!
Karma: 1288007
28000 Posts
@th1337
icon
Jun 13 2012
6:51:35PM
EOShd or eosusers or whatever that site is called is also a huge fanboy of the lumix systems. Will do whatever, whenever to bash canon products now. It's humorous!

also also, @landis, I believe sometimes the slight quality gain from ditching an entire system and switching to another can be more of a hassle then anything else. For those that do work for clients, if they are happy with the quality they see, and couldn't tell the difference between a 5d III or a gh2, then why waste the money and huge time/effort to sell everything you have and get a new setup, for a slight edge that only you'll appreciate? I think this is what that kid was getting at, although I do agree with you about the whole self pleasure aspect.
-- Jamie
§ http://surfaceskis.com § http://el33tskier.tumblr.com §
--EASTERN SAMPLE----B.M.I.T.R.--
if i wanna see dudes and chicks doing drugs and each other, while tearing their lives apart from the inside, ill watch antiques roadshow
sammyj
It's the "ON3P is the best" attitude that most ON3P skiers have...
chaitea
☭
  • 0
Pandysloo
Karma: 204336
20312 Posts
@th1337
icon
Jun 13 2012
7:22:43PM
Quoting 1337Ultimate Bling! from Jun 13 2012 6:51:35:
EOShd or eosusers or whatever that site is called is also a huge fanboy of the lumix systems. Will do whatever, whenever to bash canon products now. It's humorous! also also, @landis, I believe sometimes the slight quality gain from ditching an entire system and switching to another can be more of a hassle then anything else. For those that do work for clients, if they are happy with the quality they see, and couldn't tell the difference between a 5d III or a gh2, then why waste the money and huge time/effort to sell everything you have and get a new setup, for a slight edge that only you'll appreciate? I think this is what that kid was getting at, although I do agree with you about the whole self pleasure aspect.
1. GH2 is all around cheaper to work with, unless you need to switch after investing all your money into closed-system glass (Canon), in which case that's a user error. And even then, your lenses should hold their value, so switching isn't expensive nor is it difficult.

2. Again, you can get away with doing commercial work using an iPhone. Normal people can't tell the difference between Planet Earth footage and GoPro footage. The US as a culture is particularly guilty of this design injustice: make the most money off the cheapest product (the fruits of capitalism, right?). Look at Japan where every little detail of every street sign and door hinge was consciously designed. Could they have gotten away with something trashy or boring? Yes, but they tend to go the extra mile and as a result Japanese civilization is largely more pleasant to look at from a design perspective. The same applies to video; if you're just selling pixels rather than art, then you might as well choose a different job with better pay.

3. EOShd is just as much of a circlejerk as any other site. I think the reason why I hate talking to people about cameras in general is because people already seem to have made up their mind, usually revolving around brand loyalty as if everything in life needs to have some form of "team" dichotomy to it. It's one thing to prefer products of a certain brand, but I won't hesitate to criticize and sell my $3000+ investment if I'm not pleased with it.

Thing is, comparing the GH2 to any Canon DSLR really is apples to oranges. You can prefer one over the other, but it is a matter of fact that the GH2 is technologically superior to the Canon DSLRs. That's why I made the switch, and lo and behold, I ended up slapping myself in the head for not switching sooner. However, Canon DSLRs are still cameras first and foremost, so it only makes sense that still photography is where they outshine the GH2.
Surface Skis
www.surfaceskis.com
Causwell
www.causwell.com
  • 0
Pandysloo
Karma: 204336
20312 Posts
@th1337
icon
Jun 13 2012
7:56:16PM
Quoting Pandysloo from Jun 13 2012 2:39:50:
I'll upload some skiing/lens samples when I get back from the dentist. Tooth decay is no laughing matter.
All the follow cams were shot with the Tokina 11-16 @ 14mm or 16mm. The stationary wide shot of Durtschi (after the flag) was at 11mm. The shirtless dude was the Lumix 20mm 1.7, and the telephoto shot of Mt. Hood was my Pentax SMC 50mm 1.4 in ETC mode (4x crop factor total).

Password: boourns

Boggle Tournament? from Landis Tanaka on Vimeo.




This was shot with mostly the Lumix 20mm 1.7, and the long shots were the Pentax 50mm in ETC mode.

Rainy Daydream from Landis Tanaka on Vimeo.

Surface Skis
www.surfaceskis.com
Causwell
www.causwell.com
  • 0
1337Ultimate Bling!
Karma: 1288007
28000 Posts
@th1337
icon
Jun 13 2012
8:12:25PM
Quoting Pandysloo from Jun 13 2012 7:22:43:
1. GH2 is all around cheaper to work with, unless you need to switch after investing all your money into closed-system glass (Canon), in which case that's a user error. And even then, your lenses should hold their value, so switching isn't expensive nor is it difficult. 2. Again, you can get away with doing commercial work using an iPhone. Normal people can't tell the difference between Planet Earth footage and GoPro footage. The US as a culture is particularly guilty of this design injustice: make the most money off the cheapest product (the fruits of capitalism, right?). Look at Japan where every little detail of every street sign and door hinge was consciously designed. Could they have gotten away with something trashy or boring? Yes, but they tend to go the extra mile and as a result Japanese civilization is largely more pleasant to look at from a design perspective. The same applies to video; if you're just selling pixels rather than art, then you might as well choose a different job with better pay. 3. EOShd is just as much of a circlejerk as any other site. I think the reason why I hate talking to people about cameras in general is because people already seem to have made up their mind, usually revolving around brand loyalty as if everything in life needs to have some form of "team" dichotomy to it. It's one thing to prefer products of a certain brand, but I won't hesitate to criticize and sell my $3000+ investment if I'm not pleased with it. Thing is, comparing the GH2 to any Canon DSLR really is apples to oranges. You can prefer one over the other, but it is a matter of fact that the GH2 is technologically superior to the Canon DSLRs. That's why I made the switch, and lo and behold, I ended up slapping myself in the head for not switching sooner. However, Canon DSLRs are still cameras first and foremost, so it only makes sense that still photography is where they outshine the GH2.
valid points you make, and yes, the GH2 is the superior camera in terms of resolution and image quality.

I mean, for me personally, I'm invested in Canon. I like their stuff from a photography standpoint, and am pleased enough with their video side to see no reason to switch. I'm used to the canon interface that taking the time to relearn nikon would be annoying, and having to replace everything from lenses/bodies down to flash triggers and batteries would be an absolute nightmare (the time it takes to sell everything on a used market and keep my loses to a minium would take forever, having to get good deals would add another chunk of time, etc)

But hey, if I wasn't such a gearwhore and wasn't trying to actually get out and shoot for once, I'd probably consider the switch! Nikon glass has been tempting me for a while...
-- Jamie
§ http://surfaceskis.com § http://el33tskier.tumblr.com §
--EASTERN SAMPLE----B.M.I.T.R.--
if i wanna see dudes and chicks doing drugs and each other, while tearing their lives apart from the inside, ill watch antiques roadshow
sammyj
It's the "ON3P is the best" attitude that most ON3P skiers have...
chaitea
☭
  • 0
Tgar1024
Karma: 19768
705 Posts
Ridiculous
icon
Jun 13 2012
8:23:48PM
Im wasn't saying that you would get the same results with any camera but between the best canon, nikon, sony, and panasonic HDSLRs the difference is so small that I wouldn't see any difference in my own resolution, I totally agree that you shoot for your own enjoyment and pride but you can throw as good of stuff together with a 7d as you can with a gh2. Conditions would have to be EXACT to be able to tell the difference between the resolution of one vs the other.
Like us on FB
http://www.facebook.com/BolderProductions
Check out my videos
https://vimeo.com/user10361105
Check out our blog
http://bolderproductions.blogspot.com/
  • 0
Pandysloo
Karma: 204336
20312 Posts
@th1337
icon
Jun 13 2012
8:39:13PM
Quoting Tgar1024 from Jun 13 2012 8:23:48:
Conditions would have to be EXACT to be able to tell the difference between the resolution of one vs the other.
I would say the difference is pretty large. I that might be the case with poorly compressed web video, but even in most instances I can immediately recognize whether a vimeo video was shot with a GH2 or a 5D.

The Canon DSLRs are ~700 lines, and the GH2 is ~900 lines. Not a big number, but definitely noticeable. Watching uncompressed footage on a 48" TV via HDMI, the difference in resolution between the GH2 and the 5Dmk2 is ginormous. Of course, other aspects go into perceived resolution as well. For instance, the GH2's cleaner noise and lack of moirι give the image clarity. You can actually turn up the sharpness without having moirι ruin the shot.


Surface Skis
www.surfaceskis.com
Causwell
www.causwell.com
  • 0
photodouche69
Karma: 169358
6170 Posts
No Life
icon
Jun 13 2012
8:56:03PM
Honestly, the difference between the two cameras would be so small that your BIAS towards one or the other would take over. So many factors such as lenses, editing (codecs/compression), your skill, light, and weather would make more of a difference; it's truly apples and oranges.


What isn't apples and oranges is a gh2 vs film.

FIlm >>> sushi >>>poop >>> t2i >>> gh2

#fucklandis
#fuckmefuckyoufuckanythingthatisntfilm
http://zbphoto.ca/
http://blog.zbphoto.ca/
Instagram: @zb_photo
  • 0
Tgar1024
Karma: 19768
705 Posts
Ridiculous
icon
Jun 13 2012
9:01:11PM
Quoting photodouche69 from Jun 13 2012 8:56:03:
Honestly, the difference between the two cameras would be so small that your BIAS towards one or the other would take over. So many factors such as lenses, editing (codecs/compression), your skill, light, and weather would make more of a difference; it's truly apples and oranges.
.
Like us on FB
http://www.facebook.com/BolderProductions
Check out my videos
https://vimeo.com/user10361105
Check out our blog
http://bolderproductions.blogspot.com/
  • 0
DowntofilmUltimate Bling!
Karma: 767328
6517 Posts
No Life
icon
Jun 13 2012
9:06:18PM
Quoting photodouche69 from Jun 13 2012 8:56:03:
Honestly, the difference between the two cameras would be so small that your BIAS towards one or the other would take over. So many factors such as lenses, editing (codecs/compression), your skill, light, and weather would make more of a difference; it's truly apples and oranges. What isn't apples and oranges is a gh2 vs film. FIlm >>> sushi >>>poop >>> t2i >>> gh2 #fucklandis #fuckmefuckyoufuckanythingthatisntfilm
Click for larger image

I found a picture of you.

Facebook Fan Page:
www.facebook.com/down2film

Downtofilm's vimeo:
www.vimeo.com/downtofilm

-----------------------------

Sandy Boville edit = multiple orgasms. So thank you for that. Not even girls can do that to me. - I.B
  • 0
photodouche69
Karma: 169358
6170 Posts
No Life
icon
Jun 13 2012
9:30:45PM
Quoting DowntofilmUltimate Bling! from Jun 13 2012 9:06:18:
Click for larger image I found a picture of you.
Click for larger image

I found a picture of you.
http://zbphoto.ca/
http://blog.zbphoto.ca/
Instagram: @zb_photo
  • 0
erikK$
Karma: 27470
2122 Posts
Addict
icon
Jun 14 2012
1:43:30AM
Quoting photodouche69 from Jun 13 2012 5:26:26:
But there's an adapter than can control it. Ask landis.
i know, it's just unfortunate since the adapters that can control aperture are more expensive and you don't actually know which f stop you're using.
Call Me Maybe is actually one of the best songs I've ever heard in my life on this planet. -*simba*


http://vimeo.com/user2810712/videos
http://www.flickr.com/photos/48583718@N06/
  • 0
npm$
Karma: 188351
10268 Posts
Crazy Fool
icon
Jun 14 2012
3:39:21AM
Quoting Pandysloo from Jun 13 2012 7:22:43:
usually revolving around brand loyalty as if everything in life needs to have some form of "team" dichotomy to it.
wait, are you saying you weren't on Canon's Varsity team? I'm thoroughly confused now.
www.nickmeilleur.tumblr.com
www.epochapparel.com
www.rimeknits.com/home.html
www.unithreads.com
  • 0
ehvUltimate Bling!
Karma: 871638
41983 Posts
Basement Dweller
icon
Jun 14 2012
3:58:22AM
Quoting ThunderousFilms from Jun 13 2012 2:52:30:
that being said the files type that the GH2 uses are a bitch compared to my 7d files in post before you convert them.
avchd > h264... just saying. Every time I have to use a h264 shot, i want to slice my wrists. Its the worst fucking codec, yet canon keeps pumping out their dslrs using it. avchd is surprisingly easy to use and yes you do have to convert it, but if you're not converting your h264 to a friendlier codec, get learned. Even coming from 422 dvcprohd, 420 avchd holds up pretty well. h264 does not.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Evan Heath Visual
www.evanheathvisual.com
Facebook Page, gimme a like!
http://www.facebook.com/EvanHeathVisual

"she spins left because she has no rights" - Su[G]ar
  • 0
TWoods
Karma: 549444
9584 Posts
Crazy Fool
icon
Jun 14 2012
5:08:14AM
Quoting Pandysloo from Jun 13 2012 6:34:28:
I don't make videos to please others, and I don't justify mediocrity just because I know I can technically get away with it. You have to take into account how we as artists wish to evolve our craft for personal satisfaction, not just whether or not people will accept us.
Thanks for that, I completely agree with this. I can easily see the difference in the footage, and if you're at a level where what's holding you back is your gear, it's time for new gear.

want my work to be the best it can be for my standards, if the client doesn't notice, I don't care, because I do.
on3p
4bi9

  • 0
Metropolis
Karma: 90884
190 Posts
Pro
icon
Jun 14 2012
5:18:18PM
Quoting ehvUltimate Bling! from Jun 14 2012 3:58:22:
h264
#HDSLRproblems
Check it OUT!
http://www.newschoolers.com/membervideos/146301.0/MetropolisMedia
  • 0
SkionSanders$
Karma: 44856
2149 Posts
Addict
icon
Jun 15 2012
5:12:20AM
Im pretty sure Im gonna wait until the GH3 comes out in August, anybody have any idea if thats gonna be a lot more expensive than the gh2??
AvS
/..\
  • 0
MatRichUltimate Bling!
Karma: 220124
4713 Posts
No Life
icon
Jun 16 2012
11:23:47AM
alright heres my thing, for the last 2 years I have been thinking like this thread in general... what amazing piece of gear can I get to make my videos look better.

I have been shooting 7D for 2 years now and I have thought about adding to my kit, even changing it for "superior systems" like fs100, GH2, 5D...

I spent thousands of dallars building my kit with stabilizers, rigs, sound, lenses, sliders... Recently I changed my approach with film in general and with how I construct my kit.

It doesn't even come down to having a kit that makes your image look good or being able to get the appropriate settings and performance out of any camera. Its not about an image that will make people go "wow that is such amazing quality!"

Its not about settings or rules, sensor performance or lens quality ( to a certain extent)

Its about the narrative and visual quality of your work! Fuck gear fuck specs, the best, most impressive works I have seen could have been shot on an old cellphone and I still would have been amazed.

People should stop fussing so much with gear and start learning more about film language, how to construct a scene... any way to make your work step away from wow nice quality and move into the wow amazing work category.

That being said, a combination of this with a relative amount of quality is important or else the audience is distracted. there is no point however in fussing so much over it. The fact is, anything above and including a t3 is enough to retain the audiences attention so stop fussing about what better gear to get, what setting to use, and focus on what better technique to use so your work has impact!
Interior Crocodile aligator, I drive a chevrolet movie thee a-tor!

  • 0
Tgar1024
Karma: 19768
705 Posts
Ridiculous
icon
Jun 16 2012
12:18:54PM
Quoting MatRichUltimate Bling! from Jun 16 2012 11:23:47:
alright heres my thing, for the last 2 years I have been thinking like this thread in general... what amazing piece of gear can I get to make my videos look better. I have been shooting 7D for 2 years now and I have thought about adding to my kit, even changing it for "superior systems" like fs100, GH2, 5D... I spent thousands of dallars building my kit with stabilizers, rigs, sound, lenses, sliders... Recently I changed my approach with film in general and with how I construct my kit. It doesn't even come down to having a kit that makes your image look good or being able to get the appropriate settings and performance out of any camera. Its not about an image that will make people go "wow that is such amazing quality!" Its not about settings or rules, sensor performance or lens quality ( to a certain extent) Its about the narrative and visual quality of your work! Fuck gear fuck specs, the best, most impressive works I have seen could have been shot on an old cellphone and I still would have been amazed. People should stop fussing so much with gear and start learning more about film language, how to construct a scene... any way to make your work step away from wow nice quality and move into the wow amazing work category. That being said, a combination of this with a relative amount of quality is important or else the audience is distracted. there is no point however in fussing so much over it. The fact is, anything above and including a t3 is enough to retain the audiences attention so stop fussing about what better gear to get, what setting to use, and focus on what better technique to use so your work has impact!
EXACTLY! this is what i was trying to say above
Like us on FB
http://www.facebook.com/BolderProductions
Check out my videos
https://vimeo.com/user10361105
Check out our blog
http://bolderproductions.blogspot.com/
  • 0
.Max.
Karma: 71316
2943 Posts
Addict
icon
Jun 16 2012
12:55:02PM
Quoting MatRichUltimate Bling! from Jun 16 2012 11:23:47:
alright heres my thing, for the last 2 years I have been thinking like this thread in general... what amazing piece of gear can I get to make my videos look better. I have been shooting 7D for 2 years now and I have thought about adding to my kit, even changing it for "superior systems" like fs100, GH2, 5D... I spent thousands of dallars building my kit with stabilizers, rigs, sound, lenses, sliders... Recently I changed my approach with film in general and with how I construct my kit. It doesn't even come down to having a kit that makes your image look good or being able to get the appropriate settings and performance out of any camera. Its not about an image that will make people go "wow that is such amazing quality!" Its not about settings or rules, sensor performance or lens quality ( to a certain extent) Its about the narrative and visual quality of your work! Fuck gear fuck specs, the best, most impressive works I have seen could have been shot on an old cellphone and I still would have been amazed. People should stop fussing so much with gear and start learning more about film language, how to construct a scene... any way to make your work step away from wow nice quality and move into the wow amazing work category. That being said, a combination of this with a relative amount of quality is important or else the audience is distracted. there is no point however in fussing so much over it. The fact is, anything above and including a t3 is enough to retain the audiences attention so stop fussing about what better gear to get, what setting to use, and focus on what better technique to use so your work has impact!
This makes a lot of sense from a directors standpoint, I agree with everything you said. However there are people who love the technical aspects of filmmaking and earn satisfaction from getting the best possible image they can. There are a lot of elements in filmmaking and there is something for everyone, it's the art form that uses all other art forms.
CVU FREESTYLE

∆ http://www.flickr.com/photos/59233418@N04/ ∆ http://vimeo.com/maxwellerickson ∆
‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡

Ar§enic
  • 0
WillStart$
Karma: 256030
4004 Posts
No Life
icon
Jun 16 2012
1:05:39PM
Quoting .Max. from Jun 16 2012 12:55:02:
This makes a lot of sense from a directors standpoint, I agree with everything you said. However there are people who love the technical aspects of filmmaking and earn satisfaction from getting the best possible image they can. There are a lot of elements in filmmaking and there is something for everyone, it's the art form that uses all other art forms.
exactly.



i don't feel like i'm a filmmaker who's super concerned with story. i don't really care about being a director. i'm mainly interested in the visual aspect; in getting, as you said, the best possible image i can. so it's worth it to me to invest in gear that will bring me closer to that goal. shooting a great story on an iPhone would bring me far less artistic satisfaction.
Will Start
Soul Crew.
Sports Creel.
Windells.
-Check out Soul Crew on Facebook:
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Soul-Crew/160969890616254?ref=ts
-Vimeo:
http://vimeo.com/willstart
-Youtube:
http://www.youtube.com/user/deschdogg?feature=mhee
  • 0
Metropolis
Karma: 90884
190 Posts
Pro
icon
Jun 17 2012
11:10:04PM
Quoting MatRichUltimate Bling! from Jun 16 2012 11:23:47:
alright heres my thing, for the last 2 years I have been thinking like this thread in general... what amazing piece of gear can I get to make my videos look better. I have been shooting 7D for 2 years now and I have thought about adding to my kit, even changing it for "superior systems" like fs100, GH2, 5D... I spent thousands of dallars building my kit with stabilizers, rigs, sound, lenses, sliders... Recently I changed my approach with film in general and with how I construct my kit. It doesn't even come down to having a kit that makes your image look good or being able to get the appropriate settings and performance out of any camera. Its not about an image that will make people go "wow that is such amazing quality!" Its not about settings or rules, sensor performance or lens quality ( to a certain extent) Its about the narrative and visual quality of your work! Fuck gear fuck specs, the best, most impressive works I have seen could have been shot on an old cellphone and I still would have been amazed. People should stop fussing so much with gear and start learning more about film language, how to construct a scene... any way to make your work step away from wow nice quality and move into the wow amazing work category. That being said, a combination of this with a relative amount of quality is important or else the audience is distracted. there is no point however in fussing so much over it. The fact is, anything above and including a t3 is enough to retain the audiences attention so stop fussing about what better gear to get, what setting to use, and focus on what better technique to use so your work has impact!
I think maintaining an equal balance of everything is important from the standpoint of an independent filmmaker. People that find themselves obsessive over IQ and technical range play very important roles in production companies and other large firms.

Believing that advanced gear will improve your film-making is like believing that new skis will make your ski better... It's just foolish.
Check it OUT!
http://www.newschoolers.com/membervideos/146301.0/MetropolisMedia
  • 0
BakerpowUltimate Bling!
Karma: 229190
6232 Posts
No Life
icon
Jun 17 2012
11:18:11PM
Quoting WillStart$ from Jun 16 2012 1:05:39:
i don't feel like i'm a filmmaker who's super concerned with story. i don't really care about being a director. i'm mainly interested in the visual aspect; in getting, as you said, the best possible image i can. so it's worth it to me to invest in gear that will bring me closer to that goal. shooting a great story on an iPhone would bring me far less artistic satisfaction.
This.

I feel like when the subjects we are interested in filming are action based like skiing you move away from the "story" and focus more on perfecting colors, angles, sound etc.

when filming things more mundane it helps keep the viewer interested by providing a story.
"there are plenty of other fish in the sea. too bad you're nowhere near the sea. you're in the desert, alone." Soulskier

"I assumed hipsters liked to stretch their assholes, since it is defiantly not a popular thing to do." cobra_commander
  • 0
Pandysloo
Karma: 204336
20312 Posts
@th1337
icon
Jun 18 2012
3:09:31PM
Quoting MatRichUltimate Bling! from Jun 16 2012 11:23:47:
It doesn't even come down to having a kit that makes your image look good or being able to get the appropriate settings and performance out of any camera. Its not about an image that will make people go "wow that is such amazing quality!" Its not about settings or rules, sensor performance or lens quality ( to a certain extent) Its about the narrative and visual quality of your work! Fuck gear fuck specs, the best, most impressive works I have seen could have been shot on an old cellphone and I still would have been amazed.
I somewhat agree, and I somewhat disagree. For one, I reject the notion that the literary aspect of a film (story) is the golden priority. Some of us approach filmmaking in a more abstract fashion. The only reason I use a camera in the first place is because I don't have the patience to learn how to handle a paint brush. Yes, film is a temporal art form, and therefore people will always be concerned with the sequence of events. And yes, the way a story is conceptually depicted visually is important. I agree with all of those things.

But dismissing the importance of image quality just because "most people" will focus on the story isn't exactly fair. Filmmaking a team effort. The DP's job doesn't concern the integrity of the script; his only concern is illustrating it visually. And I would hope any self respecting DP is a perfectionist when it comes to IQ. He could use a cheap camera and get beautiful images (28 Days Later was shot on miniDV), but that doesn't mean that using the best tools possible is a fruitless endeavor. If that were the case, studios wouldn't bother financing billions of dollars of film stock, despite the fact that the average Joe can't discern the aesthetic difference between COPS and Children of Men.

It's a matter of using the right tool. For 98% of people on NS, a t2i and three lenses are more than enough. However if you're like me and find yourself cursing certain inescapable limitations of your gear for your style of shooting (my conflict of deep focus vs moirι), then you probably aren't using the right tool.

The truth is that the best gear will only allow you to work to your full potential, not further the boundaries of that potential itself. I'm being pedantic, but I feel many people in this thread are overshooting the crucial grey area of this subject.
Surface Skis
www.surfaceskis.com
Causwell
www.causwell.com
  • 0
ehvUltimate Bling!
Karma: 871638
41983 Posts
Basement Dweller
icon
Jun 18 2012
4:22:02PM
Quoting Pandysloo from Jun 18 2012 3:09:31:
t's a matter of using the right tool. For 98% of people on NS, a t2i and three lenses are more than enough. However if you're like me and find yourself cursing certain inescapable limitations of your gear for your style of shooting (my conflict of deep focus vs moirι), then you probably aren't using the right tool. The truth is that the best gear will only allow you to work to your full potential, not further the boundaries of that potential itself. I'm being pedantic, but I feel many people in this thread are overshooting the crucial grey area of this subject.
So I've been reading this thread and this topic of "buying gear makes you better" shit came up and ive been slightly avoiding it, not sure what to say about it. Landis hit the nail on the head for me. Saying you don't need a high quality image is true, but it depends on who you are. I had an hvx for while and i knew it was less sharp than a dslr and knew it wasn't true HD, etc. but i keep on going with my hvx because it worked well for me and i didnt want to compromise with a camera that had downfalls.

Them the af100/fs100 came out and it was the camera I always dreamed about, dslr with a professional video body. So i got one, it was expensive, but it was worth it to me. Has the quality of my edits increased? IQ yes, but i'd say this year was one of my best making edits, but it wasn't because of my camera. I went out, worked hard with riders, worked hard editing and pumped out a bunch of content that I was stoked on. I tried new things, I stuck with old things and i feel like i got a little better and i think i couldve done it with my hvx too.

Its all about the effort you put into your filmmaking and how you can effectively use the tool you have. I admit myself i get caught up in numbers and specs and shit too, but sometimes you just gotta forget about that and just film, thats the best part anyway.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Evan Heath Visual
www.evanheathvisual.com
Facebook Page, gimme a like!
http://www.facebook.com/EvanHeathVisual

"she spins left because she has no rights" - Su[G]ar
  • 0
.Max.
Karma: 71316
2943 Posts
Addict
icon
Jun 18 2012
8:22:13PM

Canon 5Dmk3 video review from Philip Bloom on Vimeo.



He talks about this issue.



For those too lazy to watch, he explains that the hacked GH2 is sharper, however it has that micro 4/3's sensor, meaning poor low light performance and increased lens lenghts. It's also plagued with a lower dynamic range. Because of the lack of aliasing on the 5diii you can apply sharpening in post and get an image almost indistinguishable (in sharpness) from the GH2's. Food for thought.
CVU FREESTYLE

∆ http://www.flickr.com/photos/59233418@N04/ ∆ http://vimeo.com/maxwellerickson ∆
‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡

Ar§enic
  • 0
erikK$
Karma: 27470
2122 Posts
Addict
icon
Jun 18 2012
8:43:43PM
Quoting .Max. from Jun 18 2012 8:22:13:
For those too lazy to watch, he explains that the hacked GH2 is sharper, however it has that micro 4/3's sensor, meaning poor low light performance and increased lens lenghts. It's also plagued with a lower dynamic range. Because of the lack of aliasing on the 5diii you can apply sharpening in post and get an image almost indistinguishable (in sharpness) from the GH2's. Food for thought.
and you can get all of this for 4x the price! wow!
Call Me Maybe is actually one of the best songs I've ever heard in my life on this planet. -*simba*


http://vimeo.com/user2810712/videos
http://www.flickr.com/photos/48583718@N06/
  • 0
.Max.
Karma: 71316
2943 Posts
Addict
icon
Jun 18 2012
8:55:48PM
Quoting erikK$ from Jun 18 2012 8:43:43:
and you can get all of this for 4x the price! wow!
Hahah I'm not arguing for either one. Just putting more information on the table.
CVU FREESTYLE

∆ http://www.flickr.com/photos/59233418@N04/ ∆ http://vimeo.com/maxwellerickson ∆
‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡‡

Ar§enic
  • 0
B.Taillefer
Karma: 48598
426 Posts
Ridiculous
icon
Jun 18 2012
9:15:41PM
Quoting .Max. from Jun 18 2012 8:55:48:
Hahah I'm not arguing for either one. Just putting more information on the table.
Although yes the smaller sensor size and 2x crop factor could be seen as downfalls, one can adjust to them quite easily, and personally I don't see the point in spending an exponentially greater amount of money to achieve the same footage as a GH2.

If the GH2 shoots a better quality (sharper) image for less money then there really isn't any reason to get the 5d in my opinion for purely videography. Photography is a completely different story
anyone up for some side booters?
  • 0
Pandysloo
Karma: 204336
20312 Posts
@th1337
icon
Jun 18 2012
10:17:05PM
Quoting .Max. from Jun 18 2012 8:22:13:
it has that micro 4/3's sensor, meaning poor low light performance and increased lens lenghts. It's also plagued with a lower dynamic range.
Haha hyperbole much? The GH2 has its fair share of flaws, but these aren't them. I wouldn't say it's "plagued" with lower dynamic range. If anything it has a smoother knee, which technically means less DR, but also more pleasing highlights. The 5d tries to get every last drop of DR in the image, and as a result the knee is painfully sharp and takes an obnoxious amount of post work to mask. Low light performance is far from "poor," it is just marginally surpassed by the 5d. The difference isn't enough to require any extra lighting.

Really though, there is no reason to pay an extra $2,700 just so you can rely on post-sharpening a low res image with a severely crippled codec.
Surface Skis
www.surfaceskis.com
Causwell
www.causwell.com
  • 0
SourSteezle$
Karma: 282299
7903 Posts
Crazy Fool
icon
Jun 18 2012
11:34:08PM
I agree with most people in this thread so far. It's not the gear it's the person behind the camera. I'm also guilty to getting stuck up in the camera specs.


but, here's one of my favorite edits I always look back at.

Filmed on a vx2100

Splendid Prod. Winter 08 Montage. from Ante Olofsson on Vimeo.

All times are EST (-5); The current time is 5:26AM
<< First < Prev  1   2   3  Next > Last >>
Reply Thread

Tweet
<< Back to thread listing - Previous Page

Related News Articles

Preseason Jib with Corsin Näff and Floh Burkard

Preseason Jib with Corsin Nδff and Floh Burkard

Oct 31st 2011

First snow of the season 11/12! We wen't to the Kaunertal Opening in Austria and had another fantastic day on the Flόela Pass here in Switzerland. Two times perfect snow, perfect weather and lots of fun. check four10skiing.com ! Riders: Corsin Nδff, Floh Burkard Camera: Oli Schuemperlin Panasonic SD707 + Raynox Fisheye and Panasonic GH2 (first time used) Song: Hall & Oates - You Make My Dreams come true

  1. Views: 327
  2. Cmts: 0
  3.  
     
Kaunertal Opening & Preseason Jib with Corsin Näff and Floh Burkard

Kaunertal Opening & Preseason Jib with Corsin Nδff and Floh Burkard

Nov 1st 2011

First snow of the season 11/12! We wen't to the Kaunertal Opening in Austria and had another fantastic day on the Flόela Pass here in Switzerland. Two times perfect snow, perfect weather and lots of fun. check four10skiing.com ! Riders: Corsin Nδff, Floh Burkard Camera: Oli Schuemperlin Panasonic SD707 + Raynox Fisheye and Panasonic GH2 (first time used) Song: Hall & Oates - You Make My Dreams come true

  1. Views: 283
  2. Cmts: 0
  3.  
     

Member Of The Month

icon

Vids Being Watched

Pics Recently Viewed

Latest News

GrindMedia MTNAdvisor Surfer Magazine Surfing Magazine Powder Magazine Snowboarder Magazine Skateboarder Magazine Canoe & Kayak Bike Magazine Standup Paddler Fantasy Surfer GrindTV Surf Ski Motocross Mountain Bike
Copyright © 2013 GrindMedia, LLC. All rights reserved.
(Version 4.0.12)
Rendered in 354.4ms
Home | Advertise | Register | Contact | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Logout