Newschoolers
Newschoolers
Twitter Facebook Fan
   
  1. Home
    • Hot (New!)
    • Latest (New!)
    • Top Rated (New!)
    • Video of the Day
    • Video of the Week
    • Video of the Month
  2. News
    • Features
    • Top Rated (New!)
    • Interviews
    • Events
    • Opinions
    • Industry News
    • Site
    • Product Info
    • Press Releases
  3. Forums
    • Site Discussion
    • Ski Gabber
    • Non-Ski Gabber
    • Media & Arts
    • Regionals
    • Cults
    • Gear Talk
    • Sell/Trade
    • WTB
  4. Pictures
    • Big Mountain
    • Halfpipe
    • Trending
    • Top Rated
    • Latest
    • Jumps
    • Rails
    • Sequences
    • Crash
    • Ski Equipment
  5. Videos
    • Summer
    • Jumps
    • Edits
    • Trending
    • Latest
    • Top Rated
    • Rails
    • Halfpipe
    • Big Mountain
    • Crash
    • Trailers
  6. Community
    • Reviews
    • Events
    • Polls
    • Games
    • Donate!
    • Top Rated Members
    • Cults
  7. NSTV
    • Chug Life
    • 4bi9
    • Traveling Circus
    • Salomon FSTV
    • The Weak
    • Westward
    • COC TV
    • K2 TV
    • 4FRNT TV
    • Inspired TV
  8. Contests
  9. Gear
    • Sell and Trade
    • Gear Talk
    • Reviews
    • Subscribe to Powder
  10. Store
Home News Forums Pictures Videos
Login to NS   |   Lost your password?   |   Register for NS
Lost your password? | Register for NS
Online

members online

The answer to "what bindi - Gear Talk - Forums

preload preload preload
Score: 28
 
 
<< First < Prev  1   2   3   4  .. 8  Next > Last >>
<< Back to thread listing
Subject: The answer to "what binding"
  • 28
DHogg$
Karma : 103432
3511 Posts
Addict
icon
Sep 9 2009
11:08:49PM

Ok, so lately I’ve been noticing a ton of threads asking what bindings would suit them the best and as winter gets closer there’s gonna be a ton more, so I thought it’d be a good idea to have a thread which includes some info to your questions when considering binding choices.

 

Main things to consider when selecting bindings are skier weight, skier ability, binding price, and type of skiing you will be using it for.

 

There’s a lot of bindings around so I’m going to stick to the more popular ones and the ones i’ve had experience with.

 

First off, i’m assuming ability rating of II and III here:

 

10 Din and below bindings: I would recommend a 10 din and under binding for light weight skiers. Even for a skier who is rates themselves as level III ability, if they are under about 120lbs a 10 din might even be a bit much depending on the min setting of the binding. For reference, a din chart estimates a din of 6 (varies slightly depending on a few factors) for a level III skier between 108-125lbs.

 

12 Din Bindings: I would usually recommend a 12 din binding for people between 145lbs and 170/175lbs or so depending on ability. For most people on here, a 12 din binding would be perfect. If you’re a more cautious skier and don’t go fast, take impact ect you should really go down to a 10 din or below binder. Likewise if your aggressive skier you can go up, but be realistic. Don’t get an 18 din binding because if makes you look cool. You won’t be thinking its cool when you’re getting knee surgery and can’t ski half the winter.

 

14/15 Din Bindings: I would recommend a 14/15 din binding generally only for people who are 175lbs+ as well as being a pretty aggressive skier. Basically, if you’re not rating yourself as a level III skier and doing big jumps, cliff hucks, and skiing fast ect, you don’t need it and your better off saving your money.

 

18 + Din bindings: I would only recommend an 18+ din binding for people who are skiing very aggressively and are reasonably heavy. I would normally only recommend something like this for big mtn skiers where you only want your skis to come off in pretty gnarly bails.

 

All of these recommendations give you some “leeway” of the max din of the binding for the particular weight at a level lll skier. You don’t really want to be within 2 dins of the max. So for a 10 Din binding, you don’t really want to be setting it above about 8, likewise if it starts at 5 you don’t really want to se it too far below 7. So yeah..check the din range first.

 

10/11 Din er’s:

-Tyrolia Peak 11 (3-11)

-Rossignol freeski 100

-Look PX 10

-Look P10

-Rossi SAS 100

-head Mojo 11

-Rossi SAS2 110

 

12 Din er’s:

-Marker Griffon

-Look PX 12/Dynastar PX12/ PX12 jib

-Look P12

-Rossignol FKS 120

-Head Mojo/ Tyrolia Peak/ Amplid (all the same)

-Rossignol Axial 120

-Rossignol Axial worldcup 120

-Salomon STH 12

-Rossi SAS 120

-Rossi Axial2 120

-Rossi scratch 120

-Tyrolia freeflex 12

-4frnt deadbolt 12

-Rossi SAS 110

 

14/15/16s :

-Rossignol FKS 155

-Rossignol freeski 140

-Rossignol freeski 150

-Rossignol Axial 140

-Marker Jester

-Head Mojo 15/Tyrolia Peak 15

-Look PX14/PX15

-Salomon STH 16

-Salomon STH 14

-Salomon S914 Lab

-Tyrolia Freeflex 15

-Rossi SAS2 140

-Rossi SAS2 140 Ti

-4frnt deadbolt 14

 

18+ :

-Look P18

-Rossignol FKS 185

-Rossignol freeski 180

-Tyrolia Freeflex 18

-Salomon s920

-Salomon S916 (only goes to 16, but I’d put it up there with p18’s ect)

-rossi Freeski 200

-Rossi freeski2 180

-Rossi SAS2 200

 

Remember, this is a general GUDIELINE ONLY. There are a huge number of factors to consider. I know people who weigh nothing but are hucking off 60 foot cliffs, so they need a high din binding to keep them in. I know just as many people who like to ski on groomers and take it easy so don’t need a high din binding even though they are heavy. Ask yourself how heavy you are, how hard you ski. Where you ski, what you ski, and what ski your putting it on when choosing a binding.

 

 

DISCLAIMER: If you don’t know what you’re doing, do everyone a favour and don’t fuck with your dins. Any adjustments you make are at your own risk. Most shops will check your bindings and set dins for nothing, yes for FREE. So let them do it. Why put yourself in risk you don’t need to.

 

Why are my skis still pre-releasing? There set at like 16 and I weigh 150lbs !!!??????

A lot of people crank up their dins because there skis keep coming off when in reality, there forward pressures set wrong which just increases knee injury as you need so much force to get the ski off in slower crashes. Bottom line: Go to a store to have it checked out.

 

 I know i haven't covered everything or listed all the binding so feel free to ad. We could maybe make it some kind of binding database.

-Dave

----------------------------------------

Dave

  • 3
DHogg$
Karma: 103432
3511 Posts
Addict
icon
Sep 9 2009
11:17:53PM

Oh and binding weights courtesy  to "kpudgar" and "TwigSki"

Look P12/Rossi FKS120............ - 1050 g (2.32 lbs)
Look P18/Rossi FKS185............ - 1235 g (2.72 lbs)

Look PX12 Ti/Rossi Scratch 120... - 1190 g (2.62 lbs)
Look PX14 Ti/Rossi Scratch 140... - 1210 g (2.67 lbs)

Look PX12 Lifter................. - 1260 g (2.78 lbs)
Look PX12 Ti Lifter.............. - 1275 g (2.81 lbs)
Look PX12 Jib.................... - 1280 g (2.82 lbs)
Look PX12 Ti Lifter Wide......... - 1290 g (2.84 lbs)
Look PX12 Ti Jib Wide............ - 1300 g (2.87 lbs)
Look PX14 Ti Lifter.............. - 1300 g (2.87 lbs)

Salomon z12 Ti/Atomic FFG12...... - 846 g (1.87 lbs)
Salomon s912 Ti.................. - 998 g (2.20 lbs)
Atomic FFG14..................... - 1085 g (2.39 lbs)
Salomon s914..................... - 1175 g (2.59 lbs)
Salomon s916..................... - 1460 g (3.22 lbs)

Salomon Sth 12....................- 1015 g (2.24 lbs)
Salomon Sth 14....................- 1025 g (2.26 lbs)
Salomon Sth 14 Driver............ - 1060g (2.34 lbs)
Salomon Sth 16.................- 1161 g (2.56 lbs)

4frnt Deadbolt 412............... - 1200 g (2.65 lbs)
4frnt Deadbolt 614............... - 1225 g (2.70 lbs)

Tyrolia MOJO 15.................. - 1185 g (2.61 lbs)

Marker Griffon.............. - 950 g (2.09 lbs)
Marker Jester................ - 1000 g (2.20 lbs)
----------------------------------------

Dave

  • 0
mattridesskis
Karma: 9985
637 Posts
Ridiculous
icon
Sep 9 2009
11:33:26PM
good guidelines. and the weights are nice too. +K
Crying out to the sky cause he was lonely and scared, but only the devil responded because god wasn't there.

  • 0
mmckechnie
Karma: 36711
1492 Posts
Insane
icon
Sep 9 2009
11:40:53PM
sticky?
  • 0
traylortrash
Karma: 154530
1813 Posts
Insane
icon
Sep 9 2009
11:43:59PM
sticky? also remember that bootsole length can be a factor
Winter Park Rat
  • 0
El_Barto.$
Karma: 32616
6295 Posts
No Life
icon
Sep 9 2009
11:44:57PM
Quoting mmckechnie from Sep 9 2009 11:40:53:
sticky?
should be. enough people make threads asking "which bindings?" so maybe if this is on the front page it will cut down the clutter. +k for sure
-Now remember Kif, the quickest way to a girl's bed is through her parents. Have sex with them and you're in
-Is there some reason a robot made of wax can't take a nap standing up in the middle of a bunch of wax robots? Or does that confuse you?

  • 0
[Nai]
Karma: 28812
1371 Posts
Insane
icon
Sep 10 2009
12:53:03AM
Ok so i weigh 145 and when i get my skis mounted i put level III+ and the highest the shop will put them is at like 6 or 7. i usually turn them up to 10 should i do that or not?
Join the crowbar cult!!!

  • 0
DHogg$
Karma: 103432
3511 Posts
Addict
icon
Sep 10 2009
12:59:21AM
Quoting [Nai] from Sep 10 2009 12:53:03:
Ok so i weigh 145 and when i get my skis mounted i put level III+ and the highest the shop will put them is at like 6 or 7. i usually turn them up to 10 should i do that or not?
Depending on your BSL, the din chart i've got would put you at an 8.5 for type III+ (7 for type III) which i would say should be ok. Try that for a start, if your still coming out and your forward pressures correct ask them to put it up a bit, but i don't think you should need to granted your forward pressure is correct. 8.5 is high for someone whos 145lbs
----------------------------------------

Dave

  • 0
ch.free
Karma: 4864
18 Posts
Newb
icon
Sep 10 2009
7:18:34AM
Some one sticky this, good info. +k
  • 0
BWalmerUltimate Bling!
Karma: 194952
6793 Posts
No Life
icon
Sep 10 2009
9:51:01AM
excellent post, this should be stickied for sure. +k
~WAKIN' UP THE NEIGHBORHOOD TONIGHT!~

~I could carve off a jump so hard I'd come in forward and take off of it switch~

SKI SUNDOWN!

  • 0
MEGAZORDUltimate Bling!
Karma: 8939
4547 Posts
No Life
icon
Sep 10 2009
12:00:36PM
This thread is an enormous liability to both NS and yourself.
  • 0
DHogg$
Karma: 103432
3511 Posts
Addict
icon
Sep 10 2009
4:15:16PM
Quoting DHogg$ from Sep 10 2009 12:59:21:
Depending on your BSL, the din chart i've got would put you at an 8.5 for type III+ (7 for type III) which i would say should be ok. Try that for a start, if your still coming out and your forward pressures correct ask them to put it up a bit, but i don't think you should need to granted your forward pressure is correct. 8.5 is high for someone whos 145lbs
And when i say this i mean take it to a shop, don't do it yourself. You shouldn't need a 10 din.

^ I don't really see it as a liability as i haven't said anything about dins (for that very reason), i've merely suggested some good bindings for different skiers, and if you need high din bindings.
----------------------------------------

Dave

  • 0
Dustin.Ultimate Bling!
Karma: 359972
12340 Posts
Crazy Fool
icon
Sep 10 2009
4:22:54PM
Great thread!  I think it's ridiculous to see every other average skier out there spending hundreds of dollars on 16 DIN bindings when a 12 would be plenty sufficient.  Also think it's funny when people make such a big deal on the weight of the bindings.  A third of a pound is BABY SHIT.  If you can notice that, then you must be able to feel a bee fart too.  Don't kid yourself.
I love skiing.

  • 0
Boax$
Karma: 200889
5418 Posts
No Life
icon
Sep 10 2009
5:47:26PM
[i]"You don’t really want to be within 2 dins of the max"[/i]

Myth.
www.boax.co.uk - Boax Headwear, shipping worldwide
  • 0
SkierX$
Karma: 246223
16074 Posts
Post Whore
icon
Sep 10 2009
7:22:38PM
Good thread, and I don't see it as a liability in any way personally. He is not setting the DINs himself, he is merely explaining things a bit and giving suggestions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-Steve Clark
~~Phunkin Phatt Phreerider~~
~572nd Member of Newschoolers.com

'if you were doing one of them doggystyle and she flexed her butt cheeks, your dick would get ripped off.'
~Alpentalik on the subject of Serena Williams

"Eco suck my dick is what i call it, when i have to globally warm my hands in my asshole i'm not a fan of that green shit at all"
~Bangor
  • 0
SkierX$
Karma: 246223
16074 Posts
Post Whore
icon
Sep 10 2009
7:24:32PM
Quoting Boax$ from Sep 10 2009 5:47:26:

Myth.
It is a pretty common thing that I've always believed to be true as well. Do you have any info that refutes this?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-Steve Clark
~~Phunkin Phatt Phreerider~~
~572nd Member of Newschoolers.com

'if you were doing one of them doggystyle and she flexed her butt cheeks, your dick would get ripped off.'
~Alpentalik on the subject of Serena Williams

"Eco suck my dick is what i call it, when i have to globally warm my hands in my asshole i'm not a fan of that green shit at all"
~Bangor
  • 0
.peter
Karma: 22922
1235 Posts
Insane
icon
Sep 10 2009
7:39:10PM
2 things
1st
it's sometimes good to have a binding that goes up higher than you need. (You can always turn them down) And having a ski come off at the wrong time is no fun.
2nd
If you're an aggressive skier buy a higher din binding. There really should be a level IV after level III because the people who used too be "experts" have much different demands for their bindings than people do now. (just think about what your dad needs compared to you. Chances are, he's not hitting rails or doing taps or spinning off jumps.)

Oh and just fyi racers have bindings that go up to at least 21.

  • 0
MEGAZORDUltimate Bling!
Karma: 8939
4547 Posts
No Life
icon
Sep 10 2009
7:39:44PM
Quoting SkierX$ from Sep 10 2009 7:24:32:
It is a pretty common thing that I've always believed to be true as well. Do you have any info that refutes this?
Yes.  Every tech manual from any company says so.  I dont really agree with it myself, i wouldnt get that close to the end with my stuff.  It really was for the older stuff, when the springs werent as consistent under maximum load.  Stuff now adays is 'supposed' to be fine, but ive tested certain things and they dont always release consistently and the max DIN or close to it.
  • 0
MEGAZORDUltimate Bling!
Karma: 8939
4547 Posts
No Life
icon
Sep 10 2009
7:41:42PM
Quoting .peter from Sep 10 2009 7:39:10:
2 things1st it's sometimes good to have a binding that goes up higher than you need. (You can always turn them down) And having a ski come off at the wrong time is no fun.2ndIf you're an aggressive skier buy a higher din binding. There really should be a level IV after level III because the people who used too be "experts" have much different demands for their bindings than people do now. (just think about what your dad needs compared to you. Chances are, he's not hitting rails or doing taps or spinning off jumps.)Oh and just fyi racers have bindings that go up to at least 21.
There is a level 4, its called III+.  Its the same adjustment range and one step about III, why they dont call it IV is beyond me.
  • 0
DHogg$
Karma: 103432
3511 Posts
Addict
icon
Sep 10 2009
8:01:00PM
Quoting .peter from Sep 10 2009 7:39:10:
2 things1st it's sometimes good to have a binding that goes up higher than you need. (You can always turn them down) And having a ski come off at the wrong time is no fun.2ndIf you're an aggressive skier buy a higher din binding. There really should be a level IV after level III because the people who used too be "experts" have much different demands for their bindings than people do now. (just think about what your dad needs compared to you. Chances are, he's not hitting rails or doing taps or spinning off jumps.)Oh and just fyi racers have bindings that go up to at least 21.
Yeah well as i said in the OP, im assuming level II and III here. Anyone in III+ should go higher. My bands should put you somewhere in the middle of the din range. Quite a few bindings above 12 dins start pretty high so thats why i suggested getting a lower din one where you will be in the middle as opposed to on each end.
----------------------------------------

Dave

  • 0
MEGAZORDUltimate Bling!
Karma: 8939
4547 Posts
No Life
icon
Sep 10 2009
8:03:07PM
Quoting .peter from Sep 10 2009 7:39:10:
2 things1st it's sometimes good to have a binding that goes up higher than you need. (You can always turn them down) And having a ski come off at the wrong time is no fun.2ndIf you're an aggressive skier buy a higher din binding. There really should be a level IV after level III because the people who used too be "experts" have much different demands for their bindings than people do now. (just think about what your dad needs compared to you. Chances are, he's not hitting rails or doing taps or spinning off jumps.)Oh and just fyi racers have bindings that go up to at least 21.
The only binding that goes past 20 was the marker m30.0.  They dont make it anymore because its outrageous.  Nowadays 18-20 would be the max, even for a race binding.
  • 0
Boax$
Karma: 200889
5418 Posts
No Life
icon
Sep 11 2009
4:57:00AM
Quoting SkierX$ from Sep 10 2009 7:24:32:
It is a pretty common thing that I've always believed to be true as well. Do you have any info that refutes this?
Testing bindings at or past the upper limit, using bindings at the upper limit.

At the ends of the scale the DIN indicator might be less accurate, that's all. So a 12 DIN set at 12 might actually release like 11.5 or 12.5. Your required DIN isn't an exact science anyway; if you're setting them that high then you're not reading from a chart, you're going by retention/release as you use them.
www.boax.co.uk - Boax Headwear, shipping worldwide
  • 0
SkierX$
Karma: 246223
16074 Posts
Post Whore
icon
Sep 11 2009
8:43:05AM
Quoting Boax$ from Sep 11 2009 4:57:00:
Testing bindings at or past the upper limit, using bindings at the upper limit.

At the ends of the scale the DIN indicator might be less accurate, that's all. So a 12 DIN set at 12 might actually release like 11.5 or 12.5. Your required DIN isn't an exact science anyway; if you're setting them that high then you're not reading from a chart, you're going by retention/release as you use them.
Gotcha. Good to know. Thanks for posting up the evidence.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-Steve Clark
~~Phunkin Phatt Phreerider~~
~572nd Member of Newschoolers.com

'if you were doing one of them doggystyle and she flexed her butt cheeks, your dick would get ripped off.'
~Alpentalik on the subject of Serena Williams

"Eco suck my dick is what i call it, when i have to globally warm my hands in my asshole i'm not a fan of that green shit at all"
~Bangor
  • 0
summersoverUltimate Bling!
Karma: 263442
5802 Posts
No Life
icon
Sep 11 2009
10:20:05AM
great thread
shame we can't do a "what ski" thread haha
-Steve

There's no reason that, you know, like nine and ten year old kids shouldn't be growin' beards. Its all in your mindset, I don't know what their problem is, personally. -Josh Bibby

Placing your own well-being in the hands of Non-Ski Gabber is way more fun -SkierX

  • 0
no_steezeUltimate Bling!
Karma: 306227
23237 Posts
@th1337
icon
Sep 11 2009
2:41:23PM
good guide

here's a picture on how to adjust forward pressure on turntables

it's a very loose indicator on turntables but try to get it as close as possible. by turning the wormscrews on either side of the dildo heelpiece you want to get it so that when you click the boot in, the back of the white tab (part that faces tail of the ski) lines up with the 2 black notches on the baseplate assembly (circled)

this picture shows what direction the tab needs to go so that it will be correctly adjusted

KEEP IN MIND when you adjust with the boot in, take it out and then click it in again to get the real setting, it will often change

Click for larger image

as he said, sometimes your binding will release with din at 30 if the forward pressure is set wrong, that's the #1 concern, if you don't know how to do it, take it to the shop

My terrible photos
http://www.flickr.com/photos/38339411@N07/

"I've been blessed with many things in this life, an arm like a damn rocket, the cock of a Burmese python, and the mind of a fucking scientist" -KP!

RIP Shane, you will be missed

  • 0
no_steezeUltimate Bling!
Karma: 306227
23237 Posts
@th1337
icon
Sep 11 2009
8:42:12PM
also, hopefully people will read this when asking about where to mount:

FIRST OFF- almost every single ski has a line on it that was drawn by the designers of that ski. the point is called recommended. there is a reason they put that on the ski...meaning that line is where the manufacturer feels the ski rides best and it's where they suggest you put your bindings. companies are starting to put 2 lines sometimes, one further back at a more traditional mount and one at a more progressive mount, this mainly occurs on park skis or those goofy curved up tip skis that kids ride these days....

now people often stray from that which is perfectly understandable and often the better move. there are way too many threads all asking the same thing with the same info, and the answers should normally be the same

first off, clarification:
true center- when you simply measure the ski and cut it directly in half, that's all there is to it
core center- the point in a ski where the core is the thickest, so if you were to measure the sidewall height it would be the thickest point
recommended- explained above
*all suggested movements must be specified if they're relative to true center or recommended, but movements are always in centimeters*

Powder: if said ski is for 100% pow, going forwards the whole time, you're gonna want to mount at company recommended for a pow ski, which will be around -7ish from true center. this gives the best float by having more tip than there is tail

Powder jibbing: if you like buttering off pillows and playing around in pow, you might want to consider mounting at something like -3 from true center, or, if you're riding switch a lot, go directly at center. this will make them more fun going switch and in the air but they will float much worse. it's better to do this with skis like ep's or hellbents that have a ton of rocker to compensate for the more modern mount

All mtn: groomer riding, some trees, some bumps, no park, i'd suggest recommended as well for an all mtn ski

50/50: mix between park and all mtn, general consensus is -2.5cm from true center. this puts you far enough in the center for park and switch riding and also far enough back to have them perform decently on groomers and all mtn riding

Park: most people ride at true center, -1 from true, or sometimes even +1. a symmetrical ski will ride great at center but some skis are a bit funky when you mount them dead center, hence why some people go a bit forward and some a bit back

Touring: I would strongly recommend not mounting a ski with touring bindings close to center. dukes push you back a bit when you put them into touring mode so you can get away with a few cm's above recommended if you feel the need

now a there're tons of categories that fall in between those, so use them as guidelines

in the same way that there is not one ski to do it all perfectly, there isn't one mounting position that works perfectly for absolutely everything, so we make compromises. try to think about what would best suit what you need to use it for

the further back you go towards recommended, the better they will be in pow and on groomers but the worse in park and in the air and vice versa...there's a reason race skis aren't mounted at true center...

some skis have special exceptions, for instance i've heard bad things about JJ's being mounted in front of or behind recommended. with such a short sidecut it really throws off the dims if you move around the bindings. although, some people who just use them for jibbing have put them further up, so do your homework and read up before you make new threads. also symmetrical skis are meant to be mounted at true center

hope that helped a little, please fill in places where i fucked up
My terrible photos
http://www.flickr.com/photos/38339411@N07/

"I've been blessed with many things in this life, an arm like a damn rocket, the cock of a Burmese python, and the mind of a fucking scientist" -KP!

RIP Shane, you will be missed

  • 0
MEGAZORDUltimate Bling!
Karma: 8939
4547 Posts
No Life
icon
Sep 11 2009
10:10:53PM
The problems with the JJs for years was the fact that 90% of the lines on the skis were marked incorrectly or differed from left to right ski.  I know mine were off by quite a bit and were 1cm different between skis.
  • 0
no_steezeUltimate Bling!
Karma: 306227
23237 Posts
@th1337
icon
Sep 11 2009
10:27:13PM
Quoting MEGAZORDUltimate Bling! from Sep 11 2009 10:10:53:
The problems with the JJs for years was the fact that 90% of the lines on the skis were marked incorrectly or differed from left to right ski.  I know mine were off by quite a bit and were 1cm different between skis.
im talking about the 09 JJ's, the lines are at -5 from true center

but he brings up a good point, it's always good to find true center or find a measurement from the tail just to make sure the lines are right

i had a pair of bluehouses and the lines were 5cm's apart between the 2 skis

also always draw a nice sharpie line on your skis to avoid confusion on mounting point. bottom line, if the tech mounts your skis in the wrong place and you didn't draw the line, it's YOUR FAULT
My terrible photos
http://www.flickr.com/photos/38339411@N07/

"I've been blessed with many things in this life, an arm like a damn rocket, the cock of a Burmese python, and the mind of a fucking scientist" -KP!

RIP Shane, you will be missed

  • 0
Tait.
Karma: 20685
52 Posts
Wannabe
icon
Sep 13 2009
3:14:28PM
marker jesters are the best binding iv ever skied! every time i pop  um on they rock my socks. also for a din of 16 they are pretty light even in comparison to the smaller griffon.
  • -1
Pipe_Munky$
Karma: 89982
10259 Posts
Crazy Fool
icon
Sep 15 2009
1:02:26AM

this thread is a bad idea period. pretty much in the same class as the "what should i set my din at?" questions.

take it down

ATTENTION/WARNING
The preceding statements are the opinions of Pipe Munky himself and in no way reflect the opinions or beliefs of his employers or Newschoolers.com thus releasing them from any liability.

Thank you.

  • 0
ch.free
Karma: 4864
18 Posts
Newb
icon
Sep 15 2009
1:49:23AM
how is it different to someone making a thread and asking what binding to get?
  • 0
Silence$$
Karma: 116681
16205 Posts
Post Whore
icon
Sep 17 2009
8:50:36AM
Good info, but everyone should know that binding choice isn't an exact science so take everything here with a grain of salt..
If you ACTUALLY need something over a 12 DIN then you shouldn't even need this thread as a reference.

-------------------------------------
Kind Regards,
Simon.


-=-=ON3P=-=-

  • 0
MEGAZORDUltimate Bling!
Karma: 8939
4547 Posts
No Life
icon
Sep 17 2009
1:11:48PM
Quoting Silence$$ from Sep 17 2009 8:50:36:
Good info, but everyone should know that binding choice isn't an exact science so take everything here with a grain of salt..
If you ACTUALLY need something over a 12 DIN then you shouldn't even need this thread as a reference.

Exactly. 
  • 0
Ralf
Karma: 34766
960 Posts
Insane
icon
Sep 17 2009
1:38:42PM

i have look p18.

it is said that if you buy a smaller boot you can adjust them anywhere between 1cm.

is that true and if so how do you do that?

  • 0
Boax$
Karma: 200889
5418 Posts
No Life
icon
Sep 17 2009
2:08:35PM
Quoting Ralf from Sep 17 2009 1:38:42:
i have look p18.
it is said that if you buy a smaller boot you can adjust them anywhere between 1cm.
is that true and if so how do you do that?
1cm total adjustment range. So 5mm bigger or smaller. If you change your boot's shell size you need to remount.
www.boax.co.uk - Boax Headwear, shipping worldwide
  • 0
jamodeo
Karma: 78840
3028 Posts
Addict
icon
Sep 20 2009
9:20:25PM
STH 14 best bindings ive ever had they lock u down and arnt to heavy
  • 0
TastyCorn
Karma: 2791
83 Posts
Wannabe
icon
Sep 22 2009
9:03:46PM
Is there any difference in a 3-12 din range binding set to 8, and a 4-14 din range binding set to 8?
  • 0
frontline31
Karma: 3450
158 Posts
Pro
icon
Sep 23 2009
1:54:55PM

This is all great info, but what if you want to know which binding would be best suitable for your specific ski?

  • 0
ch.free
Karma: 4864
18 Posts
Newb
icon
Sep 23 2009
11:36:36PM
not really relevant ^ a good bindings is good on any ski. hence why some many people use race bindings on 130mm waisted skis
  • 0
most_mint
Karma: 19273
488 Posts
Ridiculous
icon
Sep 27 2009
5:00:21PM

i just bought a pair of marker 11.0 free bindings and then read all the horror stories on here about these bindings releasing early or even when u dont fall and im wondering if there is a way i can keep them from doing this when i get them mounted besides cranking up the din because i ski 50/50 park/ allmountain and i like my knees. thanks

  • 0
frontline31
Karma: 3450
158 Posts
Pro
icon
Sep 27 2009
5:15:03PM
Quoting ch.free from Sep 23 2009 11:36:36:
not really relevant ^ a good bindings is good on any ski. hence why some many people use race bindings on 130mm waisted skis
Thanks.
  • 0
Evan.Frazee$
Karma: 82706
2303 Posts
Addict
icon
Sep 28 2009
1:40:18AM
Im 5'10 190lbs a type 3 skier and i need new bindings. But will i be ok on a 12 din or do i need to bump up?

Thanks
dude thats North Korea

the one with the Nuke and fat ass dictator

we are south korea

with Samsung and fast internet
_Justin2002x

Flawlessapparel.com
  • 0
oskar.lipa
Karma: 5010
116 Posts
Pro
icon
Sep 30 2009
8:31:08PM
Does anybody know the real reason to why they stopped producing the fks pivot heel bindings?
  • 0
DHogg$
Karma: 103432
3511 Posts
Addict
icon
Sep 30 2009
8:47:55PM
Quoting oskar.lipa from Sep 30 2009 8:31:08:
Does anybody know the real reason to why they stopped producing the fks pivot heel bindings?
no one really knows. I'm guessing cost. The new ones look like they would be cheaper to make as all parts interchangeable ect.

Coming back in limited #'s this year though
----------------------------------------
Dave
NEW ZEALAND

  • 0
Luc.$
Karma: 134592
7755 Posts
Crazy Fool
icon
Oct 1 2009
12:09:22PM
Quoting Silence$$ from Sep 17 2009 8:50:36:
Good info, but everyone should know that binding choice isn't an exact science so take everything here with a grain of salt..
If you ACTUALLY need something over a 12 DIN then you shouldn't even need this thread as a reference.

ya thats a good point actually.

i dont think this thread is a major problem other than it making people feel like they know what they need/are talking about.

working on your own bindings isnt a bad idea. IF (and this is a HUGE if) you are competent and know what you are doing. you can get certified but these days the tests are a joke at best. the best thing to do is take it into a competent shop that knows their shit and get them to do all the dirty work for ya.


and embraced thats crazy that the majority is all off. good to know.
---------------------------------
-LUCIFER
...
185 volkl karmas on second mount (06/07) for sale/trade, 7.5/10 condish...pm me

meow.

  • 0
Tom_Akt
Karma: 16672
65 Posts
Wannabe
icon
Oct 5 2009
7:32:26PM
look px12 jib is dope and its not that expensive at all. around 160$
  • 0
antwone
Karma: 16083
1367 Posts
Insane
icon
Oct 6 2009
4:19:21PM
Quoting MEGAZORDUltimate Bling! from Sep 10 2009 8:03:07:
The only binding that goes past 20 was the marker m30.0.  They dont make it anymore because its outrageous.  Nowadays 18-20 would be the max, even for a race binding.
noob fks made 21s
yeye
  • 0
ArnieP
Karma: 2817
967 Posts
Insane
icon
Oct 6 2009
4:26:37PM
Quoting antwone from Oct 6 2009 4:19:21:
noob fks made 21s
Prove it bitch.
  • 0
no_steezeUltimate Bling!
Karma: 306227
23237 Posts
@th1337
icon
Oct 6 2009
6:11:56PM
Quoting antwone from Oct 6 2009 4:19:21:
noob fks made 21s
fks is the greatest company, i ride their 4 din demo model and i've only released like 700 times
My terrible photos
http://www.flickr.com/photos/38339411@N07/

OMG3P

RIP Shane, you will be missed

  • 0
Rachy
Karma: 91496
3386 Posts
Addict
icon
Oct 24 2009
12:18:35PM
Quoting DHogg$ from Sep 30 2009 8:47:55:
no one really knows. I'm guessing cost. The new ones look like they would be cheaper to make as all parts interchangeable ect.

Coming back in limited #'s this year though
I heard rossi quit when too many people were early ejecting. That may have been a rumor though since a lot of people really liked the pivot. The ones I had should have been recalled. A lot of the times when I was stepping in, it would turn slightly with out me realizing it and it would bend the plastic down. I Had to get them repaired 3 times over the course of a season. So annoying.

I had someone offer to buy them off me though even after being 5 seasons old after they quit making them.
  • 0
Hooper
Karma: 12415
341 Posts
Loner
icon
Oct 24 2009
8:21:41PM
sweet guide!
Supposedly the average male thinks about sex every 7 seconds. I think about skiing every 2.

All times are EST (-5); The current time is 11:50PM
<< First < Prev  1   2   3   4  .. 8  Next > Last >>
Reply Thread

Tweet
<< Back to thread listing - Previous Page

Related News Articles

NEW AMBUSH TEAM ENTRY: Tanja Gmür

NEW AMBUSH TEAM ENTRY: Tanja Gmür

Sep 27th 2009

Name: Tanja Gmür Born: 12.04.1990 Home Town: Altendorf Home Mountain: Laax, Hoch-Ybrig Riding since: started with 2 years Shred Set up:  Allure, Ski center What would be the first question you wouldn’t have an answer for? I’ve got a lot of questions I don’t have an answer for but I’m sure nobody else has an answer either… What in your eyes made [...][IMG]http://media.nscdn.com/uploads/member/journal_entries/3399-extcpy/0tanja_gmuer.jpg[/IMG]

  1. Views: 672
  2. Cmts: 1
  3.  
     
The Dynafit Beast 16 Binding is Coming For You!

The Dynafit Beast 16 Binding is Coming For You!

Jan 11th 2013

The rumors are true. Dynafit is releasing their latest binding for 2013/2014. Meet the new Dynafit Beast 16 Binding.

  1. Views: 2126
  2. Cmts: 1
  3.  
     
Stuff and things.

Stuff and things.

Apr 11th 2009

“Where can i find out about lenses?”  Answer -  http://www.the-digital-picture.com This website only deals with Canon equipment but if you have a question about a particular lens, this site will hold the answer of you dig for it.  It also had comparisons between all the lenses.  I’m afraid I know absolutely nothing about Nikon cameras [...]

  1. Views: 1025
  2. Cmts: 1
  3.  
     
MFD AllTime Touring Binding: Blister Gear Super Review

MFD AllTime Touring Binding: Blister Gear Super Review

Nov 30th 2011

This is one amazing review from Blistergearreview.com on the MFD Alltime Touring Binding. This binding is already changing the game when it comes to backcountry and touring setups. Stoked to get some awesome info on how they are performing in real-life situations!

  1. Views: 1145
  2. Cmts: 0
  3.  
     

Member Of The Month

icon

Vids Being Watched

Pics Recently Viewed

Latest News

GrindMedia MTNAdvisor Surfer Magazine Surfing Magazine Powder Magazine Snowboarder Magazine Skateboarder Magazine Canoe & Kayak Bike Magazine Standup Paddler Fantasy Surfer GrindTV Surf Ski Motocross Mountain Bike
Copyright © 2013 GrindMedia, LLC. All rights reserved.
(Version 4.0.12)
Rendered in 351.4ms
Home | Advertise | Register | Contact | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Logout