Canon made a low level DSLR with 1080p60 $1199... wooooww
http://www.canonrumors.com/canon-eos-80d-specifications/
Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
ben_collinsStill no where near the GH3 for price
ben_collinsStill no where near the GH3 for price
RealistStill isn't 1080p
ski.the.eastis this confirmed or are you guessing?
but seriously I'd be way more surprised if it is true 1080p, it's embarrassing that they all shoot ~900p and I bet this'll be the same shit
ski.the.eastit's embarrassing that they all shoot ~900p
SKI.INGLolz this site still has the Canon vendetta going. I love it. Watch countless behind the scenes videos and so many professionals actually in the industry using Canons, but not good old NS. Not good enough. Much mainstream. Not Arc'teryx.
SKI.INGLolz this site still has the Canon vendetta going. I love it. Watch countless behind the scenes videos and so many professionals actually in the industry using Canons, but not good old NS. Not good enough. Much mainstream. Not Arc'teryx.
lIllIFor every negative comment about Canon there are a dozen threads asking which Canon to get.
But now that you mention it, do you have any recent examples of Canon DSLRs being used for professional video? I'm genuinely curious, since I stopped following video tech sometime around the GH3's release.
MNSkiersWhy would I get that instead of adding $100-$300 for a GH4 that shoots 4k..?
HarkStudiosIt comes down to preference. DSLRs and M4/3 and Mirrorless cameras all have their own pros and cons.
The GH4 shoots 4k, but is also tiny. Someone with bigger hands, or someone who likes a larger style body should go DSLR rather than M4/3 because of the size difference. (in my opinion)
Also, my understanding is that a vast majority of people use a speedbooster with canon glass on a M4/3, so instead of dropping the extra dollo, just buying a camera with the EF mount may make more sense...