Welcome to our new beta design! Click here to go back to the old Newschoolers.
Swandog7If you are riding the park especially in MN go with the 92. If you ride like 50/50 park to all mountain which i assume you don't id go for the 102s. IMO the 92 will fit the bill better, but if you really wanted to go for a 102 you could, but not recommended
parkskier5I'm friends with someone who rides Line Blend's (100 under foot) and he likes them a lot. We live in the midwest and he primarily uses them for park. So yeah, I think 102's would be perfectly do-able for park and would be killer on trips out west.
GaperGodwhere do you guys ski i ski at hyland MN
GaperGodI need new skis and am currently riding 85 mm underfoot. I am looking at the k2 shreditor 92 and 102 and was wondering if you can still ski park pretty easily on the 102 because I want a wider ski for when im not lapping the park and when i go out west. My main question is are the 102s fine in the park?
pattyeiksThe 102s are a burlier ski because they are wider underfoot but if you want that extra width for stability and want a ski that can go everywhere on the mountains your skiing out west, but you should consider how many days you get out west and how many you get at Hyland and choose a ski that fits whichever type of skiing you'll be doing more