Welcome to our new beta design! Click here to go back to the old Newschoolers.
OregonDeadI considered all of those and ended up on YLEs. Skis like these feel like they ski short to me because of the twin tip rocker and forward mounting point.
ReedSkis~Anyone have any input on whether the 188 magnum opus would be too big?
jfprocker 2 122
ZurgHave you thought of the icelantic Da'nollies? They aren't super fat but they have all you want
Blake.PYou're joking right? He's looking at a bunch of ~120mm underfoot pow skis and you recommended a 95 underfoot symmetrical park ski
grannmcrandyYeah I think that would be a bit too long. For 5'8", I wouldn't go any longer than like 183 or so.
jcaim 5'8" and wouldnt go shorter than about 185.. I love my 191 caylors, very surfy due to the rocker profile and still pretty good all round due to the stiff flex pattern. I havent been on the 122 jeffreys but i believe that theyre quite similar.
ZurgTbh I didn't even read his post. I just read the tittle "Help me pick a surfy fat jib ski" by that I thought he was talking about a wider park ski. My bad tho.
shin-bangYou evil emperor zurg ..not even reading the op
buzzlightyearbuzzlightyear to the rescue!!! I will defeat you zurg! to infinity and beyond!!
ReedSkis~Are they good in the trees? Is spinning difficult?
jcaHow do you like the length of your Night Trains?
jcain tight trees.
joesdapoesThe rocker2 122 is a fenomenal pow ski, but not much more then that. You wont be able to carve on hardpack at all