lcoopmanI have a sony a65 which is a awesome camera.films 1080 at 60. Really high quality stills, in body stablization. Canon are nice, just depends on which one fits you
NMMediaI too love my a65, but cannon and nikon are for sure better for stills than the sony. Sony kicks ass in the video department though
lcoopmanYeah you can get a used sony A77 body on ebay for around $400, but lenses add up.
Aidin954I went canon because that's what I always used for photos, another reason why, lenses. Fucking red rings man.
cdipWho cares about the ring lol.
cdipSony isnt really in my budget. I already bought a nikon lens just dont know what body to get. Looking at the d5500
dan_swagnerI use all canon L series with my sony a7s. Canon bodies suck for video if you get anything below a c100
RockNRollNghtClbthe gh3 for video is fucking unbelievable considering the price, the image quality is just unreal. Anybody thats buying a camera for video with enough money for a t5i and that's not primarily shooting in low light should get the gh3. There should be a fucking sticky thread in here saying that
lIllIIn my experience the GH2 slays the 7D in lowlight. The GH2 has a Sony like clean quality to it even when pushed. Shoot the 7D above 400 ISO and you get thick rainbow noise.
DingoSeanEven in low light, the GH3 is still pretty good... certainly no worse than any of the Canon 18 megapixel apsc sensor cams as far as I can tell (probably not even much worse than the 20mp cams like the 70D and 7D2)