Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Atomic Infamous 2015

profile picture
Seanlynch11
Posts: 40 - Karma: 365
How are these skis? Are they light but still durable for jumps? I'm a jump and slopestlye skier so I don't want these skis if they are like line after bang time of skis.
Nov 26 2014 2:41PM
3 1
profile picture
Willows
Posts: 442 - Karma: 2,624
light, soft in the tip and tail, stiff under foot, no delam', price point ski with relatively good durability. They are nowhere near the afterbangs... Get the 13/14 as the only thing they changed from last season is the topsheet - so you will get the same ski cheaper and in my opinion better looking :)
Nov 26 2014 3:08PM
2 0
profile picture
Seanlynch11
Posts: 40 - Karma: 365
What size Rossignol FKS 140 Ski Bindings 2015 would go with 161 cm. Atomics?
Nov 26 2014 5:35PM
0 0
profile picture
Willows
Posts: 442 - Karma: 2,624
I'm not sure..

What is your weight and height? the 140 fks for a 161 ski might be a bit overkill if you are not that big of a guy :)
Nov 27 2014 4:31AM
0 0
profile picture
HuckNorris44
Posts: 1025 - Karma: 2,392
Go with the 95's. The Infamous are 86 under waist. I have a pair of the 95's on some AR7's which have the same waist width.
Nov 27 2014 3:37PM
0 0
profile picture
Seanlynch11
Posts: 40 - Karma: 365
I'm only 5'8 135 lbs
Nov 28 2014 10:13AM
0 0
profile picture
Willows
Posts: 442 - Karma: 2,624
Then that binding is maybe a bit to burly for you as it does probably not have the DIN-range you're looking for
Nov 30 2014 8:13AM
0 0
profile picture
dadunda
Posts: 447 - Karma: 219
Seanlynch11I'm only 5'8 135 lbs


In addition to the above, I would highly consider going for the 171 option. I'm about your size and have the 171s and really enjoy the extra length (old skis were 159s). Way more stable.
Nov 30 2014 2:58PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)