Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

The Full Tilt Conspiracy Theory

profile picture
PearTree-Prod
Posts: 116 - Karma: 882
As the years go on the gear that we buy is starting to look worse and worse. With Full Tilt you can observe that they are slowly making the less expensive boots look worse so less people buy them and the boots that cost more such as the tammy wamstick pro model and seth morrisons look better therefore people have to spend more money on their boots.

Thoughts?
POLL
Edit Poll
Votes:

Take care when editing a poll; Options should be similar to maintain vote integrity.

More options will be added automatically as you type. You must supply a question and at least two options. No HTML is allowed.

Aug 31 2014 4:09PM
75 15
profile picture
Negromancer
Posts: 1014 - Karma: 1,499
Only retards buy boots based on looks.
Aug 31 2014 5:29PM
28 1
profile picture
PearTree-Prod
Posts: 116 - Karma: 882
NegromancerOnly retards buy boots based on looks.


True however it is still part of the consideration whenever you buy anything because nobody wants to buy something that looks like shit
Aug 31 2014 5:33PM
10 4
profile picture
japanada
Posts: 13784 - Karma: 1,957
Eric_PartridgeTrue however it is still part of the consideration whenever you buy anything because nobody wants to buy something that looks like shit


Lies. I rode baby powder blue lange W/C 130s for years. Ugly as sin, but they fit like a glove. WHo cares, theyre boots that get covered in snow and by you snow pants. And you def too young to be worrying about the Apre scene...
Aug 31 2014 5:52PM
6 0
profile picture
beauchamp
Posts: 662 - Karma: 1,191
Eric_PartridgeAs the years go on the gear that we buy is starting to look worse and worse. With Full Tilt you can observe that they are slowly making the less expensive boots look worse so less people buy them and the boots that cost more such as the tammy wamstick pro model and seth morrisons look better therefore people have to spend more money on their boots.

Thoughts?


Are you fucking kidding me? This year's dropkick are insane! Classic, yet stylish look. I have the 2013 booter and they weren't the steeziest of their line but i still picked 'em because guess what, i'm 16 and i paid my whole kit myself. Like every other company, FT makes cheaper products for people (like me) who don't have a big budget. However, they don't make the material a whole lot cheaper. I skied every wednesday and weekends plus christmas break plus spring break and they are almost like new. they only have cosmetic damage. but as said above, people don't buy ski boots regarding the look.

Aug 31 2014 9:13PM
4 1
profile picture
Bum.Life
Posts: 507 - Karma: 2,608
Companies aren't going to spend a shit load of money to make stuff that purposely looks bad so that people won't buy it. That makes no sense at all. This thread is balls
Aug 31 2014 11:32PM
6 1
profile picture
MontanaMuggin
Posts: 444 - Karma: 1,642
Don't know what your talking about, Iove this years and last years drop kicks!
Sep 1 2014 12:09PM
0 0
profile picture
Donketts
Posts: 261 - Karma: 173
who cares how they look... some full tilts are ugly in the passed but they didn't do it on purpose
Sep 1 2014 12:58PM
1 0
profile picture
Brocka_Flocka
Posts: 1213 - Karma: 8,768
Still a shitty boot
Sep 1 2014 4:50PM
3 0
profile picture
smooter
Posts: 1121 - Karma: 1,365
i bought my full tilts because they fit my narrow feet perfectly
Sep 1 2014 11:18PM
0 0
profile picture
Basil91
Posts: 123 - Karma: 593
If you buy your boots based on looks, I feel bad for you son.
Sep 2 2014 3:23PM
1 0
profile picture
ZachAndCheese
Posts: 816 - Karma: 5,116
Every major company does this, what looks better a Lamborghini or a VW Jetta???
Sep 2 2014 3:25PM
1 0
profile picture
SimplyClean
Posts: 556 - Karma: 1,752
beauchampAre you fucking kidding me? This year's dropkick are insane! Classic, yet stylish look. I have the 2013 booter and they weren't the steeziest of their line but i still picked 'em because guess what, i'm 16 and i paid my whole kit myself. Like every other company, FT makes cheaper products for people (like me) who don't have a big budget. However, they don't make the material a whole lot cheaper. I skied every wednesday and weekends plus christmas break plus spring break and they are almost like new. they only have cosmetic damage. but as said above, people don't buy ski boots regarding the look.



Uh oh...16 year old buying his own full tilts and preaching us on boots.
Sep 2 2014 6:03PM
1 0
profile picture
beauchamp
Posts: 662 - Karma: 1,191
SimplyCleanUh oh...16 year old buying his own full tilts and preaching us on boots.


what's the problem? was i wrong with something i said? i wasn't preaching, i was giv
Sep 3 2014 6:35AM
0 0
profile picture
beauchamp
Posts: 662 - Karma: 1,191
beauchampwhat's the problem? was i wrong with something i said? i wasn't preaching, i was giv


*fuck*
i was giving my 2 cents on the topic that's all.
Sep 3 2014 6:38AM
0 0
profile picture
onenerdykid
Posts: 6638 - Karma: 10,532
Bum.LifeCompanies aren't going to spend a shit load of money to make stuff that purposely looks bad so that people won't buy it. That makes no sense at all. This thread is balls


A golden rule of product development is that the top model (which is at the same time the most expensive) should look the best. That is the "vector model" and it's the image piece that should drive the brand. This is how the car, bike, boat, shoe, ski boot industry etc all operate.

However, this does not mean that a company should make the lower end products look shitty on purpose (after all they need to sell those too). It just means that the top should look the best. This is tricky thing to achieve because trying to purposefully make a lower end product look less attractive while not causing it to look bad is not an easy thing to do. Ultimately, whether or not a company actually achieves this is rather subjective but I can guarantee you that no brand is purposefully trying to make their low end product look bad.
Sep 3 2014 7:35AM
4 0
profile picture
teamdummy
Posts: 1187 - Karma: 2,595
The only full tilt s that really turned me off were last year's T Walls. The graffiti ones. Yuckaroo! Cant say I loved his "Timberlands" model either. I think this year's are on point though.
Sep 4 2014 8:20AM
0 0
profile picture
Donketts
Posts: 261 - Karma: 173
SimplyCleanUh oh...16 year old buying his own full tilts and preaching us on boots.


im 12 i bought my whole kit so how do you feel. I bought my skis,pants,jackets,goggles,helmets,poles.face mask,boots,bindings. Everything even more stuff improbably missed
Sep 4 2014 8:54PM
0 3
profile picture
ZachAndCheese
Posts: 816 - Karma: 5,116
socal_skierim 12 i bought my whole kit so how do you feel. I bought my skis,pants,jackets,goggles,helmets,poles.face mask,boots,bindings. Everything even more stuff improbably missed


Wow you're grandparent's must be stacked
Sep 4 2014 9:33PM
1 0
All times are Eastern (-4)