Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

2003 Line Mavericks....

profile picture
west
Posts: 5229 - Karma: 36
has anyone ridden the 2003 line mavericks.....if so what are they like...opinions.....



thanks....peace....-west
Jul 2 2002 8:30PM
0 0
profile picture
BrodyLeven
Posts: 7016 - Karma: 187
i demoed them at coc. nice. quite soft. i like. then i breakdanced and won a pair of skogens..ha.

Brody
i wont drop out of high school for skiing, mom

www.fateclothing.com
any fate questions or orders, let me know.
Jul 2 2002 8:55PM
0 0
profile picture
jizack
Posts: 2486 - Karma: 16
thats like their entry level ski if i remmeber right.
if your monkey was misbehaving, would you spank it?
Jul 2 2002 9:08PM
0 0
profile picture
BrodyLeven
Posts: 7016 - Karma: 187
really? hm. is that a sign? since i kinda liked them?

Brody
i wont drop out of high school for skiing, mom

www.fateclothing.com
any fate questions or orders, let me know.
Jul 2 2002 11:01PM
0 0
profile picture
Guest
Posts: 0 - Karma: 0
I skied them in january.. they are pretty sick... if you are looking for a cheap but quality twin tip then try them out and see what you think.

i personally like them better than the 171 mike nick pro.

____________________
p.a.t. productions
Jul 2 2002 11:05PM
0 0
profile picture
Sean14456
Posts: 4792 - Karma: 38
lol, havent heard much about them, someone clue me in

Skiing In New Jersey Sucks-Trust Me
Jul 2 2002 11:14PM
0 0
profile picture
T-lo
Posts: 1004 - Karma: 10
they are a ski for the beginning freestyle skier that still wants to ski the whole mountain. They are super soft and don't have a huge twin tip like the rest of the line skis. They look crappy in my opinioin.

T-lo
Representin' the Midwest
Jul 2 2002 11:54PM
0 0
profile picture
Dirty
Posts: 679 - Karma: 12
i personally like the ski... i skied them a bit in january... they are cheap but still pretty good... soft, i like them better than the 171 mike nick pro.

there worth demoing at least.. a good ski if you dont have much money.

dmb

'I smoke the greenest grass, my bitch got the meanest ass, and for the taste of clit i dont have to waste a whole case a grits, all it takes is my pretty face and my gangsta wit.'
Jul 2 2002 11:59PM
0 0
profile picture
BK
Posts: 2353 - Karma: 1,122
damn, i rode the 2001 skogens at whistler and i could barely stand up on the damn things, they skied like shit, and its not that i suck even though it sounds that way. Is line stepping it up next season or what? Cause i think their skis look really cool.
Jul 3 2002 2:46AM
0 0
profile picture
BrodyLeven
Posts: 7016 - Karma: 187
i got the ....i dont know what year...not the ..oo skis i guess, i got the 00 skogens, the ones with the ship. i won them hehe

Brody
i wont drop out of high school for skiing, mom

www.fateclothing.com
any fate questions or orders, let me know.
Jul 3 2002 11:03AM
0 0
profile picture
T-lo
Posts: 1004 - Karma: 10
It's half as high as front tip.

T-lo
Representin' the Midwest
Jul 3 2002 1:16PM
0 0
profile picture
vegabond
Posts: 1235 - Karma: 11
MAVERICK ---
LENGTH(cm) 150 160 170 180

SUGESTED RIDER HEIGHT(cm) 152+ 160+ 167+ 175+

TIP/WAIST/TAIL WIDTH(mm) 101/74/91 105/74/93 105/74/94 106/74/95

SIDECUT RADIUS(m) 17.5 18.5 20 21

TIP/TAIL HEIGHT(mm) 55/30 55/30 55/30 55/30

STANCE BACK FROM CENTER(mm) n/a n/a 74 74

RUNNING SURFACE(mm) 1215 1316 1434 1499


Moe.

Pimps dont pay taxes.
Jul 3 2002 1:29PM
0 0
profile picture
PhattTim
Posts: 13943 - Karma: 83
woot woot. I like the skogens. Thought they skied really nicely on hard-pack, ice and in about 5 inchs of pow. I really liked them. Could get decent enough speed just have to lean back a bit. It's all about adaption, a truely good skier can make any ski do what they want, you just gotta work a little harder.

~~Phunkin Phatt Phreerider~~
'We are slaves to the labor of love that winter brings us every year.'
*I love Matty Enns*
Jul 3 2002 11:18PM
0 0
profile picture
vegabond
Posts: 1235 - Karma: 11
Skogen Sprang Pro Model
Length(cm) - 176
Sugested Rider Height(cm) - 167+
Tip/Waist/Tail Width(mm) - 108/78/100
Sidecut Radius(m) - 19
Tip/tail Height(mm) - 56/56
Stance Back From Center(mm) - 57
Running Surface(mm) - 1434

Moe.

Pimps dont pay taxes.
Jul 3 2002 11:25PM
0 0
profile picture
Guest
Posts: 0 - Karma: 0
is it just me or are the mavericks wicked set back?
____________________
p.a.t. productions
Jul 4 2002 12:28AM
0 0
profile picture
BrodyLeven
Posts: 7016 - Karma: 187
how tall are yall on your skogens? i won them, and am still thinking i will use 12's this season.
problem:how much will the line bindings be? and will the new 1260's only be able to use the 4x4 instert pattern?

Brody
i wont drop out of high school for skiing, mom

www.fateclothing.com
any fate questions or orders, let me know.
Jul 5 2002 1:41AM
0 0
profile picture
vegabond
Posts: 1235 - Karma: 11
k, i dont remmeber the price of the bindings, but i i remember that there will be like 2-3 models, with different din settings, and like the lowest was like 200-250 or somthin (not accurate.. i just dont feel like finding the price agian) and about next years lines, you can like mount them with other bindings like any ski, but why would you want to? i say just keep the skogens and buy the line bindings..mount them, and the will be the last pair of bindings u will ever buy.

Moe.

Pimps dont pay taxes.
Jul 5 2002 10:22AM
0 0
profile picture
T-lo
Posts: 1004 - Karma: 10
There is 2 models of the bindings, the Turbo 10 and the Turbo 12. The 12 has a higher heel DIN (4-12 instead of the 3-10 that the turbo 10 has) and it had high density suspension for a stiffer ski flex.

T-lo
Representin' the Midwest
Jul 5 2002 2:20PM
0 0
profile picture
OkemoHucker
Posts: 169 - Karma: 10
What up brody, its Drew get ur skiis yet :)
Jul 6 2002 2:53AM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)