It's still pretty fucked up, like the bombings in Syria conducted by Israel which are actually indirect attacks on Iran. Syria and Iran are bound by a mutual defense treaty and are strategic alliances. The US and Israel's senate resolution 65, surely to pass states that congress reaffirms the long-standing bonds of friendship and cooperation between the United States and Israel, supports the full implementation of U.S. and international sanctions on Iran, recognizes the tremendous threat posed to the United States, the West, and Israel by Iran's pursuit of a nuclear weapons capability, yet they haven't even decided to create a nuclear warhead as stated by the CIA. It also urges that if Israel is compelled to take military action in self-defense against Iran's nuclear weapons program the U.S. government should provide Israel with diplomatic, military, and economic support. Thus, the foreign relations committee voting to endorse resolution 65, (April 17, 2013) is the latchkey should Israel attack Iran. By now, people should know Israel has openly indicated its desire to use military force on Iran. Formerly, on January 30th of this year the US government stated that the Syrian government was using chemical weapons against its own people. However, findings via Del Ponte state that it in fact was the Syrian rebels that used chemical weapons. Thus, mysteriously, the Obama Administration backed down from previous claims. I believe this was done to create the ostensible reason for military involvement. To back these claims, documents from a UK base defense contractor revealed that a plan by Qatari was to have the firm provide false evidence that Syria would give the go ahead to use chemical weapons in said country. According to these documents, this plan had full proof from the US government. Hence, NATO possibly facilitated the use of chemical weapons. Iran-backed Hezbollah weapons were said to be the target according to Israel. The real motive however, was to derail Syriaís progress in their fight against foreign militants originally from Lebanon. Hezbollah who sides with president Assadís regime, says that it was a war against foreign backed terrorists. Iran has sent over 4,000 troops to aid Assad and RUssia s-300, have responded to take Syria's side as well as China. Hence, NATO is backing up these rebels despite carnages and the use of chemical weapons. This is all about how Iran has one of the largest oil reserves; in addition they are not cooperating with the US. The USA's excuse to invade Syria is the excuse to draw Iran into an exposed conflict. The benefits using a figure head is that they are completely disposable. The Egyptian Revolution ties into what is going on in Syria. IMF/world bank loans, US backs this fully and ElBaradei urges consensus to win IMF. Suez Canal is a wanted geological feature (75% of worlds sea-trade.) Understand that the leaders of Egypt are puppets and when a puppet such as Mubarak does not send troops to Iraq during the 2003 invasion and rejects the joining of US Nuclear Umbrella the US will covertly fund opposition groups to take him out of office. Egypt at the time was the second largest power under foreign aid. THe leaders are puppets, Egypt's military should be reinvented in the case that they have the right to pick their leader.
Huh...What happened in January?
I ski ice.