Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Difference of Tokina 11-16mm DX II vs I

profile picture
FatWhore
Posts: 2213 - Karma: 1,098
Looking to add this to my small lens collection. Right now I have a Tamron 17-50 and looking to get something a little wider. I was looking at this lens and noticed there are two different versions. Could anyone tell me the difference bettween the two and if its worth buying the $200 more version II?
Jun 1 2013 7:24PM
3 0
profile picture
gusestomp
Posts: 1377 - Karma: 746
I believe it's just a silent motor. Could be wrong though. But if you're using it strictly for skiing, you'll be fine. Just shoot at a low aperture and everything is pretty much in focus.
Jun 1 2013 8:04PM
0 0
profile picture
p.hawks
Posts: 2832 - Karma: 581
besides the motor I think there is a new lens coating that is supposed to reduce flares. either way, the original 11-16 is a fantastic lens, and a new version doesn't make it any worse
Jun 1 2013 8:57PM
0 0
profile picture
CrotchKiller
Posts: 9037 - Karma: 6,940
that would be a con for me haha. I enjoy lens flare, especially the 11-16.
Jun 2 2013 3:44AM
2 0
profile picture
michael_bc
Posts: 1317 - Karma: 412
The differences are the AF motor (the Nikon mount version didn't have one) and the coating.

If you own a Nikon D3x00 or D5x00, it's quite useful to get the new version. Otherwise, it's not that important.
Jun 2 2013 9:12AM
0 0
profile picture
FatWhore
Posts: 2213 - Karma: 1,098
look like the DX I will work for me. Thanks all
Jun 2 2013 11:35AM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)