Well yes, thats the implication of my argument but obviously there are good social reasons why having sex in public should be frowned on, I never said that because social rules are made up there's not good reasons for some of them.
My argument is that I can't really see any compelling reason that women not wearing shirts in public will cause any harm once people get use to it and most of the arguments against it seem to be based on the idea that because it's a social rule it's natural and good for women not to expose their breasts. Have you ever been to a region where women don't cover their boobs? Once you get use to it, and it doesn't take long, its not a big deal at all. It's basically like being in the US, walk down the street, check out hot chicks with the difference being instead of wearing shirts that are designed to show off as much of their boobs as possible without fully exposing them they cut the crap, and ignore the older women.
Its not the same as going pant- less, boobs are sexy but they aren't sexual organs. The same arguments were probably used against women showing their ankles "oh women's legs are too sexual, society will go to hell if people can see them, what about the children, why would any self respecting women want to show people their legs?" When in reality it wasn't that big of a deal.
Oh and skiiermen you're right I was deeply offended. I'll get right to work on that growing up thing, although adding little bitch right after you told me to grow up was kind of ironic.
Here's a tip: instead of wearing an avalanche beacon just put a dog treat in your jacket.
That way, when the search and rescue dogs find your body, they can have a little treat.
Leave no turn unstoned.