Oreilly. I love you man, but shut the fuck up with intelligent design

Posts: 3295 - Karma: -192

Karma: -192

Posts: 3295

Addict

I think religion is a good thing, but I can't believe people still believe in intelligent design. Like how fucking dumb do you have to be to short sell evolutions capabilities because natures designs are too clever for your retarded brain

Nov 23 2012 8:32PM

1 0

easiestEC

Posts: 2471 - Karma: 489

Karma: 489

Posts: 2471

Addict

um, okay?

Nov 23 2012 8:51PM

0 0

Broommasta

Posts: 764 - Karma: 56

Karma: 56

Posts: 764

Ridiculous

and when you think about it, every organisms purpose is to survive and reproduce, so every animal that is alive today is a form of intellegent design by evolution

Nov 23 2012 8:53PM

0 0

~4EST_B_Skis~

Posts: 566 - Karma: -46

Karma: -46

Posts: 566

Ridiculous

its funny too see him when he knows he's starting to be wrong, so he will start taking things way beyond proportion

Nov 23 2012 8:55PM

0 0

Puns

Posts: 2052 - Karma: 429

Karma: 429

Posts: 2052

Addict

I can't believe some people still believe in religion.

But srsly I can understand and empathize why you would. I can do the same for intelligent design. People need to believe in these things, there's not any wrong or right beliefs, in general, only wrong and inappropriate actions that reduce the freedom of others.

Nov 23 2012 8:56PM

0 0

accualyisdolan

Posts: 3295 - Karma: -192

Karma: -192

Posts: 3295

Addict

An organisms purpose is not to reproduce. The organisms alive today are the genetic offspring of organisms that had a tendency to reproduce. So encoded on their genes is the same tendency towards reproduction. DNA doesn't know what it's doing, it just does. Organisms that do not have the tendency to reproduce will not have their genes represented in the next generation

Nov 23 2012 9:00PM

0 0

Broommasta

Posts: 764 - Karma: 56

Karma: 56

Posts: 764

Ridiculous

thankyou for expanding my knowledge, and organisms that dont have the tendencies to reproduce wont have a next generation? could you clarify

Nov 23 2012 9:28PM

0 0

Casey

Posts: 7785 - Karma: 23,466

Karma: 23,466

Posts: 7785

Crazy Fool

He's basically saying the same thing. Its not the inherent purpose of any organism to do anything, the ones that are alive are there because what they do is best suited for their environment so they are able to replicate themselves.

Nov 23 2012 9:33PM

0 0

accualyisdolan

Posts: 3295 - Karma: -192

Karma: -192

Posts: 3295

Addict

Think of our sex drive. It's genetic in origin. So if an organism has say a mutation and the sex drive gene is affected, that organism might not reproduce. We reproduce because our genes have set us up so that sex feels good. If an organism had genes such that sex wasn't a rewarding experience, it probably would not have sex/offspring. And if it doesn't have offspring then the "no sex drive" gene will not be present in the next generation. The next generation of offspring will be those whose parents had the sex drive gene intact, so they will have intact sex drive genes passed on to them from their parents.

Nov 23 2012 9:38PM

0 0

Broommasta

Posts: 764 - Karma: 56

Karma: 56

Posts: 764

Ridiculous

ok now the word tendencies makes sense. thank you for the lesson

Nov 23 2012 9:41PM

0 0

El_Barto.

Posts: 11630 - Karma: 24,465

Karma: 24,465

Posts: 11630

Crazy Fool

Have you ever heard cats doing it? That doesnt sound enjoyable and they do it anyway. I think cat dicks even have like barbs on em. You get fucked by that and tell me it feels food

Nov 23 2012 9:43PM

0 0

accualyisdolan

Posts: 3295 - Karma: -192

Karma: -192

Posts: 3295

Addict

Gooby prf avor

Nov 23 2012 9:45PM

0 0