Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

reactors or p12 jibs

profile picture
huckedmeat
Posts: 175 - Karma: 13
If you were 150 lbs, 5 foot 11, great skier, mostly park some small mountain, and you had a pair of 03/04 pollards, would you get reactor bindings or p12 jibs and where would you mount them.
Oct 17 2004 8:31PM
0 0
profile picture
Just_Bob
Posts: 35 - Karma: 10
p12 jibs... they're proven, while the reactors are not... and ive found them cheaper than reactors... and reactors have less energy transfer onto the skis or so i hear because of their Line Mounting system...

and I get my skis mounted where the ball of my foot is over the balance point on the skis. but thats just my preference
Oct 18 2004 12:07AM
0 0
profile picture
schlonginator
Posts: 3971 - Karma: 27
you cant go wrong with p12s - they're such a versatile binding that all three pairs of my skis are mounted with them




___________________________
''Shake it like a polaroid picture''
Oct 18 2004 1:00AM
0 0
profile picture
dawilltoski
Posts: 1649 - Karma: 10
go with the reactors the tech is so unbelievable, ^^ these guys are biased cuz they have no experience with reactor (im guessing i rode the p12s and they are good but the reactor is really worth it.



Line Skis
Logic Headware
Orage
Jibij Proshop
Oct 18 2004 8:17AM
0 0
profile picture
ElliotH
Posts: 201 - Karma: 10
nigga please i saw some fool with those gay ass reactors the others day massin around with them cause they werent workin and if you look at were the brake is set its wicketywhack
p12s fo sho, reactors should still be in R+D
Oct 18 2004 5:05PM
0 0
profile picture
jibij--intern
Posts: 99 - Karma: 10
reactors, trust me they are sooooo much better then looks i have helped mount a few and they kick fucking ass definatly the reactors
Oct 18 2004 5:08PM
0 0
profile picture
J.D.
Posts: 21362 - Karma: 5,141
I'm sure the reactors are great bindings and everything, but those plates under them are more than a little ridiculous. It's like a 15mm rise, and more if you have to adapt them. Look is cheaper, not to mention tried and tested.

------------
In a haze
A stormy haze
I’ll be around
I’ll be loving you
Always
Always

Here I am
And I’ll take my time
Here I am
And I’ll wait in line
Always
Always...
Oct 18 2004 5:09PM
0 0
profile picture
Jib_This
Posts: 8272 - Karma: 9
Anyone bitching about the plate COMPLETELY misses the point of the Reactor, and how it works. The plate is 100% necessary to the functioning of the binding. As for weight, you'd have to be a pretty big idiot to recommend a P12, P14, or any Look race stock binding over a Reactor, because they're either almost as or just as heavy as Line's binding. Try picking up a Reactor in one hand and a high end look binding in the other some time, you'll see it pretty much instantly.




'No i dont care about your post count, i care about you being a cocksucker.'
Crystalneedsa...
'My friend's and I formed a NO GIRLS ALLOWED club when we were little. Then we gave it up when girls made my penis get hard'
Midwest_rep
'I think skiing in general is just a phase'-My friend Josh.
Oct 18 2004 5:55PM
0 0
profile picture
dontH8innovate
Posts: 762 - Karma: 10
Looks suck they make the tail feel to long, go with the reactors
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
'Nobody spends more time on his knees than George W. Bush.' - Shaggy
Oct 18 2004 7:47PM
0 0
profile picture
tandan83
Posts: 2783 - Karma: 141
im just curious as to how the plate is necessary for the binding to function or whatever. and overshot...that was the dumbest thing i've ever heard. go bury your head in the sand



shit happens when you party naked


Oct 18 2004 8:02PM
0 0
profile picture
Henry
Posts: 2013 - Karma: 41
it all depends on what kind of stance you want really, cuz with the reactors you only get one choice, the reactors are sick tho
---------
I am Ben Wallace
Oct 18 2004 8:08PM
0 0
profile picture
TwinTipRider
Posts: 1398 - Karma: 10
reactors all the way man ... they are such a nice binding .. maybe not tested by to many ppl on NS but the pro tem uses them all the time. and i dont thin they would use them if they sucked ... plus some ppl on NS have used them and said they kick ass.

---------------
Is it something i said so fuck you to.
Oct 18 2004 8:20PM
0 0
profile picture
powwrangler
Posts: 286 - Karma: 11
Go for the reactors if you don't mind a heavy binding. I would also suggest them if you have more than one pair of line ski then you can switch between with only one binding. just keep those 4 screws tight though.
Oct 18 2004 8:59PM
0 0
profile picture
dspin7x
Posts: 6414 - Karma: 63
p12 they kick ass, while all the guys above are talking out of their ass cause they havent even skied them yet.

'Don't fuck with me 'cause I'm going to delete everything you ever post and have ever posted - Flanker, A moderator
Oct 18 2004 9:01PM
0 0
profile picture
tandan83
Posts: 2783 - Karma: 141
this goes to everyone cause hardly anyone knows this...the line bindings are adjustable on the plate to provide a more foreward and rearwar(?) stance. it's not just one stance option. you can set it up for park or big mtn.



shit happens when you party naked


Oct 18 2004 9:05PM
0 0
profile picture
Henry
Posts: 2013 - Karma: 41
thank you tandan, i did not know that, reactors all the way
---------
I am Ben Wallace
Oct 18 2004 10:37PM
0 0
profile picture
doGelyst
Posts: 2491 - Karma: 508
to make it simple.....people say go with proven quality....look/rossi bindings. Sounds fair. Now lets look at previous Line bindings....Pivogy....proven crap. :P
-
oaktreely
Oct 18 2004 11:04PM
0 0
profile picture
LineBoarder
Posts: 3762 - Karma: 84
i second the jibs.. i got em, they are badass





'I'm far from broke, got enough bread and mad hoes, ask Beavis I get nuttin Butt-head' - Big L

* Empire Freeride, Session 3*
Oct 19 2004 12:23AM
0 0
profile picture
conifercatcher
Posts: 400 - Karma: 10
The reactors weigh more than the pivot 12, it lifts you a long ways off the ski, the brakes dont engage cleanly, they have to be mounted in one certain spot, and they overall just dont seem safe. When mounting these bindings they dont even really go together very well when trying to install the brake. If the reactor is so safe, then why the fuck dont all of the line riders use those bindings? The idea behind the reactor seems allright, but they need to work some shit out if they want to have happy customers.
He calls himself Lord of the Dance? I think we all know what happened the last time someone called themselves lord of anything.
Oct 19 2004 10:46AM
0 0
profile picture
OCHO
Posts: 319 - Karma: 732
p12 jib for sure.
Oct 19 2004 5:44PM
0 0
profile picture
Bangor
Posts: 9599 - Karma: 129
i've owned the reactors for 2 seasons, i love them. they're not that much heavier, they're super safe as they've saved my knees a few times, and they're solid.
___________________
- Ian
~~Phunkin Phatt Phreerider~~

'what a coincidence! i have an erection.' - Derek

'the objective was to get huge tits the size of mountains jack ass. i had to look at fat porn to make these.' - bitchassphatz

'and i was talking about the US. Montana is in canada' rodeo270
Oct 19 2004 9:44PM
0 0
profile picture
Bangor
Posts: 9599 - Karma: 129
and yes, dan, you can adjust the stance because of the plate :)
___________________
- Ian
~~Phunkin Phatt Phreerider~~

'what a coincidence! i have an erection.' - Derek

'the objective was to get huge tits the size of mountains jack ass. i had to look at fat porn to make these.' - bitchassphatz

'and i was talking about the US. Montana is in canada' rodeo270
Oct 19 2004 9:52PM
0 0
profile picture
aclsarescary
Posts: 4010 - Karma: 31
the reactors are the same height off the ski as everyother binding except looks. Looks are really coo how close to the ski they are, but the line reactor is the best to happen to skiing right now.
Oct 20 2004 5:33AM
0 0
profile picture
r_witt
Posts: 911 - Karma: 10
^^ have they even been out that long?
~~~~~~~~~~~~

if i had no hands, id have a tee shirt that said, 'ever been stump fucked?' - cj
Oct 20 2004 12:53PM
0 0
profile picture
real9999
Posts: 652 - Karma: 10
I wouldn't worry about the weight. Reactors weigh a ton. P12's weigh a ton. And race stock bindings weight 2 tons.

-T
Oct 20 2004 1:09PM
0 0
profile picture
freeskier108
Posts: 921 - Karma: 12
Im really confused as to why LINE decided to have such a huge lift on their bindings... after all, they were a Twin Tip only company, just doesnt make much sense...
www.absoluteskishop.com
Oct 20 2004 5:28PM
0 0
profile picture
dj_monster_
Posts: 620 - Karma: 12
COME ON GUYS!

How bout you guys all go and look at the bindings on the webpage, they have the plate in the middle for TWO reasons..... one so they can use the 4 screw system to interchange your binding to your skis and two so they can use the park mountain/ big mountain positioning system......... i would wait a year for the Line Reactors to become true and tested but they defiantly use a cool technology and I would suggest looking into it....... anyways you could always buy both if u have the cash?

cheers


What skiing will become$$$

Hey, does anyone know what would be better for me, a narcoleptic bulldozer, or an irish wolfhound who thinks he's Hillary Duff? - J.D._May


Not wearing poles is alot like getting a blowjob from a guy...It feels good until you look down and realize you're gay.

Oct 20 2004 5:47PM
0 0
profile picture
Bangor
Posts: 9599 - Karma: 129
1080ryebread: sort of. i bought them off of a line rep 3 years ago now, when they were originally supposed to be released. basically i got them during the limited edition 2 seasons ago. then the plastic supplier went to hell, and that screwed line over for a season of production. so yes, they have been. sort of.

whoever was talking about the lift, it's as much as any other binding. it's really not that noticeable when you ride them. i don't notice much difference between my reactors + darksides and my salomon s710's + salomon verses

even more info in this thread
___________________
- Ian
~~Phunkin Phatt Phreerider~~

'what a coincidence! i have an erection.' - Derek

'the objective was to get huge tits the size of mountains jack ass. i had to look at fat porn to make these.' - bitchassphatz

'and i was talking about the US. Montana is in canada' rodeo270
Oct 20 2004 9:02PM
0 0
profile picture
huckedmeat
Posts: 175 - Karma: 13
i got some p12 jibs for $180, i just didnt want to have to buy that adapter piece of shit if i got skis other than line, which i probably will next
Oct 22 2004 1:57PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)