Okay basicly kids this is how it breaks down.
Park skis suck ass. It doesn't matter if they are line, salomon, dynastar, etc. Park skis in general are made with some of the shittiest materials on the market today.
A typical park ski, is a foam core, cap construction with no type of lateral re-enforcement, basicly the most ass cheap possible way to produce a ski PERIOD. why don't they spend more on park skis? Read my reply to the artical: 'the truth about this hell shitty industry'
I'm backing up Dirty, A soild skier can ski more or less any ski, anywhere. The two layers of Ti in the 03 mothership give it the best dampening and drive at speed through shit cake crud of any 182 twin tip I have ever ridden. Thats not to say that it skis like full blown freeride ski. If you want a ski that can hold its own in the shit, you'd better get one designed specificly for that purpose. Point- if you want a park ski get a park ski, if you want to go shred the gnar, go get a ski designed for that purpose, neither can replace the other. Buy two pairs of skis and quit bitching.
But back to park skis, Line does not suck, they have the best warrenty policy of any ski company around, if your edge cracks, or they delam they replace the ski. Good luck getting salomon to do that.
Support the companies that support skiing.