I have and personally I don't mind Fox's political or social views that's not the problem. What bothers me and most people is the fact that Fox news generally distorts certain events for the betterment of there own opinions. They continually try to discredit any sort opposing views by discrediting them ( As seen in this video). The job of a news organization is to find and report news to the public. Then it's the job of the people to take that information and form a personal opinion. If you wanna watch some news without a biased view watch BBC.
True its not all Fox's fault both are equally retarded.But Bill O'Riley a respected news caster for Fox who has millions of viewers asked how tides work to discredit a even more retarded argument made by some joey that nobody knows about. I mean you would think if you are in that position you have a responsibility to not be that ignorant.
BAHAHAHAHAHAHHH!!!!1........because Mass Media is the 4th branch of the Government, silly :P
......No, really.......our Government OWNS the corporation outright, it is their personal "fair and balanced" mouthpiece to the General Populous. We wouldn't have been able to INVADE the Middle East without them. Turn off the TV and Get Learned.
cooooooper- And that's why your icon represents you, a brave-hearted, good man. While mine, a pile of donuts, because well....I was hungry as fuck the day I made my account....
Ok he's not a great representation of Atheism, but Bill O'Reilly is a great representation of ignorant over zealous Catholics.
"Dude, we gotta get some new Jiberish so we can be thug and look like we're related to Eazy E when we're on the hill!"
"Yeah broski, after I stop this pretzel 4 I'll go on NS on my phone and buy some from BigSpence, I heard he has more in stock than AbstractMall!"
"this thread makes me look like a genius, thats how bad it is" - ECB
I'm gonna custom order a 2XL POC helmet so I can layer it with my other helmet.
Gonna have to disagree here. It seemed like the atheist guy was simply shocked at the fact that O'Reilly suggested that we don't know how tides worked - or that the fact that there are tides at all is proof of the existence of god. When you're arguing with someone as willingly ignorant and so clearly lacking in the ability for logical thought as O'Reilly, refuting his point by saying that we actually know that the moon/sun cause tides would probably be pointless.