I agree everyone think BC2 is just some COD rip off but they are only alike in the fact that it is a FPS. COD you run around randomly and shoot whoever you come upon. Battlefield you have A sqaud of ppl that are your life lines. If you go down your squad will try to revive you. There is also much more srategy invovled. Most often a line will from and you have to use real battle strategy to puch the enemy back. Also COD maps are like 16 PPL and they're tiny. BC2 has like 32 player maps and BF2142 has 64 player maps. Also BC2 has the Frostbite graphics engine. You can cut down trees with C4 demoilsh building or anyhting. You can littereally blow a hole in anything in the maps. It makes it much more realistic. My friend was hardcore COD he used to say Battlefield is worse than doin nuthing but we got him to play 30 minutes of BC2 and he bought the game later that day. Also BF started the FPS rage with BF1942 1 year before the first COD game. So all you COD players Prejiduced against BF give it a muther fukcing chance.