Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Wikileaks

profile picture
NL_twoplank
Posts: 118 - Karma: 40
Well so theres this little thing going on in the world which all of you have probably heard about. What do you think abouth what wikileaks are doing, is it correct that he should be arrested and is it dangerous for people? just write done what you think about wiki leaks

and also watch this vid wiki leaks put up. it is really horrible,http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5rXPrfnU3G0&feature=player_embedded#!


Ps: i am not against americans,
Dec 6 2010 3:20PM
0 0
profile picture
thugaim
Posts: 2181 - Karma: 33
nou
Dec 6 2010 10:29PM
0 0
profile picture
Uncle.Badness
Posts: 2545 - Karma: 55
Perhaps, but one battle can't win a war.
Dec 6 2010 10:29PM
0 0
profile picture
Arabian.
Posts: 9632 - Karma: 54
Case and point: Nagasaki and Hiroshima.
Dec 6 2010 11:22PM
0 0
profile picture
LIL_WAT
Posts: 1900 - Karma: 475
This.
Dec 6 2010 11:31PM
0 0
profile picture
Arabian.
Posts: 9632 - Karma: 54
joint attack.
Dec 7 2010 12:03AM
0 0
profile picture
[tk]
Posts: 3863 - Karma: 1,906
he never said just
Dec 7 2010 12:44AM
0 0
profile picture
Arabian.
Posts: 9632 - Karma: 54
same day, same order, same war, same area.
Dec 7 2010 2:04AM
0 0
profile picture
RudyGarmisch
Posts: 25443 - Karma: 13,844
The website publishes documents it receives to the whole world. If you have problems with it, you have problems with one of the purest forms of media. If you dont want your dirty laundry broadcasted, either A)Lock it up better next time or B)Dont write that shit down.

Everyone seems to be focused on the founder of Wikileaks, when the only one I see culpable in any of this is the person(s) who originally obtained and sent all of this stuff over the Wikileaks.
Dec 7 2010 2:18AM
0 0
profile picture
Arabian.
Posts: 9632 - Karma: 54
Assange is simply the middle man. The broadcaster in a system of constant cable inputs from hackers and interceptors around the world. The only reason he's being scape-goated is because he's the only one of them they can FIND. The fact that they're going after him (and really, will that stop the newsfeeds?) shows they're desperate for someone, and they're willing to take what they can get.
Dec 7 2010 2:23AM
0 0
profile picture
Arabian.
Posts: 9632 - Karma: 54
Well Obama DID want a transparent government....

lol

I can't believe he's being framed for rape. I heard on NPR that even the Swedes admitted the overblown rape charges were politically driven. They're hoping to extradite him to the US to be tried as a terrorist, which is why he's on Interpol's top 10 most wanted....for sexual crimes. Since when have you seen a suspected rapist in the top 10 FBI's most wanted? lol. Everyone something to hide and it is scaring the shit out of the entire world that someone might expose their bullshit; "dirty laundry" as Rowen so eloquently put it.
Dec 7 2010 2:29AM
0 0
profile picture
Arabian.
Posts: 9632 - Karma: 54
*Everyone's got
Dec 7 2010 2:30AM
0 0
profile picture
ThaLorax
Posts: 21061 - Karma: 8,366
Have any of you actually heard Julian talk? I bet 90% of you didn't even know what wikileaks was before this recent episode.

He's for freedom of speech and freedom of information. Isn't that what our country is supposedly all about? Oh wait, that doesn't fit the current status quo of the elites lying out their asses for a pretty penny and us accepting it without question. Oh wait, that's what he's exposing with the freedom of speech and freedom of information...

My opinion? The government didn't do shit about older leaks he let out that were equally important. Now, suddenly, when governments are trying to push for internet censorship, this suddenly makes the mainstream? Mainstream media was afraid to touch wikileaks for years. They won't cover other similar information/sites about classified information because they don't want to use "stolen property", but all the sudden the media is willing to plaster this "stolen property" all over the headlines? Something's wrong here...
Dec 7 2010 3:47AM
0 0
profile picture
Twinjibber77
Posts: 6239 - Karma: 2,356
And everyone found out that the original video was bullshit a very, very long time ago.
Dec 7 2010 4:11AM
0 0
profile picture
EastCoast315
Posts: 3136 - Karma: 137
>mfw there aren't any
Dec 7 2010 5:19AM
0 0
profile picture
thugaim
Posts: 2181 - Karma: 33
inb4 1984
Dec 7 2010 9:01AM
0 0
profile picture
fujarome
Posts: 8630 - Karma: 1,561
with the number of references various people make about 1984 whenever government and power comes up, I'm forced to wonder if any of them have ever even read it.


by the way, assange turned himself in today in london. Good move because if he's got nothing to hide...then why not? Bad move because they will give him something he didn't even know he was hiding, and no one will ever know...
Dec 7 2010 11:29AM
0 0
profile picture
geteducated
Posts: 6410 - Karma: 86
i like how interpol was assigned to hunt down an alleged rapist.

thats like the fbi trying to hunt down who knocked over my garden gnome last night. not that i have a garden gnome.
Dec 7 2010 11:33AM
0 0
profile picture
thugaim
Posts: 2181 - Karma: 33
True... perhaps inb4 Brave New World would be more appropriate.
Dec 7 2010 11:35AM
0 0
profile picture
yellav
Posts: 10056 - Karma: 1,217
a man dedicated to upholding the rights of free speech and human rights being labeled as a terrorist by the majority of government officials. tight. keep watchin two and a half men and dancing with the stars though america, that bristol palin sures got a fine rack!
Dec 7 2010 11:44AM
0 0
profile picture
JamesR
Posts: 3396 - Karma: -12
Keep believing Assange isn't on the gov's payroll.
Dec 7 2010 11:47AM
0 0
profile picture
Anathema
Posts: 21048 - Karma: 5,061

as a valued member of the newschooler community, i feel compelled to voice my opinion on the matter.

...

that is all.

Dec 7 2010 11:51AM
0 0
profile picture
yellav
Posts: 10056 - Karma: 1,217
even if that were the case, how does that make my point any different. governments pullin up our dress and raping us from behind while our eyes are glued on call of duty 39: police state.
Dec 7 2010 11:52AM
0 0
profile picture
BootySpunk.
Posts: 8148 - Karma: 84
That is one of the worst conspiracy theories I have ever heard.
Dec 7 2010 12:20PM
0 0
profile picture
vailsux.com
Posts: 1769 - Karma: 440
In other more important news dozens of pakistani people were blown the hell up by two taliban suicide bombers yesterday.


Dec 7 2010 12:33PM
0 0
profile picture
ThaLorax
Posts: 21061 - Karma: 8,366
I'm a "conspiracy theorist" and I concur.
Dec 7 2010 12:34PM
0 0
profile picture
JamesR
Posts: 3396 - Karma: -12
Derp. I was making a joke because he sounded like a conspiracy theorist.
Dec 7 2010 12:37PM
0 0
profile picture
JamesR
Posts: 3396 - Karma: -12
The government is there to protect and serve. If you don't like it you can run for office.
Dec 7 2010 12:38PM
0 0
profile picture
ThaLorax
Posts: 21061 - Karma: 8,366
you thought he sounded like a "conspiracy theorist" because he doesn't follow the status quo? or was it because he was speaking the truth?
Dec 7 2010 12:41PM
0 0
profile picture
JamesR
Posts: 3396 - Karma: -12
Ruh roh. Better strap on my tin foil hat!
Dec 7 2010 12:45PM
0 0
profile picture
BootySpunk.
Posts: 8148 - Karma: 84
Are you serious?

It is people like you who just blindly follow the government's order when they label people as terrorists.

Just because someone is exposing the government's dirty laundry doesn't make them a conspiracy theorist. I don't know if you have even attempted to research Wikileaks but none of the information that has been released has been made up or even assumed to be true. It is all from inside sources within the government, leaks!

Wikileaks is just a middle man that people can release their leaks through and Julian Assange is the "lightning rod" that takes all the heat and pressure from governments all over the world. He is a ballsy motherfucker and for anyone to believe that having Assange in jail, which he is now, will stop Wikileaks from doing what they are doing is downright ignorant.
Dec 7 2010 12:47PM
0 0
profile picture
JamesR
Posts: 3396 - Karma: -12
Are you posting this from the fallout shelter under your parents' basement? The government doesn't just go around calling people terrorists. Assange is a rapist and a criminal that puts American lives in danger. I've heard he has ties with Al'Qaeda from inside sources.
Dec 7 2010 12:49PM
0 0
profile picture
ThaLorax
Posts: 21061 - Karma: 8,366
Please explain how supporting wikileaks expose corruption and promote transparency makes me a conspiracy theorist. THERE'S NO CONSPIRACY, IT'S TRUTH.
Dec 7 2010 12:53PM
0 0
profile picture
JamesR
Posts: 3396 - Karma: -12
Your an idiot. You called yourself a conspiracy theorist. I bet you think the Jews did 9/11 too.
Dec 7 2010 12:56PM
0 0
profile picture
BootySpunk.
Posts: 8148 - Karma: 84
Ugh I am not even going to bother arguing with you. You are too caught up in your own ignorance to accept the fact that maybe your precious government isn't as perfect as you believe it to be.

Also...would be amazing if you found some evidence or some source that shows Wikileaks has put American lives in danger. A death or anything caused by Wikileaks. Speculation doesn't count. Just because it may put American lives "in danger" doesn't mean it does or will.

And ties with Al'Qaeda...are you serious? You people will believe anything Fox news tells you.

PS. Way to assume I am a conspiracy nut just because I support Wikileaks. The news sure is doing their job correctly. Carry on sheeple.
Dec 7 2010 1:01PM
0 0
profile picture
yellav
Posts: 10056 - Karma: 1,217
its the blatant facts of the matter, not a conspiracy theory. one guy is standing up to the fat cat assholes who run the show all of a sudden is accused of rape and has INTERPOL after him and the almighty terrorist name tag is deemed upon him. thats a great way to set precedent for someone standing up for human rights and freedom on speech. unfortunately its a classic scenario of the past few centuries really.

Click for larger image

open your eyes man, foreign banks and foreign corporations, fuck even MCDONALDS, was given hundreds of billions of dollars in bailout money. its not for the people, its for the corporations. look up the definition of facism.
Dec 7 2010 1:05PM
0 0
profile picture
JamesR
Posts: 3396 - Karma: -12
Ok. Now go back and read my post at the bottom of page one. Anarcho-capitalist here bro. No hard feelings? hehe :3
Dec 7 2010 1:07PM
0 0
profile picture
BootySpunk.
Posts: 8148 - Karma: 84
So you were a trolling?

Well if you were than my words are directed at someone who actually believe what you said. Because there are many of them out there.

Also...here is a story about the whole "rape" accusations.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1307137/Supporters-dismissed-rape-accusations-WikiLeaks-founder-Julian-Assange--women-involved-tell-different-story.html
Dec 7 2010 1:12PM
0 0
profile picture
JamesR
Posts: 3396 - Karma: -12
Yus. I support Wikileaks, and the rape accusations are ridiculous.
Dec 7 2010 1:31PM
0 0
profile picture
RubberSoul
Posts: 11249 - Karma: 14,642
who are you even talking to here?
Dec 7 2010 1:37PM
0 0
profile picture
BootySpunk.
Posts: 8148 - Karma: 84
I am just going to say I won an argument on NS and converted you. Deal? :)

Just kidding but glad to know that there is one less idiot in the world than I thought there was.
Dec 7 2010 1:48PM
0 0
profile picture
ThaLorax
Posts: 21061 - Karma: 8,366
i love it when people don't know how to react so they just reduce themselves to namecalling. good comeback!

there's a difference from a conspiracy THEORY (which doesn't have solid evidence but is interesting to research nonetheless) to conspiracy to hide the truth (which has factual evidence to back it up).
Dec 7 2010 1:51PM
0 0
profile picture
JamesR
Posts: 3396 - Karma: -12
Read my latest posts.
Dec 7 2010 2:01PM
0 0
profile picture
mer-man
Posts: 1079 - Karma: 10
   but you have to agree this transpearasy or public release with foregin relations in not in the best of intrest of a civilization. Regarding any sort of trade, or public image with other countries. I mean in this its gunna reck the Americans sense of authority and solidit. This is not in are best intrest.

      I'm just saying that from a Grand Perspective stand point. This really only makes things worse in regards to public relations in the middle east, or really anywhere. Its not like the President, Senators or really any members... of government are going with hold something that's not in their own best interests. Consequently these very people will benefit most when the country is doing well. Therefore when a bunch of secret documents are released grandly its not good for a civilization. If only Canadians had access to these documents everything would be fine. Its the huge impact it has on the Image of solidity and strength of the Americans. We are tied by near degree of a life line to the US. Its awesome to know and super interesting. But in no way dose it have a positive impact on are economy. Which by the way is far from great.
Dec 7 2010 2:01PM
0 0
profile picture
thugaim
Posts: 2181 - Karma: 33
>Lets censor things that make us look bad.
Dec 7 2010 3:58PM
0 0
profile picture
ThaLorax
Posts: 21061 - Karma: 8,366
90% of people in this thread. you being the 10%.
Dec 7 2010 4:52PM
0 0
profile picture
Coop8o2
Posts: 80 - Karma: 23

I pulled this from wikipedia, The last part is the most important. There is information that in the wrong hands can hurt us as a nation. Also the people who gather that information are put in harms way. Maybe you would understand this way. your friend tells you a secret about someone that they shouldnt of told you. You go back to that person and say "hey guess what I heard about you." The person now knows that the original friend broke their trust and might want to beat the shit out of them. thats how it harms people.

The desired degree of secrecy about such information is known as its sensitivity. Sensitivity is based upon a calculation of the damage to national security that the release of the information would cause. The United States has three levels of classification: confidential, secret, and top secret. Each level of classification indicates an increasing degree of sensitivity. Thus, if one holds a top-secret security clearance, one is allowed to handle information up to the level of top secret, including secret and confidential information. If one holds a secret clearance, one may not then handle top-secret information, but may handle secret and confidential classified information.

By law, information may not be classified merely because it would be embarrassing or to cover illegal activity; information may only be classified to protect national-security objectives.

Dec 7 2010 5:26PM
0 0
profile picture
*DrewT*
Posts: 7768 - Karma: 480
Well it looks like he's going to win TIME magazine's person of the year award... and rightfully so
Dec 7 2010 5:29PM
0 0
profile picture
Coop8o2
Posts: 80 - Karma: 23

what about reports about places around the world and in the US that are considered at risk targets for terrorism. Granted some of them might already be on the radar of extremist groups but what about the other ones that weren't? don't get me wrong, If a document has been declassified then there is no problems with releasing it to the public but to share classified and secret information is just wrong.

Dec 7 2010 6:03PM
0 0
profile picture
ElbridgeGerry
Posts: 5902 - Karma: -27
I remember him turning in some army pfc for submitting super sensitive material to Wikileaks. Julian Assange seems to be a stand up guy, he did the right thing in telling the US government about that one.


As for him raping some chick? well she's probably lying for fame.
Dec 7 2010 6:15PM
0 0
profile picture
ElbridgeGerry
Posts: 5902 - Karma: -27
Well here in the Kawarthas we don't need to use condoms. We have sex with livestock.
Dec 7 2010 6:19PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)