Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Best lenses to shoot skiing with

profile picture
gaddafski
Posts: 165 - Karma: 111
since its that time of year im looking to buy a new lense and i was curious to know what you all prefer when it comes to shooting skiing, i have a t1i btw.

i searched this but couldnt find anything, sorry if its a repeat
Nov 16 2010 8:58PM
0 0
profile picture
WillStart
Posts: 3955 - Karma: 3,192
pretty expensive but i love my canon 17-55mm f/2.8 IS. i've heard the 70-200mm f/2.8 IS is amazing as well, f/4 is solid too if you're looking for something cheaper
Nov 16 2010 8:59PM
0 0
profile picture
[~_~]
Posts: 20239 - Karma: 1,273
Tokina 11-16 for wide
Any of the Canon 70-200 telephotos; you can't go wrong. the f/4 is surprisingly amazing for what it is.
Nov 16 2010 9:21PM
0 0
profile picture
solitaryman
Posts: 3578 - Karma: 123
What do you mean, for what it is?  By that im assuming you mean: some of the highest quality glass in the game lmao?  It's L glass, and USM AF which is unreasonably good? shooting skiing you wouldn't need anything below f/4 anyways because of snow glare.  If you're shooting at night, shoot a longer exposure on a tripod.

Amazing lens, period.
Nov 16 2010 9:25PM
0 0
profile picture
1337
Posts: 31038 - Karma: 29,002
11-16
17-40
24-105
70-200
300

lineup of champions
Nov 16 2010 9:47PM
0 0
profile picture
[-mvee-]
Posts: 1713 - Karma: 10
i think thats gunna be my next lens, a canon telephoto. not to sure yet.

from what ive heard my canon f/4 17-40 is gunna be great for follow shots. i mean if eheath said so you know its true! haha.
Nov 16 2010 9:50PM
0 0
profile picture
TWoods
Posts: 10014 - Karma: 8,385
If I had to choose just a couple lenses, I would choose:

- A fisheye that will work well on your t2i. Probably just whatever the canon one is for crop sensors. Some people don't like fisheyes, I think the distortion can be real good if done well.

- a super wide, maybe the tokina 11-16. that's not much zoom range, but if you're going wide, you are doing so for a reason.

- a medium zoom, something in the 24-70 range. There's LOTS of lenses in this category, so shop around. Some people prefer the 18-whatevers over the 24, I find I rarely feel the need to shoot between 24mm and 15mm.

- something that's 70-200 ish. Again, lots of options. There's a 70-200 f4 in the canon L series that it seems like people like, but I don't know much about the canon lineup.


This is all personal preference, it all depends on the shot you want and what sort of skiing you like shooting. I also don't know what your price range is. Hope that helps though!
Nov 16 2010 10:01PM
0 0
profile picture
IanAvery-Leaf
Posts: 9926 - Karma: 9,344
you sound like the type of person that shoots at the lowest aperture 97.5% of the time....

lower aperture = lower sharpness sweet spot, thats why f2.8 still trumps the f4 version, even though your not shooting snow at f2.8
Nov 16 2010 10:03PM
0 0
profile picture
solitaryman
Posts: 3578 - Karma: 123
Actually, I don't.

Obviously yes, the 2.8 is still better for the reasons you mentioned (although it's not as sharp as the f/4 IS period) and low light purposes but some people can't fork out that much cash (including myself) when they're starting out their kit.  But, fuck it, if you read test charts on a 70-200 f/4 IS, the lens is pretty much optimal throughout the whole range, with hardly any loss of IQ at f/4.  It's the sharpest of all 4 mark one 70-200's. So, my comment stands, and if you want to you could shoot it at f/4 97.5% of the time.


Riddle me that one, Batman.
Nov 16 2010 10:12PM
0 0
profile picture
SeanTom
Posts: 7936 - Karma: 1,747
the 80-200 is a must have. I love mine so much, works for everything. but as put above the ideal kit consists of a lens from each catagory.

Nov 16 2010 10:16PM
0 0
profile picture
Jordan
Posts: 4079 - Karma: 2,122
yep! 70-200 f/4 if you don't need the extra f/2.8 cha know?

10-24 or some wide angle
Nov 16 2010 10:28PM
0 0
profile picture
1337
Posts: 31038 - Karma: 29,002
^ and ^^

obvious nikonfags are obvious

although, the canon 80-200 2.8L USM is amazingggggggg. do want. If you can find it op, get it.
Nov 16 2010 10:31PM
0 0
profile picture
SeanTom
Posts: 7936 - Karma: 1,747
haha, i aint even mad. i love my nikon. My kit can always use improvements though
Nov 16 2010 10:34PM
0 0
profile picture
Jordan
Posts: 4079 - Karma: 2,122
fuck your couch bitch tits.
Nov 16 2010 10:46PM
0 0
profile picture
1337
Posts: 31038 - Karma: 29,002
nou
Nov 16 2010 10:48PM
0 0
profile picture
IanAvery-Leaf
Posts: 9926 - Karma: 9,344
+1

suck dat Canonfags (actually, mostly Jamie) ;)
Nov 16 2010 11:00PM
0 0
profile picture
J-Evs
Posts: 6387 - Karma: 1,615
thoughts on tamron 17-50?
Nov 16 2010 11:04PM
0 0
profile picture
IanAvery-Leaf
Posts: 9926 - Karma: 9,344
Ive heard the non VC version > the VC version in terms of sharpness

Jamie knows more about that lens though, inb4 1337?
Nov 16 2010 11:06PM
0 0
profile picture
1337
Posts: 31038 - Karma: 29,002
really really good lens. Very sharp (the non VC version is technically sharper) but getting VC would make all your shots really smooth. If I didn't have a aps-h sensor camera I would have bought it instead of a 17-40
Nov 16 2010 11:16PM
0 0
profile picture
J-Evs
Posts: 6387 - Karma: 1,615
word!

if you were gunna use it specifically for everyday filming and poppin ontop of a glidecam would you go with the vc or non vc?
Nov 16 2010 11:24PM
0 0
profile picture
1337
Posts: 31038 - Karma: 29,002
because I'm a jew I'd go the non-vc (its sharper too) but the VC would be hella legit, especially if you are doing some handheld shooting. If you have the money then I guess do it.
Nov 17 2010 12:14AM
0 0
profile picture
basedjase
Posts: 2510 - Karma: 640
Bahahaha! Yes im soo stealing this phrase.

But back on subject, i own a Tokina 11-16. its an amazing lens. the optics are so nice. very contrasty and sharp as a tack! Ive also got a Nikon 80-200 f/2.8. Same goes for that one, its a superb lens.
Nov 17 2010 12:44AM
0 0
profile picture
TWoods
Posts: 10014 - Karma: 8,385
phhhhhhhhttttt.
Nov 17 2010 1:45AM
0 0
profile picture
niels043
Posts: 814 - Karma: 184
canon 15mm f2.8 ($650)- great wide angle lens for a rebel, very sharp, not too much distortion but enough... and since it is a prime, you wont have to deal with barrel creep during high speed follow cams.

carl zeiss 50mm f1.4 ($700)- incredible lens, unmatched color accuracy, sharper than a sushi knife, great bokeh, built like a tank, and at $700 that is less than half what a canon 50mm f1.2L goes for.

70-200 f4L USM ($650)- Great light weight telephoto zoom lens. extremely sharp, very fast AF, very solid build quality, not to mention on days you will probably deem worthy to shoot on there will be more than enough light where you wont have to use low f-stops.
*besides the cost of a 70-200 f2.8L USM will get you a 70-200 f4L USM and a carl zeiss 50mm f1.4.
Nov 17 2010 11:59AM
0 0
profile picture
dergblerp
Posts: 1303 - Karma: 77
I've heard a lot of people say that the Canon 70-200 f4 Non IS is the sharpest of the 70-200 series. 
Whether or not this is true, I think this lens has a lot of value simply because it weighs a lot less than the other 3 canon 70-200's.  They're all great. 
Nov 17 2010 1:25PM
0 0
profile picture
[~_~]
Posts: 20239 - Karma: 1,273
No, Canon is far from the highest quality glass in the game. It's just decent. I really dislike most of the lenses, with the exception of the 70-200 f/4 non-IS and the 100mm macro.

And yes, you don't need anything faster than f/4 for skiing. Your lenses should be stopped down to lower apertures anyway, like f/8 - f/11.
Nov 17 2010 3:14PM
0 0
profile picture
gaddafski
Posts: 165 - Karma: 111
who shoots with the Tokina 11-16? Im thinking about buying it and i want to hear some honest thought on it
Nov 17 2010 9:37PM
0 0
profile picture
IanAvery-Leaf
Posts: 9926 - Karma: 9,344
read the thread

but honestly, you can't go wrong with it. Its the best aps-c ultrawide on the market right now
Nov 17 2010 9:56PM
0 0
profile picture
gaddafski
Posts: 165 - Karma: 111
if you've got any pics with the tokina can you post em up? itd be much appreciated
Nov 18 2010 3:25PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)