Taliban uses HIV needles in their bombs

unchyll

Posts: 4554 - Karma: 96

Karma: 96

Posts: 4554

No Life

maybe its finally time to nuke the shit out of the middle east

Jun 9 2010 4:37PM

0 0

vailsux.com

Posts: 1769 - Karma: 440

Karma: 440

Posts: 1769

Insane

i bet they get that shit shipped in from africa.

it's a huge market, virtually untapped.

Jun 9 2010 4:40PM

0 0

Astomp

Posts: 10090 - Karma: 344

Karma: 344

Posts: 10090

Crazy Fool

that sucks. my job over there is IED, EFP ineterdiction. so hopefully we stop some of these guys from this ineteresting debacle of HIV'ness and explosions.

Jun 9 2010 4:45PM

0 0

Sveetski

Posts: 572 - Karma: 22

Karma: 22

Posts: 572

Ridiculous

Dude that articles from the dailymail most racist bullshit newspaper ever they just work to keep everyone running scared and undermine the goverment I'm Not calling bullshit on the story just mabey get a better source

Jun 9 2010 5:00PM

0 0

feihlination

Posts: 8356 - Karma: 1,084

Karma: 1,084

Posts: 8356

Crazy Fool

1. source is not very reliable, and the guy with the propaganda is kinda right. you see it in this thread. the hate towards talibans skyrocketed.

2. transmission rate is way lower as it might be. according to the german wiki page, the average risk of getting HIV from a needle is under 1 percent (while actually being stitched). some factors raise (deeper stitch, more HIV-cells, etc) it, but from what i read, in the worst case it would be about 30 %.

3. in this thread were already some honorable mentions of weapons which western "civilized" countries used without hesitation. so "we" are as dirty. i just throw it out there: americans never took responsibility for the hiroshima/nagasaki incidents and never admitted that they were morally incredibly wrong.

in e-language, most of you guys got trolled. you hear "taliban use HIV as a weapon" and common sense (and 5 sec. internet recherches) are no options, just plain and direct hate towards talibans.

Jun 9 2010 5:15PM

0 0

skiierman

Posts: 28699 - Karma: -5,563

Karma: -5,563

Posts: 28699

@th1337

1. you don't hate the taliban? jesus. yeah man, i love terrorist organizations also!

2. who cares what the transmission rate is? what you're telling me is that its not that bad... go ahead, stab yourself with a HIV needle if its not that bad. its still a dick move with terrible intentions.

3. yeah there are weapons like napalm that we've used but that doesn't condone their actions. that's just some fucked up reasoning right there. and we never claimed to be morally wrong with dropping the atom bombs in japan because if you research (its a great tool!) you'll find out that it would have been a lot fucking worse if we never dropped the bombs and invaded japan, which we were going to do.

and again, if you like the taliban, you're fucking disgusting and an utter moron.

Jun 9 2010 5:24PM

0 0

jibbinc.

Posts: 3355 - Karma: 2,497

Karma: 2,497

Posts: 3355

Addict

is that legal?

Jun 9 2010 5:26PM

0 0

I.Love.Beezy

Posts: 2117 - Karma: 784

Karma: 784

Posts: 2117

Addict

Ouch....

Jun 9 2010 5:35PM

0 0

skiierman

Posts: 28699 - Karma: -5,563

Karma: -5,563

Posts: 28699

@th1337

we wiped out two cities. it was the lesser of two evils to end the war with japan without invading them- which would have ended up with way higher casualties. there's a reason no one has used a nuke on anyone since then.

Jun 9 2010 5:36PM

0 0

Astomp

Posts: 10090 - Karma: 344

Karma: 344

Posts: 10090

Crazy Fool

yeah it sucks big dick that they are doing this. shit. bummer. but worst thing theyve done? no. surprising? no. its a bummer thats for sure. i guess it just doesnt really surprise me.

Jun 9 2010 5:37PM

0 0

IanAvery-Leaf

Posts: 9926 - Karma: 9,344

Karma: 9,344

Posts: 9926

Crazy Fool

That just.....sucks

Jun 9 2010 5:39PM

0 0

DoublyDeeze

Posts: 625 - Karma: 3,863

Karma: 3,863

Posts: 625

Ridiculous

OR if you studied even more into WWII, Japan apparently was literally about to surrender but we dropped it anyways "just to make sure". But that contradicts my opinion that it was the right thing to do to drop it because basically the only use of nuclear weapons after that was just through the cold war and that obviously was all bluffing and nothing actually happened

Jun 9 2010 5:42PM

0 0

Squidles

Posts: 225 - Karma: 98

Karma: 98

Posts: 225

Loner

They didn't know about the affects of nuclear fallout until quite a while after the war, however they definetly knew about yield of a device like that.

Jun 9 2010 5:43PM

0 0

lahnabonny

Posts: 1260 - Karma: 35

Karma: 35

Posts: 1260

Insane

that's not the only reason, i've just never had to pump gas myself because there are countless places where i live that do it for me. that may sound lazy or bitchy, but it's the truth geeez.

and no one in the entire state of new jersey is allowed to pump gas themselves either so chill the eff outt

Jun 9 2010 5:47PM

0 0

fujarome

Posts: 8630 - Karma: 1,561

Karma: 1,561

Posts: 8630

Crazy Fool

well see, thats what called context. i didn't know you were from a state where its the law that they pump gas for you. That explains a hell of a lot more than just you seeming afraid to pump gas.

in any case, thats a pretty stupid law. What, do they not trust people to pump gas themselves?

Jun 9 2010 5:49PM

0 0

lahnabonny

Posts: 1260 - Karma: 35

Karma: 35

Posts: 1260

Insane

lol you misread my post. i'm not actually from new jersey, i'm from pennsylvania, but there are plenty of gas stations where i live that pump your gas for you, so it's pretty much the same thing.

and i have no idea why jersey has that law. i think it's so people don't just fill up their tank and then drive away. oh wellll

Jun 9 2010 5:52PM

0 0

ECB

Posts: 6991 - Karma: 618

Karma: 618

Posts: 6991

No Life

Yea everytime I'm in jersey, I also wonder if I'm supposed to tip the guy pumping or not. Do you?

Jun 9 2010 5:55PM

0 0

panojibber

Posts: 3382 - Karma: 216

Karma: 216

Posts: 3382

Addict

Maybe if the American government stopped being imperialist douchebags this kind of thing wouldn't happen and there would be no "terrorist" issue today. Seems like we're still stuck in a cold war, the people just don't know about it.

Sucks for the people who could potentially be the victims of this.

Jun 9 2010 5:55PM

0 0

skiierman

Posts: 28699 - Karma: -5,563

Karma: -5,563

Posts: 28699

@th1337

had an idea, but no idea how it would affect humans as in radiation sickness and other long term affects.

Jun 9 2010 5:56PM

0 0

skiierman

Posts: 28699 - Karma: -5,563

Karma: -5,563

Posts: 28699

@th1337

goes to show how little you know. japan wanted to surrender but japan's army wasn't. that was the problem. they saw defeat as the highest dishonor and they gladly would have taken total destruction rather than giving up. suicide mission of the yamato, troop buildups, rejection of the treaty that would have ended the war... all signs they were far from giving up. really though, its cute you think that.

Jun 9 2010 6:01PM

0 0

pmw

Posts: 5760 - Karma: 829

Karma: 829

Posts: 5760

No Life

you say this as if its fact

Jun 9 2010 6:02PM

0 0

skiierman

Posts: 28699 - Karma: -5,563

Karma: -5,563

Posts: 28699

@th1337

because it is? i thought it was common sense that no one had any idea of what a bomb like that would do to people in the short and long run. it even attributes to the rumor that the reason the bomb was dropped was to show it off to russia as like a "don't fuck with us, or else".

but hey i guess since the government is an evil-omnipotent being, they probably did know.

Jun 9 2010 6:05PM

0 0

Squid.

Posts: 1904 - Karma: 23

Karma: 23

Posts: 1904

Insane

ding ding we have a winner

Jun 9 2010 6:08PM

0 0

Peter.

Posts: 23796 - Karma: 13,012

Karma: 13,012

Posts: 23796

@th1337

people need to learn to actually read an article first before posting

Jun 9 2010 6:11PM

0 0

pmw

Posts: 5760 - Karma: 829

Karma: 829

Posts: 5760

No Life

this is still entirely based off assumption. your logic makes perfect sense, but it still isnt fact.

Jun 9 2010 6:15PM

0 0

skiierman

Posts: 28699 - Karma: -5,563

Karma: -5,563

Posts: 28699

@th1337

they never tested a nuke on people before using it on japan, that's pretty factual.

Jun 9 2010 6:18PM

0 0

Squidles

Posts: 225 - Karma: 98

Karma: 98

Posts: 225

Loner

Well, the first 'known' controlled nuclear test, that investigated the affects of radiation from nuclear fallout on living things was after the war and in 1946 and called Operation Crossrods or something like that.

Jun 9 2010 6:25PM

0 0

p.hawks

Posts: 2832 - Karma: 581

Karma: 581

Posts: 2832

Addict

hate to break it to you but theres no way the us would ever even think about using weapons on a 95% civilian population.

The terrorist don't all just live together in a well marked place. They r sneaky fuckers, and they are making us come and find them on their turf.

I doubt they even see our nukes as a threat because of this

Jun 9 2010 6:29PM

0 0

pmw

Posts: 5760 - Karma: 829

Karma: 829

Posts: 5760

No Life

of course it is factual, but you are still basing this entire argument off of assumptions and logic based factual evidence. it may not have been to the fullest extent, but im sure the government knew damn well the repercussions of dropping those bombs. im not disagreeing with you here, simply saying that your comments arent entirely factual.

Jun 9 2010 6:29PM

0 0

Squid.

Posts: 1904 - Karma: 23

Karma: 23

Posts: 1904

Insane

they didn't. you're wrong. i suggest you read Nagasaki 1945 by tatsuichiro akizuki for a good eyewitness report of the first radiation poisoning symptoms by a doctor. The Manhattan Project : the birth of the atomic bomb in the words of its creators, eyewitnesses and historians by cynthia kelly is also a good anthology of everything about the bomb. also the manhattan project by richard rhodes is a good source for more info. basically it's consensus among historians that nobody saw radiation sickness coming

Jun 9 2010 7:06PM

0 0

pmw

Posts: 5760 - Karma: 829

Karma: 829

Posts: 5760

No Life

thank you

Jun 9 2010 7:09PM

0 0

Thenowhereman42

Posts: 5682 - Karma: 65

Karma: 65

Posts: 5682

No Life

You know, as far as history goes, 50 years doesn't mean shit. There is a good chance we will again have to use the bomb.

Thank fuck I'm not in the army now, damn. I would rather die than get AIDS. I've actually thought about it before.

Jun 9 2010 7:50PM

0 0

PhaedeD

Posts: 11498 - Karma: 327

Karma: 327

Posts: 11498

Crazy Fool

i think the heat during the explosion would kill the germs... stupid arabs.

Jun 9 2010 7:56PM

0 0

Barefootin_Fiend

Posts: 7618 - Karma: 4,727

Karma: 4,727

Posts: 7618

Crazy Fool

Yeah, me too. I mean, look at Magic Johnson. He's only had HIV for almost 20 years and is still alive and kickin'.

I'm pretty sure that if you're diffusing bombs, HIV is the least of your concerns.

Jun 9 2010 7:57PM

0 0

YoungJah

Posts: 1106 - Karma: 66

Karma: 66

Posts: 1106

Insane

Stupid ragheads.

Jun 9 2010 8:11PM

0 0

Mr.Feeny

Posts: 990 - Karma: 11

Karma: 11

Posts: 990

Insane

fuck that dude, we just need to get all our allies, and all just go and beat the shit out of iraq, afghanastan, and korea one at a time, not divide the troops up

Jun 9 2010 8:20PM

0 0

DoublyDeeze

Posts: 625 - Karma: 3,863

Karma: 3,863

Posts: 625

Ridiculous

yeah honestly i dont see the point in have a very small portion of troops in south korea, sure north and south korea might break out again but why do our troops have to be involved...again

Jun 9 2010 8:47PM

0 0

MitchPee

Posts: 8871 - Karma: 1,510

Karma: 1,510

Posts: 8871

Crazy Fool

Our allies? Oh you mean Azerbaijan, Slovakia, Ethiopia, Poland, etc. Yes that is a great idea!

Jun 9 2010 9:02PM

0 0

twin-tip-hero

Posts: 2896 - Karma: 277

Karma: 277

Posts: 2896

Addict

what the FUCK.

Jun 9 2010 9:11PM

0 0

Thenowhereman42

Posts: 5682 - Karma: 65

Karma: 65

Posts: 5682

No Life

Not for me. Getting instantly disintegrated by a bomb wouldn't really be so bad. Having HIV would suck. You wouldn't be able to get laid.

I'd take a quick painless death over being permanently crippled or infected with a terminal illness any day. If I died right now I wouldn't even be that butthurt. I've done more drugs, slept with more women, been to more places, and had more experiences up to this point in my life than most people do in their entire lives. I also don't really see a future for myself at this point, I hate the direction my country/the world is going in, and things get worse every day. I do not fear death in the least.

If I got HIV I'd jump off a cliff and love every second of the way down. If I got crippled like I couldn't use my legs, that'd be cool, I'd get a monoski, move to a mountain town and just ski every day for the rest of my life, become a monoski instructor or something. But if my dick didn't work/paralysis below the next/whatever, I'd kill myself.

Jun 9 2010 9:11PM

0 0

304NordMan

Posts: 2980 - Karma: 521

Karma: 521

Posts: 2980

Addict

wow

Jun 9 2010 9:12PM

0 0

Zump.

Posts: 3338 - Karma: 305

Karma: 305

Posts: 3338

Addict

jesus, thats so fucked

Jun 9 2010 9:16PM

0 0

skiierman

Posts: 28699 - Karma: -5,563

Karma: -5,563

Posts: 28699

@th1337

we might use them again at one point but what i'll see is technology advancing enough that we can provide the same impact as a nuke but without the massive splash zone- very powerful, very accurate weapons.

Jun 9 2010 9:22PM

0 0

Kirsakid

Posts: 1793 - Karma: 126

Karma: 126

Posts: 1793

Insane

that is not cool fucking dirty scum doing such a thing hell why don't we bring out napalm, gas or just fucking nuke them then we'll see who likes playing dirty.

Jun 9 2010 9:36PM

0 0