first of all, i apologizing for i naming you either an idiot or a troll, but i found flaws and inaccuracies in a post attempting to absolve conspiracy theorists from idiocy, and i found the hypocrisy was most plainly shown as such.
also, while the patents for chemtrail devices do exist, all i can believe that they prove is that chemtrails are indeed possible, which i would not argued against. however, just because the technology has been created to produce them, does not mean that it has been implemented. there are thousands of patents that are never used. i'm going to use the toilet snorkel from the "what have you invented" thread as evidence.
as for the point on the likeliness that chemtrails have been covered up by the government, i don't believe this is true. this is the basis for our entire discussion: you believe one thing, i believe another. simply stating this again does little for me.
after doing some actual research on e. edward griffin (googling him, going to his website), i discovered that he isn't even an investigative journalist. he's a writer and filim producer. he makes opinionated films and books on controversial issues. he didn't report on laetrile or noah's ark, he promoted his (false) ideas on them. also, while i am truly sorry that you had to go through cancer, and i cannot even imagine what it would be like to go through, this does not change my point that he was wrong in this case.
in conclusion, i feel that i've begun writing posts on a website in formal, academic language, and so i'm going to bed
WM - You want your skis? Go get'em.
Rowen- I dont know what this is, but I'm banning it. (jacked)
CRJ - On the way down, its awesome