Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

First time on anything over 70mm

profile picture
skinnyskisrock
Posts: 40 - Karma: 10
So a buddy of mine is hanging up his carving sticks and wants to get something a bit more like what I ride and you guys ride.

I've been hucking fat skis for a while so it's like watching a beginner ski - you think @What's stopping them just opening up and fall line@. I don;t want to recommend something I'd be a happy with because to me a 120mm is fine even.

So what bridging ski do you recommend that will take him from carving 12m turns to something that will allow him to ski powder when it comes (European skier), will still hold an edge on the hardpack, and will plow through crud, nothing too tiff, nothing too flexible.

No park skis (though I was considering the Amplid C7 might be a good choice and something for him to work up too).

I was thinking a Legend, but something a bit more unique would be nice.
May 5 2010 10:25AM
0 0
profile picture
IRockLizzys
Posts: 391 - Karma: 11
Line Prophet 100's are a very versatile ski. They have the waist to ski pow and hold an edge very well on hardpack. I wouldn't consider them to be super stiff, but they are certainly not soft.
May 5 2010 10:32AM
0 0
profile picture
Newschool_Pope
Posts: 2473 - Karma: 267
what you described sounds just like what the armada JJ is made for.
check it out.
May 5 2010 11:45AM
0 0
profile picture
Slinger1x1
Posts: 8853 - Karma: 65
volkl bridge, hence the name

but its not really that fat, its like 92 or so under foot?
May 5 2010 12:18PM
0 0
profile picture
Ben.
Posts: 21463 - Karma: 683
god. worst ski ever imo.



throw him on something like 85-90 underfoot. going from carvers that is going to feel plenty fat, and hell definitely notice the float in pow. any more and i worry hell get overwhelmed.
May 5 2010 12:42PM
0 0
profile picture
jason...
Posts: 9006 - Karma: 780
Prophet 90's or 100's.
May 5 2010 2:26PM
0 0
profile picture
leahey
Posts: 2548 - Karma: 32
The new Line EP Pros look pretty good for you
May 5 2010 4:19PM
0 0
profile picture
Ben.
Posts: 21463 - Karma: 683
you clearly did not read the thread AT ALL
May 5 2010 7:53PM
0 0
profile picture
carbon.pulse
Posts: 3348 - Karma: 22
Prophet 100, JJ or Caylor?
May 5 2010 7:55PM
0 0
profile picture
skinnyskisrock
Posts: 40 - Karma: 10
Cheers. Armada and Line are well represented here no.

All good suggestions. 85-90 is plenty fat enough for him :)

Not sure the EP Pro is going to be that fun for him, unless he gets the new Shorty version ;)
May 6 2010 4:38AM
0 0
profile picture
brenker
Posts: 3188 - Karma: 71
definitely. i skied em hard at a demo last year at Stratton, those things rock. Super stable and reallll light n playful.
May 6 2010 9:40AM
0 0
profile picture
I_Am_Mod
Posts: 13214 - Karma: 3,753
if he has a racing background, and isn't all that into freestyle, butters and stuff, i'd recommend him a charging ski...

i myself ride the scottp4; a medium stiff 108mmm waisted ski
has regular camber, early tip rise+taper (no rocker) its very responsive, likes to go fast, goes through anything from deep pow to crud, to ice, basically a great ski if you want to shred the pow like you would shred down an icy groomer, awesome controll and responsiveness...

(however those 12m turns wont work, it has a rather large radius, but as long as you go fast on the groomers you'll be happy with your big radius, seeing how it handles everything great, you litterallly never have to hold back, you can just point those big tips down and enjoy the ride...)
May 6 2010 12:26PM
0 0
profile picture
RudyGarmisch
Posts: 25443 - Karma: 13,844
Funny to think back, Seth Pistols were superfat and way too big for anything but Alaska when they first came out. And they were what, 95 underfoot?

Anything in the 85ish to 100 range would work well, whats going to be weirder for him is the more centered mount. Get him something a little less symmetrical and have him mount back from center, he's not going to be busting cork 5's on this pair, and it'll be a better transition.
May 6 2010 2:20PM
0 0
profile picture
bryant
Posts: 273 - Karma: 31
when i read this title all i could think was...thats what she said
May 6 2010 3:43PM
0 0
profile picture
Newschool_Pope
Posts: 2473 - Karma: 267
haha, i see.
May 6 2010 5:25PM
0 0
profile picture
PaleCelery
Posts: 7228 - Karma: 608
Line Blends? 100 underfoot, next years have some rocker, this years did not, so he could have a choice of whether or not he wants a rockered ski, personally I'd get this years without the rocker and use it as a non pow day ski, but thy still would float great and be able to handle pretty much anything he throws at them.
May 6 2010 7:58PM
0 0
profile picture
mmckechnie
Posts: 1483 - Karma: 29
I'd recommend looking at Line Prophet 100s, Rossignol S5s, and Armada ARVs. All 3 are 95mm to 100mm under foot and have traditional sidecut and camber, something your friend might like after coming of carving skis. The ARVs and S5s are also sidewall skis which gives the skis more energy in and out of turns.
May 6 2010 8:25PM
0 0
profile picture
ohmygod_basedgod
Posts: 534 - Karma: 37
rossi s6
May 6 2010 10:01PM
0 0
profile picture
teleak
Posts: 2251 - Karma: 105
your sarcasm meter could quite possibly be broken, although i may be wrong
May 6 2010 10:09PM
0 0
profile picture
charmander
Posts: 10636 - Karma: 372
92 underfoot.

ik love mine, i come from a race background and really likw mine.
May 6 2010 10:41PM
0 0
profile picture
ike.
Posts: 2292 - Karma: 93
surface watch life
May 7 2010 12:10AM
0 0
profile picture
TheFlyingHonky
Posts: 339 - Karma: 13
Fischer Watea 101 is perfect i think
May 7 2010 12:53AM
0 0
profile picture
family_vacation
Posts: 6200 - Karma: 7,841
Nope, that cosden kid is just a constant retard.
May 7 2010 1:38AM
0 0
profile picture
skinnyskisrock
Posts: 40 - Karma: 10
All good - we have plenty to check out.

A charger is definitely the way - no butters, presses etc or anything of a freestyle nature. He'll want to burn thru the park occasionally but not spend the afternoon there.

Losing 12m turns is not an issue - I love having to really work a fatty to get short turns rather than have the ski do it for me.
May 7 2010 8:09AM
0 0
profile picture
SOLID7
Posts: 239 - Karma: 11
http://www.kingswoodskis.com/home/skis-megafat 151 waist. About right for someone just starting out.
May 7 2010 7:21PM
0 0
profile picture
Ftacnik
Posts: 1997 - Karma: 111
I was thinking next years hellbents....

(Please check sarcasm meeter before replying to this)
May 7 2010 7:43PM
0 0
profile picture
Z_rob
Posts: 3076 - Karma: 152
public enemys
May 8 2010 7:18PM
0 0
profile picture
*TURBONERD*
Posts: 15078 - Karma: 9,136
wow bryant... really?
May 8 2010 8:51PM
0 0
profile picture
skinnyskisrock
Posts: 40 - Karma: 10
Nah not fat enough.

Seriously though, at what point can you not stand up in a normal stance without the fat ski equivalent of thigh chaff and having to stand with legs further apart...?
May 12 2010 8:38AM
0 0
profile picture
fouldsys
Posts: 7404 - Karma: 39
liberty bff. i think they were 200 underfoot.
May 12 2010 12:59PM
0 0
profile picture
skinnyskisrock
Posts: 40 - Karma: 10
Mad

Click for larger image
May 14 2010 6:09AM
0 0
profile picture
CTD
Posts: 6300 - Karma: 348
MSPs? do they even still make um? those things are awesome chargin skis. super light too. see if you can find some older ones. you can definitely lay out some turns on those, and theyre not real symmetrical. Prophet 100s would def. be recommended as well
May 14 2010 12:56PM
0 0
profile picture
.cam.
Posts: 1852 - Karma: 48
im saying prophet flites of the prophet 90's. fischer watea, salomon shogun, last years (08-09) kung fujas
May 14 2010 9:00PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)