thanks a ton homie! that looks like a super baller lens, especially for the price, but im thinking of abandoning my wide angle expenditure, and might just stick with my normal 18-55 f/3.5-5.6 for now, which will suffice as a wide angle for the time being. i know the glass, and ultimately the quality wont be as great, but am i wrong to assume it will work?i think i might purchase a macro, seeing as how one of my favorite types of nature photography, along with landscapes, are plants and i really getting in close to that shot to capture as much detail as possible
i am asking for 2 pieces of advice right now, first- will my 18-55 meet my needs for the time being?
second- i havnt put too much time into researching macro lenses, so what should i look for in them?
thanks for the great response RightCoast!