Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

FX7 vs. FX1 vs. DVX

profile picture
MANDER
Posts: 4017 - Karma: 2,038
So I THINK I've narrowed it down to these cameras. Money is a big issue so the cheaper the better, but if im spending this much money I want it to last for a while before I think I need something better. First off, I heard that FX7 have better quality then DVX but you sacrifice alot of things for that. Also, if someone could help me with the differences between the FX7 and FX1. I know the FX7 is newer but people still like the FX1. Also, if anyone has any other suggestions for cameras I am open to that. Thanks.
Jul 25 2009 1:10PM
0 0
profile picture
ILoveOhio
Posts: 1793 - Karma: 253
FX7 Pros:

-HD....won't get outdated AS fast


DVX Pros:

-More control over image.

-Professional Audio (XLR imputs)

Jul 25 2009 2:11PM
0 0
profile picture
horner
Posts: 2439 - Karma: 1,578
Go with the DVX.  Having owned the Fx1 before, I'd opt for the dvx.
Jul 25 2009 2:32PM
0 0
profile picture
MANDER
Posts: 4017 - Karma: 2,038
is the video quality a big difference?
Jul 25 2009 3:01PM
0 0
profile picture
horner
Posts: 2439 - Karma: 1,578
The fx1 and fx7 are hdv cams and the dvx is standard def.  If you want HD, get the fx1 or 7, if you don't need an hd cam, get the dvx.
Jul 25 2009 3:19PM
0 0
profile picture
CreamSteez.
Posts: 299 - Karma: 81
DVX
Jul 25 2009 7:10PM
0 0
profile picture
MANDER
Posts: 4017 - Karma: 2,038
how do these compare to the dvx. say quality didnt matter between the dvx and fx1, which is better?
Jul 25 2009 8:10PM
0 0
profile picture
Alkyy
Posts: 2839 - Karma: 149
every once in a great while i agree with you
Jul 25 2009 8:20PM
0 0
profile picture
eheath
Posts: 61091 - Karma: 118,105
In youre situation I would get an FX1, cause you're using tapes anyway and you can make fx1 look real good.
Jul 25 2009 9:04PM
0 0
profile picture
[~_~]
Posts: 20239 - Karma: 1,273
DVX kills the FX1. FX7 feels like a cheaper version of the FX1.
Jul 26 2009 4:38PM
0 0
profile picture
eheath
Posts: 61091 - Karma: 118,105
I've seen people make the fx1 look almost as good as an DVX/HVX, its very possible.
Jul 26 2009 6:13PM
0 0
profile picture
[~_~]
Posts: 20239 - Karma: 1,273
"almost" being the key word.
Jul 26 2009 6:30PM
0 0
profile picture
eheath
Posts: 61091 - Karma: 118,105
It all depends on what look you're going for, the 1080i from the fx1 looks pretty damn good and the colors are pretty good too, id probably rather have an fx1 than a dvx, but thats because i like HD. Now you on the other hand don't like super sharp/HD picture so of course you'd want the dvx.
Jul 26 2009 6:51PM
0 0
profile picture
[~_~]
Posts: 20239 - Karma: 1,273
I love sharp a HD picture, I just think that 60i footage should be banished for all of eternity.
Jul 26 2009 10:40PM
0 0
profile picture
eheath
Posts: 61091 - Karma: 118,105
Well thats news to me.
Jul 26 2009 11:13PM
0 0
profile picture
TomasAa
Posts: 585 - Karma: 699
Hey Anderson! What about the xha1? To expensive?
Jul 27 2009 12:58PM
0 0
profile picture
dergblerp
Posts: 1303 - Karma: 77
Really what it boils down to is intended use. An FX1 will be great for skiing, but really isn't a very versatile camera. The DVX, while it's not HD, can be used for just about anything. Variable framerates and XLR's makes it a great camera for narrative films, documentaries, action sports, you name it. This is not to say that you can't use an FX1 to do these things, however the DVX is a superior tool in all respects aside from resolution.
Jul 27 2009 5:11PM
0 0
profile picture
[~_~]
Posts: 20239 - Karma: 1,273
I just don't consider 1080i to really be "high definition," even though that is the terminology. Hell, 1080p seems like it should be considered SD and 4K etc. should be "HD."
Jul 27 2009 5:44PM
0 0
profile picture
horner
Posts: 2439 - Karma: 1,578
HD is a myth
Jul 27 2009 6:04PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)