Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
Ok...... So since meat production is far less efficient than other options it would necessitate agriculture on an even larger scale which would be even more detrimental to the environment.
Also, the displacing huge tracts of wild land for grain production is very very different than slash and burn in the rainforest. While it is unfortunate, it is necessary for our survival, but when managed properly a piece of typical american farmland can be farmed if not infinitely, for many many years, as opposed to burning down new rain forest every couple seasons.
Your point about coffee and banannas is valid, except no where did I say that I think we should replace meat with those or even be consuming them period. For the record, soy and rice are really rough on the environment as well. I strongly believe that Hemp is one of our best hopes for the future as far as an extremely sustainable and low impact food source, but unfortunately current legislation is curtailing any growth in that field.
You are completely right about water useage being a huge issue. Our aquifers are not infinite and the river systems are already completely overtaxed. Again, less meat production would help to moderate this. Feed grain for livestock requires as much water as grain for humans. Also, free range cattle are the major cause of soil/bank erosion in many areas which causes shallower, more clogged rivers, hence even more irrigation/water rights issues.
I think your attitude on this issue is pretty shortsighted and reeks of self-denial. Be man enough to admit the negative aspects of your life, regardless of whether you feel that you should or shouldn't change them.
As I've said before, I am in no way perfect, and am more than willing to admit to the error of my ways. All I'm asking for is the same honesty in others.