Well i was wondering about the actuall size of the ski and i want to see the ski next to someone to see it and just not think about what the 180 looks like so if anyone could post a pic of the msp model (ski) with them just standing next to it that would be tight
fuck u its not a dumb thread at all because first of all i want them for the park aspect of being a fat ski and i just wanted to make sure they werent to fat. Yea yea i know i ve seen the pic on freeskier with spence and at the site but i just wanted like a pic taken like straight on so i could visualize it (haha that sounded funny) because i didnt just want to buy a ski without haviung any sense of how it rides im not tryin to buy a name im trying to get a good ski so go fuck ur self
how the fuck is seeing a picture of a ski going to help determine how it rides? and how the fuck is a picture of the ski next to someone going to do the same? the site gives you the fucking dimensions...get your ruler out at look at the fucking thing...you have no right to talk shit...yuse your fucking head.
most skis are the same size unless the company measures them by contact points (k2) so as long as they measure em normally there's no diff then any 180, not that a 2-4 cm difference is a big deal anyways
Representin the CMP
first off you dont need that fat of a ski for wisconsin. i ride in wisconsin and there is no need for that fat of a ski. it will only hurt you because our parks are so much smaller and flatter that a fat ski will do you no good