Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Head MoJo geometry is here!!!

profile picture
duboix
Posts: 52 - Karma: 10
Geometry: 125/90/118
Lengths: 166, 176, 186cm
Sidecut radius: 22.4m(186cm)

And they are fukken solid, just as stable as fuk. Almost like new Head Monster iM 85. I wanted to buy monsters, but they are so ugly, and MoJo are twin-tipped, wider under foot and more center-mounting adapted, so these are my stix!!!

And it's picture again:



And these are the Monsters iM 85, pretty ugly, huh?


------------------------------------------
Okay, okay! I take it back. Unfuck you!!!
Aug 20 2003 8:49AM
0 0
profile picture
EatASaurusRex
Posts: 18 - Karma: 10
i will eat you. get bigger sticks, 90mm is pussy
Aug 20 2003 9:00AM
0 0
profile picture
dirty_dreb
Posts: 2659 - Karma: 19
thats SWEET! i would get them, but i just bought tms. I heard they are bomb-proof but extremely heavy
____________________
mark d
Aug 20 2003 9:48AM
0 0
profile picture
CollinWright
Posts: 1919 - Karma: 82
THOSE SKIS ARE GAY
,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Sep 15 2003 3:29AM
0 0
profile picture
west
Posts: 5229 - Karma: 36
yah they seem pretty nice, i'd wanna demo them for sure





don't throw stones if you live in a glass house;
and if you got a glass jaw you better watch your mouth
Sep 15 2003 3:30AM
0 0
profile picture
Papa
Posts: 4718 - Karma: 11
i think those monsters look pretty sexy, i don't like white on my material goods, so the madtrix have never appealed to me, and yes i did own them and i didn't like how they skied either, but cool anyway




Seize the carp
Sep 15 2003 3:48AM
0 0
profile picture
CTripper
Posts: 6520 - Karma: 20
yes ugly. that's the main factor in deciding what ski to get right? i mean, length, width, stiffness, who needs that bullshit when you got STYYYYLE
-chris
Sep 15 2003 4:18AM
0 0
profile picture
duboix
Posts: 52 - Karma: 10
That was a kind of joke, I mean, the fact that Monsters are ugly. MoJos are pretty ugly too, but they are so sick on the run, that i can handle their kinda gay appearance.

My main concern about Monsters was that they got really short and stiff tail, so landings will not be so comfortable. Also i wonder if they'll be okay in trees or steep'n'tight places.

MoJos, on the other hand, ski shorter than they are because of twintip and more center-mounting. And they are still stable, powerfull, and very fast, just like Monsters and surprisingly nimble at the same time.
------------------------------------------
Okay, okay! I take it back. Unfuck you!!!
Sep 16 2003 2:31PM
0 0
profile picture
phUnk
Posts: 647 - Karma: 35
Monsters are still and kind of spank you if you are in the backseat, etc. They have a good amount of sidecut, but you really can't be lazy skiing them.
Sep 17 2003 7:14PM
0 0
profile picture
phUnk
Posts: 647 - Karma: 35
Monsters are stiFF, is what I meant to type. Probably stiffer than the MoJo's, but that is just a guess.
Sep 17 2003 7:15PM
0 0
profile picture
Papa
Posts: 4718 - Karma: 11
nothing changed on the monsters except for the graphics, but they are also almost 500 more than last year




Seize the carp
Sep 17 2003 7:24PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)