Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
Oakley Evo Jkt + Pieced Togheter Pant
Posts: 147
-
Karma: 15
I think I am going for the Evo Jkt(ozone) and the Pieced Together Pant (ozone) but i dunno which size ... I am 6'0", would xxl be too baggy....how long will fit the JKT then and what other oakley pants are there in the same colour????
Posts: 160
-
Karma: 11
XL or XXL would be fine depending on how baggy you want it to be.
There's already a thread on all the jackets and pants that come in ozone.
Posts: 147
-
Karma: 15
thx for answers yeah i found the thread but one question... how long will the evo lite jacket fit in xxl???...to the knees???
Posts: 4221
-
Karma: 13
i doubt it will go to your knees if your 6' tall it will be a little past your waist
Posts: 4462
-
Karma: 298
the jacket will pretty much hang to your ballsack.
Posts: 160
-
Karma: 11
I'm about 6' too and I wear an XL jacket but XXL wouldn't be huge if you like it big!
Posts: 147
-
Karma: 15
not huge but baggy enough???
Posts: 4462
-
Karma: 298
ohh no, its fuckin huge. It will make you look like a child. Don't get me wrong. Like the sleeves hang over my hands. I would say get the XL. It will be big, but not to the point where you drown in your jacket.
Posts: 1156
-
Karma: 28
I might even reccommend L if you want it more 'fitted' than baggy.
You reckon?
Posts: 4462
-
Karma: 298
i agree with that statement.
Posts: 147
-
Karma: 15
but when i want it really baggy, and i want it really baggy =) then should i take xxl?
Posts: 2095
-
Karma: 14
Posts: 1322
-
Karma: 33
get xxl it isn't really as big as everyone is making it sound.
Posts: 147
-
Karma: 15
okey i think i go for the pants 100% in xxl and order a oakley jacket in xl and decide then if i want it bigger or not...the problem is when i want the pant and jacket in xxl the shop has to make a special order for me and i have to take the stuff because they normaly has sizes not bigger than xl...and does anyone know what the difference between the evo and the evo lite is???? thx
Posts: 6382
-
Karma: 946
don't get XXL bro... and the difference is that the Evo Lite is not insulated
Posts: 3994
-
Karma: 285
Get the pants in 2XL and the jacket in xl. Oakley's 2XL pants are rediculously small compared to other brands' 2XL.
Posts: 4462
-
Karma: 298
wrong......i just have an xl in Baggy, im 6'1....the the crotch is to my KNEES. I have a xxl in loose fit, and that is to my knees too. It depends on what fit you get. Oakley is massive stuff, like MASSIVE.
Posts: 7485
-
Karma: 396
some of this info is so false. from my experience (i'm 6'1) L always ends up being way too short, xl can do the trick, and xxl is really the only way to go. if there was a xxxl I'd buy it. Honestly, xxl for pants, xl or xxl for jacket depending on if you want baggy or kinda baggy, I just got a xxl oakley mast suit in the mail today and it isn't even THAT big. I mean it's ballin, but i'm not swimming in it.
Posts: 147
-
Karma: 15
...then does anyone know what fit the "pieced together pant" and the "evo" have, because i can't find any info on oakley.com...???
Posts: 147
-
Karma: 15
Posts: 147
-
Karma: 15
Posts: 1156
-
Karma: 28
I will find out if it's neccessary, but can you not get the flow of this thread?
It's saying get XL, if you get 2XL you'll look like a bit of a dick
Posts: 147
-
Karma: 15
I can follow the thread, but everyone is saying other shit =)... it would be cool when you can find it out, thx...
Posts: 6382
-
Karma: 946
All the information will be on Backcountry.com soon. And please get the XL
Posts: 2785
-
Karma: 474
dude you are soo wrong. honestly dont act like people are stupid just because you have some weird porportioned body with short legs. Oakley pants are TINY. you are wrong, their pants are TINY. Im an average sized 6'2, and I had a pair of XL oakleys. they were the smallest pants ive owned in 2 years, and the first XL i had ever bought. I ended up selling them because unless I sagged to my lower thighs they were redicolously short.
To the creator, you should definitely go with XXL pants. An XL jacket would be fine, as would a XXL. But the jackets actually run decently large, so an XL would give you a nice baggy fit.
Posts: 3994
-
Karma: 285
Thanks for the back up, I had a 2 pairs of Oakley pants last year that were both XXL and both were smaller in length and waist than my 686 gear in size Large.
All times are Eastern (-4)
