Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Would you buy this ski

profile picture
sander_h
Posts: 1697 - Karma: 5,737
would you buy a ski that is 125/93/118 in a 179 or bigger with a medium stiffness? What do u think about dimensions?
Aug 6 2007 4:44AM
0 0
profile picture
KravtZ
Posts: 6637 - Karma: 2,629
ehh idk might be ok for like a pow day but dont think the dimensions would work out that well but i really dont no

r u makin a ski with those dimensions?
Aug 6 2007 7:57AM
0 0
profile picture
steezyjibber
Posts: 15967 - Karma: 11,016
this is for surface isn't it.
Aug 6 2007 8:20AM
0 0
profile picture
jp_draves
Posts: 1866 - Karma: 37
is surface planning on making a new ski?
Aug 6 2007 8:51AM
0 0
profile picture
Bo_bot9
Posts: 1437 - Karma: 275
120/91/115 would be sick in like a 184
Aug 6 2007 9:13AM
0 0
profile picture
fillup
Posts: 4904 - Karma: 568
i wouldnt
Aug 6 2007 10:07AM
0 0
profile picture
sander_h
Posts: 1697 - Karma: 5,737
no not surface
Aug 6 2007 1:31PM
0 0
profile picture
albion
Posts: 148 - Karma: 10
I'm not that fond of a 92 in waist. It's a little to wide for park and way to thin for pow.
Aug 6 2007 2:54PM
0 0
profile picture
Triple_Strum
Posts: 6382 - Karma: 946
it would be okay, VERY similar to the first model of the ARV in both 03/04 and 04/05. They were 125/92/115 in a 185 and had medium to stiff flex. A good all around ski, but a little slow
Aug 6 2007 2:57PM
0 0
profile picture
steezyjibber
Posts: 15967 - Karma: 11,016
on3p right
Aug 6 2007 3:29PM
0 0
profile picture
Commonwealth
Posts: 3729 - Karma: 11
exactly what i was going to say...if i was going to buy them i would use them as a all-mountain/sometimes park ski
Aug 6 2007 3:34PM
0 0
profile picture
freeski1620
Posts: 5670 - Karma: 1,718
that sounds like a dope ski, if you made it in like a 193 that would be prime. maybe a little more than medium stifness though. i like the semi smaller waist though, that will be better on hard pack. i would get a ski like that for sure.
Aug 6 2007 3:48PM
0 0
profile picture
artfullydodged
Posts: 8358 - Karma: 1,674
no.
Aug 6 2007 5:16PM
0 0
profile picture
lt.milo
Posts: 1582 - Karma: 138
sounds good, i would make the flex a bit softer though
Aug 6 2007 6:15PM
0 0
profile picture
13stripes
Posts: 3795 - Karma: 273
kinda weird dementions seems like they should be a touch wider underfoot
Aug 6 2007 6:20PM
0 0
profile picture
hollygrove
Posts: 7845 - Karma: 93
187
133-100-133
(symetrical)
with medium flex

there's a ski i need.

I do not know why it just went into italics
Aug 6 2007 6:56PM
0 0
profile picture
chickenwang
Posts: 5639 - Karma: 40
judging by how his sig changed to on3p skis from w/e it was id have to agree
Aug 6 2007 7:08PM
0 0
profile picture
sander_h
Posts: 1697 - Karma: 5,737
bump
Aug 7 2007 1:05PM
0 0
profile picture
lt.milo
Posts: 1582 - Karma: 138
nah i doubt these are for on3p.  to skinny
Aug 8 2007 2:20PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)