Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

SAT

profile picture
golf
Posts: 1418 - Karma: 14
So I did pretty bad on my SAT and I don't want to take it again because it is hell and I thought of an idea. What if every person in the country starting now never took the SAT. colleges couldn't use it to judge people and it would become useless to them which would then make the company who makes the SAT loose money and quit. I know this is impossible because of over achievers but I think it would work if everyone did it. This also apllies to the ACT too.
Jun 12 2007 5:36PM
0 0
profile picture
Tasche
Posts: 5422 - Karma: 99
Im sorry you suck. Take the ACT
Jun 12 2007 5:43PM
0 0
profile picture
ECGove
Posts: 1947 - Karma: 75
take ACTs, i thought it was an easier test, plus theres only 4 sections
Jun 12 2007 5:44PM
0 0
profile picture
RudyGarmisch
Posts: 25443 - Karma: 13,844
SAT's are pretty much worthless, especially if you only are applying to small colleges. If youre in the Midwest, the ACT is mandatory, and Harvey Mudd is the only school that actually requires that you take the SAT. So.... take the ACT, or just get beefy letters of rec and grades and apply to smaller schools.
Jun 12 2007 6:04PM
0 0
profile picture
gnustreetfool
Posts: 2595 - Karma: 51
i took the act plus writing over the weekend. english part was mad easy but i am really bad at math and the since part i didnt know much either but over all easier than the psat
Jun 12 2007 7:03PM
0 0
profile picture
DYFI
Posts: 3836 - Karma: 30
I've come to the conclusion that the second time you do much better.  If not, fuck it and take the ACTs they are easier anyways.
Jun 12 2007 7:07PM
0 0
profile picture
N-John360
Posts: 835 - Karma: 8
So what scores did ya all get...1720 for me.
Jun 12 2007 7:51PM
0 0
profile picture
Alkyy
Posts: 2839 - Karma: 149

take the act, unless you wanna go to harvard or somehting you can get in most places with a 1600(on the new scale)

Jun 12 2007 8:00PM
0 0
profile picture
mistaskia
Posts: 1252 - Karma: 32
hahah 1670 for me... pritty bad.
Jun 12 2007 8:06PM
0 0
profile picture
Schoening
Posts: 14332 - Karma: 1,266
thank god for sports.....
Jun 12 2007 9:56PM
0 0
profile picture
lushlaxstr
Posts: 3063 - Karma: 41
what did you get?
              
Jun 12 2007 10:20PM
0 0
profile picture
bangarangmules
Posts: 5065 - Karma: 84
word
Jun 12 2007 10:41PM
0 0
profile picture
mothaeast
Posts: 2923 - Karma: 13
ACT's are easy, but take writing too, most colleges require it.
Jun 12 2007 10:42PM
0 0
profile picture
ArmadaFreerider8
Posts: 4565 - Karma: 10
did you get a scholarship for a sport? Which one?
Jun 13 2007 12:12AM
0 0
profile picture
jimmychung
Posts: 6857 - Karma: 25
i did so much better on the ACTs than the SATs. i think it's much better at measuring someone's true intelligence and college potential. it takes a certain kind of mind to do well on the SATs, i know very smart people who have done poorly on it. ACTs rule, boycott the SAT!
Jun 13 2007 12:14AM
0 0
profile picture
SirFryanator
Posts: 11149 - Karma: 1,415
even though it's not required colleges still love to see a very high SAT score.
For example, of of my very close friends got a 2310 on their SAT. He has a 3.75 (honors/AP at our school do not count as a 5.0 GPA he would have well above a 4.0) but he's applying to princeton and some other very good schools and he has a good chance of getting in because of sports. Then again he also aced the ACT...but the more good test grades you get into them the higher chance of them accepting you.
Jun 13 2007 12:16AM
0 0
profile picture
RudyGarmisch
Posts: 25443 - Karma: 13,844
He's right, please agree with him.
Jun 13 2007 12:16AM
0 0
profile picture
stempy
Posts: 468 - Karma: 10
ACT > SAT
Jun 13 2007 1:49AM
0 0
profile picture
cobra_commander
Posts: 16909 - Karma: 4,682
18fucking30. I fucking hate it. but it is dyeing, bulder might not even look at it in a few years and A bunchof other schools don't give a crap about it, the esay is fucking pointless, you cant be judged by a supposable well thoughtout and written paper that you did it 25 fucking minutes. The math is fucking pointless too so is the reading, and basedout of the people I have talked to there is an inverse relation to how smart you are and your score, my friends a geniuss and he got 1750 and another kid who is not so smart got 800 on the math, so kohl don't feel bad, your probly really smart. and fuck you with your soccer your application will be like 1/4 the length of any I fill out.
Jun 13 2007 1:56AM
0 0
profile picture
Schoening
Posts: 14332 - Karma: 1,266
no im a juinor...but soccer is what is going to help me get into a school i couldn't academically
Jun 13 2007 1:58AM
0 0
profile picture
cobra_commander
Posts: 16909 - Karma: 4,682
how do you know you cant academically? other then the fact that you cant spell junior right.
Jun 13 2007 2:01AM
0 0
profile picture
mmmmm...Pie
Posts: 673 - Karma: 15
Considering a lot of colleges turn away kids by the thousands, boycotting the SAT/ACT wouldn't do squat. They'd just accept took it and throw out the boycotters. ACT is the only one you really need anyway. It's a much better test too.
Jun 13 2007 2:05AM
0 0
profile picture
BFFset.
Posts: 2210 - Karma: 12
but if they didn't have the SAT, then they'd go by grades. so it can be an easy way out for some
Jun 13 2007 2:58AM
0 0
profile picture
Ryanvdonk
Posts: 12808 - Karma: 1,945
1410 on the old (out of 1600), 33 on the ACT.
Jun 13 2007 3:40AM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)