I know there are a million chronic posts out there but i'm having a hard time deciding if i want the chronics or the trouble makers or mabe something totally different. I ski about 30% park - not many rails but boxes yes. most of my skiing is groomers and mougles. I want something that'll carve good on the hard packed snow of New York. help me.
Can't go wrong with either one. Get the cheaper one.
-------------------------------------- 'Duran Duran bought Armada, Armada bought Microsoft, Microsoft bought MSP and AOL, AOL owns Time4 which owns the MountainSportsMedia which owns SKi, Skiing and RIP Freeze... so Armada now owns McDonalds and Coke.
pretty opposite skis really. i own the chronics and they are stiff, great everywhere, and bombproof. a friend owns the tms, and according to him they are flexy, fun, but get destructed fairly quickly.
we have the power to change the evil in the world. stand up and fight the obstacles between reality and your dreams. we can make a difference. all we need to do is stand together, and like a tidal wave splinters a dike, we will destroy what stands in our way
my tms busted through crud fine for me and im pretty aggressive. they're both going to be good skis no matter which you decide. obviously im going to like the tm's cause i own a pair, and 1080PLP is going to like the chrons because thats what he owns.
I don't even ride them for all mt tho thats why i have my moships. i think that they suck outside of the park just like the TM but hey i love huge sweaping GS turns and i need a longer stiffer ski for that anyways.