what video camera

be careful with the JVC's. the quality isn't up to par with canon and sony and the firewire port may not be compatible with the latest standards. i had a JVC mini DV before owning a gl1 and now an optura 100MC and the firewire port never would work making it pretty freegin useless. i'd verify the firewire compatibility before i laid down any cash!
___________________
bob
jibij.com

id say save up and get a sony over a canon



I love cheetos!!

i have the panasonic pv dv201, with a fisheye lense, it's the shit! not that expensive either, pretty good quality for a single chip camera.
'what the fuck are fries and gravy?'

hellocamera.com has the canon zr40 for $480 USD.
'if you look at a chick and the first thing that comes to mind is an animal, that is not good.' -etom

My friend has that JVC cam yuor talking about it seems to be ok it works with Final Cut Pro 3. doesnt have an accessarie(sp) shoe thought. I am going to get the Sony trv50 pretty expensive but nice.




When a door says private dont you just wanna walk in anyways

uh, jvc..
____________________
when life give you lemons, squeeze them in someones eyes

JVC quality doesnt come up to par with Sony or Canon. I would say Canon's are the best. They have the best quality and they have an analog input.
_____________________
Teddy Knape
Skier10322@aol.com

I have a cannon pv-910 pro, it has a few year on it, but it has taken a licking, is still ticking, i am looking to get an older film camera to add more of a artistic look on my stuff, and get some real movie making skills, all my dv films are so clear it looks like a porno or soap opera. Premiere does have an after affects program that can mask your dv, and i like it, but i still want to shoot on the real stuff. but as far as dv goes, i say you can't go wrong with the cannon gl1, there is a new camera that you can shoot at differn't framrates just like film, that is going to be tight.